Suppr超能文献

识别有效药物依从性干预措施中行为改变技术的配置:一项定性比较分析。

Identifying configurations of behavior change techniques in effective medication adherence interventions: a qualitative comparative analysis.

作者信息

Kahwati Leila, Viswanathan Meera, Golin Carol E, Kane Heather, Lewis Megan, Jacobs Sara

机构信息

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Departments of Medicine and Health Behavior, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2016 May 4;5:83. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0255-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interventions to improve medication adherence are diverse and complex. Consequently, synthesizing this evidence is challenging. We aimed to extend the results from an existing systematic review of interventions to improve medication adherence by using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to identify necessary or sufficient configurations of behavior change techniques among effective interventions.

METHODS

We used data from 60 studies in a completed systematic review to examine the combinations of nine behavior change techniques (increasing knowledge, increasing awareness, changing attitude, increasing self-efficacy, increasing intention formation, increasing action control, facilitation, increasing maintenance support, and motivational interviewing) among studies demonstrating improvements in adherence.

RESULTS

Among the 60 studies, 34 demonstrated improved medication adherence. Among effective studies, increasing patient knowledge was a necessary but not sufficient technique. We identified seven configurations of behavior change techniques sufficient for improving adherence, which together accounted for 26 (76 %) of the effective studies. The intervention configuration that included increasing knowledge and self-efficacy was the most empirically relevant, accounting for 17 studies (50 %) and uniquely accounting for 15 (44 %).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis extends the completed review findings by identifying multiple combinations of behavior change techniques that improve adherence. Our findings offer direction for policy makers, practitioners, and future comparative effectiveness research on improving adherence.

摘要

背景

改善药物治疗依从性的干预措施多样且复杂。因此,综合这些证据具有挑战性。我们旨在通过运用定性比较分析(QCA)来确定有效干预措施中行为改变技术的必要或充分组合,从而扩展现有关于改善药物治疗依从性干预措施的系统评价结果。

方法

我们使用了一项已完成的系统评价中60项研究的数据,来检验9种行为改变技术(增加知识、提高意识、改变态度、增强自我效能感、增加意图形成、增强行动控制、促进、增加维持支持和动机性访谈)在显示依从性改善的研究中的组合情况。

结果

在这60项研究中,34项显示药物治疗依从性得到改善。在有效研究中,增加患者知识是一项必要但不充分的技术。我们确定了7种足以改善依从性的行为改变技术组合,这些组合共同涵盖了26项(76%)有效研究。包含增加知识和自我效能感的干预组合在实证方面最为相关,占17项研究(50%),且单独占15项(44%)。

结论

该分析通过确定多种改善依从性的行为改变技术组合,扩展了已完成的综述结果。我们的研究结果为政策制定者、从业者以及未来关于改善依从性的比较效果研究提供了方向。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验