Picard F, Tadros V X, Pighi M, Spagnoli V, De Hemptinne Q, Ly H Q
Interventional Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Interventional Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2017 Feb;66(1):32-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 May 19.
In recent years, a large body of evidence has revealed the limitations of angiographic evaluation in determining the physiological significance of coronary stenosis, particularly when these are intermediate lesions. Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) guided by physiological assessment using fractional flow reserve (FFR) have been shown to reduce cardiovascular events when compared to angiography alone. Recently, another coronary physiologic parameter has been introduced: the "instantaneous wave-free ratio" (iFR). In this review, we will discuss the FFR, the iFR, and their use in the functional assessment of coronary stenosis in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. This review will cover theoretical aspects for non-interventional cardiologists, as well as practice points and common pitfalls related to coronary physiological assessment for interventional cardiologists.
近年来,大量证据揭示了血管造影评估在确定冠状动脉狭窄生理意义方面的局限性,尤其是当这些病变为中度病变时。与单纯血管造影相比,使用血流储备分数(FFR)进行生理评估指导下的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)已被证明可减少心血管事件。最近,另一种冠状动脉生理参数被引入:“瞬时无波比值”(iFR)。在本综述中,我们将讨论FFR、iFR及其在心脏导管实验室冠状动脉狭窄功能评估中的应用。本综述将涵盖非介入心脏病学家的理论方面,以及介入心脏病学家在冠状动脉生理评估方面的实践要点和常见陷阱。