Suppr超能文献

血流储备分数(FFR)和瞬时无波形比值(iFR)指导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗

FFR and iFR guided percutaneous coronary intervention.

作者信息

Matsuo Hitoshi, Kawase Yoshiaki

机构信息

The Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu Heart Center, 4-14-4, Yabutaminami, Gifu, Gifu, 500-8384, Japan.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2016 Jul;31(3):183-95. doi: 10.1007/s12928-016-0404-2. Epub 2016 May 24.

Abstract

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an invasive physiologic index measured in the cardiac catheterization laboratory to assess the functional significance of a coronary stenosis. It is now accepted as the reference standard to indicate whether a stenosis is likely to be responsible for ischemia. It is generally accepted that a stenosis with an ischemic value of FFR is responsible for symptom and a worse outcome and should be revascularized, whereas lesions with a non-ischemic FFR have a more favorable prognosis and can be treated medically. Furthermore, FFR-guided revascularization strategy has been definitely proven to be better than angiography-guided strategy in pivotal landmark studies such as DEFER, FAME, and FAME2. Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is another physiological index which can be obtained at rest without hyperemic stimulation. iFR is conceptually different from FFR, leading to lively scientific debate about this index. In this review article, the concept, clinical value of FFR and iFR for clinical practice are reviewed.

摘要

血流储备分数(FFR)是在心脏导管实验室测量的一种有创生理指标,用于评估冠状动脉狭窄的功能意义。目前,它被公认为指示狭窄是否可能导致缺血的参考标准。一般认为,FFR具有缺血值的狭窄会导致症状和更差的预后,应进行血运重建,而FFR无缺血的病变预后更有利,可进行药物治疗。此外,在DEFER、FAME和FAME2等关键标志性研究中,FFR指导的血运重建策略已被明确证明优于血管造影指导的策略。瞬时无波比值(iFR)是另一种生理指标,可在静息状态下无需充血刺激即可获得。iFR在概念上与FFR不同,引发了关于该指标的激烈科学争论。在这篇综述文章中,将对FFR和iFR在临床实践中的概念、临床价值进行综述。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验