Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Gastroenterology Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Gastroenterology. 2016 Aug;151(2):288-297.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.04.048. Epub 2016 May 20.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Rectal indomethacin reduces the risk of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Most studies of its efficacy included high-risk cohorts and excluded low-risk patients, including those with malignant biliary obstruction. We investigated the potential of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in a variety of patients.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of 4017 patients who underwent ERCP at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, from 2009 and 2015, including 823 patients with malignant biliary obstruction. After June 2012, with a few exceptions, patients received indomethacin after their procedure. We collected data from patients' records on demographic and clinical features, procedures, and development of PEP. PEP was defined by consensus criteria. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for the association between indomethacin and PEP.
Rectal indomethacin reduced the odds of PEP by 65% (OR, 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.51; P < .001) and moderate-to-severe PEP by 83% (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.09-0.32; P < .001). In patients with malignant obstruction, rectal indomethacin reduced the risk of PEP by 64% (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17-0.75; P < .001) and moderate-to-severe PEP by 80% (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.07-0.63; P < .001). Among patients with malignant obstruction, rectal indomethacin provided the greatest benefit to patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: 2.31% of these patients who received rectal indomethacin developed PEP vs 7.53% who did not receive rectal indomethacin (P < .001) and 0.59% of these patients who received rectal indomethacin developed moderate-to-severe PEP vs 4.32% who did not receive rectal indomethacin (P = .001).
In a large retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing ERCP that included low-risk patients and patients with malignant biliary obstruction, rectal indomethacin was associated with a significant decrease in the absolute rate and severity of pancreatitis.
直肠用吲哚美辛可降低内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)后胰腺炎的风险。大多数关于其疗效的研究都纳入了高危队列,排除了低危患者,包括恶性胆道梗阻患者。我们调查了直肠用吲哚美辛在各种患者中预防 ERCP 后胰腺炎(PEP)的潜力。
我们对 2009 年至 2015 年在宾夕法尼亚大学医院接受 ERCP 的 4017 例患者进行了回顾性队列研究,其中 823 例患者有恶性胆道梗阻。2012 年 6 月后,除了少数例外,患者在手术后接受吲哚美辛。我们从患者记录中收集了人口统计学和临床特征、手术以及 PEP 发展的数据。PEP 通过共识标准定义。多变量逻辑回归用于确定吲哚美辛与 PEP 之间关联的调整比值比(OR)。
直肠用吲哚美辛使 PEP 的几率降低了 65%(OR,0.35;95%置信区间[CI],0.24-0.51;P <.001),中度至重度 PEP 的几率降低了 83%(OR,0.17;95%CI,0.09-0.32;P <.001)。在恶性梗阻患者中,直肠用吲哚美辛使 PEP 的风险降低了 64%(OR,0.36;95%CI,0.17-0.75;P <.001),中度至重度 PEP 的风险降低了 80%(OR,0.20;95%CI,0.07-0.63;P <.001)。在恶性梗阻患者中,直肠用吲哚美辛使胰腺腺癌患者获益最大:接受直肠用吲哚美辛的这些患者中,有 2.31%发生 PEP,而未接受直肠用吲哚美辛的患者中,有 7.53%发生 PEP(P <.001);接受直肠用吲哚美辛的这些患者中,有 0.59%发生中度至重度 PEP,而未接受直肠用吲哚美辛的患者中,有 4.32%发生中度至重度 PEP(P =.001)。
在一项纳入低危患者和恶性胆道梗阻患者的接受 ERCP 的大型回顾性队列研究中,直肠用吲哚美辛与胰腺炎的绝对发生率和严重程度显著降低相关。