Bai Anthony D, Showler Adrienne, Burry Lisa, Steinberg Marilyn, Ricciuto Daniel R, Fernandes Tania, Chiu Anna, Raybardhan Sumit, Science Michelle, Fernando Eshan, Tomlinson George, Bell Chaim M, Morris Andrew M
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 May;70(5):1539-46. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku560. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
We compared the effectiveness of cefazolin versus cloxacillin in the treatment of MSSA bacteraemia in terms of mortality and relapse.
A retrospective cohort study examined consecutive patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia from six academic and community hospitals between 2007 and 2010. Patients with MSSA bacteraemia who received cefazolin or cloxacillin as the predominant definitive antibiotic therapy were included in the study. Ninety-day mortality was compared between the two groups matched by propensity scores.
Of 354 patients included in the study, 105 (30%) received cefazolin and 249 (70%) received cloxacillin as the definitive antibiotic therapy. In 90 days, 96 (27%) patients died: 21/105 (20%) in the cefazolin group and 75/249 (30%) in the cloxacillin group. Within 90 days, 10 patients (3%) had a relapse of S. aureus infection: 6/105 (6%) in the cefazolin group and 4/249 (2%) in the cloxacillin group. All relapses in the cefazolin group were related to a deep-seated infection. Based on the estimated propensity score, 90 patients in the cefazolin group were matched with 90 patients in the cloxacillin group. In the propensity score-matched groups, cefazolin had an HR of 0.58 (95% CI 0.31-1.08, P = 0.0846) for 90 day mortality.
There was no significant clinical difference between cefazolin and cloxacillin in the treatment of MSSA bacteraemia with respect to mortality. Cefazolin was associated with non-significantly more relapses compared with cloxacillin, especially in deep-seated S. aureus infections.
我们比较了头孢唑林与氯唑西林在治疗甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)菌血症方面的死亡率和复发率疗效。
一项回顾性队列研究对2007年至2010年间来自六家学术和社区医院的连续金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者进行了检查。接受头孢唑林或氯唑西林作为主要确定性抗生素治疗的MSSA菌血症患者被纳入研究。通过倾向评分匹配两组患者,比较90天死亡率。
在纳入研究的354例患者中,105例(30%)接受头孢唑林作为确定性抗生素治疗,249例(70%)接受氯唑西林作为确定性抗生素治疗。90天内,96例(27%)患者死亡:头孢唑林组21/105例(20%),氯唑西林组75/249例(30%)。90天内,10例(3%)患者出现金黄色葡萄球菌感染复发:头孢唑林组6/105例(6%),氯唑西林组4/249例(2%)。头孢唑林组的所有复发均与深部感染有关。根据估计的倾向评分,头孢唑林组90例患者与氯唑西林组90例患者进行匹配。在倾向评分匹配组中,头孢唑林治疗90天死亡率的风险比(HR)为0.58(95%可信区间0.31 - 1.08,P = 0.0846)。
在治疗MSSA菌血症方面,头孢唑林和氯唑西林在死亡率上无显著临床差异。与氯唑西林相比,头孢唑林的复发率略高但无统计学意义,尤其是在深部金黄色葡萄球菌感染中。