• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2型糖尿病高血压患者的抗高血压药物类别与死亡率——随机试验的网状荟萃分析

Classes of antihypertensive agents and mortality in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes-Network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

作者信息

Remonti Luciana R, Dias Sofia, Leitão Cristiane B, Kramer Caroline K, Klassman Lucas P, Welton Nicky J, Ades A E, Gross Jorge L

机构信息

Diabetes and Endocrinology Meta-Analysis (DEMA) group, Endocrinology Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

J Diabetes Complications. 2016 Aug;30(6):1192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.04.020. Epub 2016 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.04.020
PMID:27217022
Abstract

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of antihypertensive drug classes in mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Clinical Trials and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized trials comparing thiazides, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCBs), angiotensin-converting inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs), alone or in combination for hypertension treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes. Outcomes were overall and cardiovascular mortality. Network meta-analysis was used to obtain pooled effect estimate.

RESULTS

A total of 27 studies, comprising 49,418 participants, 5647 total and 1306 cardiovascular deaths were included. No differences in total or cardiovascular mortality were observed with isolated antihypertensive drug classes compared to each other or placebo. The ACEi and CCB combination showed evidence of reduction in cardiovascular mortality comparing to placebo [median HR, 95% credibility intervals: 0.16, 0.01-0.82], betablockers (0.20, 0.02-0.98), CCBs (0.21, 0.02-0.97) and ARBs (0.18, 0.02-0.91). In included trials, this combination was the treatment that most consistently achieved both lower systolic and diastolic end of study blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no benefit of a single antihypertensive class in reduction of mortality in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. Reduction of cardiovascular mortality observed in patients treated with ACEi and CCB combination may be related to lower blood pressure levels.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估抗高血压药物类别对2型糖尿病患者死亡率的影响。

方法

检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、临床试验和Cochrane图书馆,以查找比较噻嗪类、β受体阻滞剂、钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)单独或联合用于2型糖尿病患者高血压治疗的随机试验。结局指标为全因死亡率和心血管死亡率。采用网状荟萃分析获得合并效应估计值。

结果

共纳入27项研究,包括49418名参与者,全因死亡5647例,心血管死亡1306例。与其他单一抗高血压药物类别或安慰剂相比,未观察到全因死亡率或心血管死亡率存在差异。与安慰剂[中位数风险比(HR),95%可信区间:0.16,0.01 - 0.82]、β受体阻滞剂(0.20,0.02 - 0.98)、CCB(0.21,0.02 - 0.97)和ARB(0.18,0.02 - 0.91)相比,ACEi与CCB联合使用显示出降低心血管死亡率的证据。在纳入的试验中,这种联合治疗是最能持续实现较低收缩压和舒张压的治疗方法。

结论

单一抗高血压药物类别对降低2型糖尿病高血压患者的死亡率无益处。ACEi与CCB联合治疗的患者中观察到的心血管死亡率降低可能与较低的血压水平有关。

相似文献

1
Classes of antihypertensive agents and mortality in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes-Network meta-analysis of randomized trials.2型糖尿病高血压患者的抗高血压药物类别与死亡率——随机试验的网状荟萃分析
J Diabetes Complications. 2016 Aug;30(6):1192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.04.020. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
2
First-line drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin system versus other first-line antihypertensive drug classes for hypertension.用于治疗高血压的一线肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂与其他一线抗高血压药物类别对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 14;11(11):CD008170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008170.pub3.
3
First-line drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin system versus other first-line antihypertensive drug classes for hypertension.用于治疗高血压的一线肾素血管紧张素系统抑制剂与其他一线抗高血压药物类别对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 11;1:CD008170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008170.pub2.
4
First-line drugs for hypertension.高血压一线用药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4(4):CD001841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001841.pub3.
5
Comparative efficacy of different antihypertensive drug classes for stroke prevention: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.不同类别降压药物预防卒中的比较疗效:一项随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 21;20(2):e0313309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313309. eCollection 2025.
6
First-line diuretics versus other classes of antihypertensive drugs for hypertension.一线利尿剂与其他类别降压药治疗高血压的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 13;7(7):CD008161. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008161.pub3.
7
Antihypertensive treatment for kidney transplant recipients.肾移植受者的降压治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 31;7(7):CD003598. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003598.pub3.
8
Antihypertensive drugs and risk of cancer: network meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of 324,168 participants from randomised trials.降压药物与癌症风险:来自随机试验的 324168 名参与者的网络荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jan;12(1):65-82. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70260-6. Epub 2010 Nov 29.
9
Pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.儿童高血压的药物治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 1;2014(2):CD008117. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008117.pub2.
10
Pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.儿童高血压的药物干预措施。
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):498-580. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1974.

引用本文的文献

1
When blood pressure refuses to budge: exploring the complexity of resistant hypertension.当血压顽固不降时:探索顽固性高血压的复杂性。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 21;10:1211199. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1211199. eCollection 2023.
2
National Heart Center/Saudi Heart Association 2023 Guidelines on the Management of Hypertension.国家心脏中心/沙特心脏协会2023年高血压管理指南。
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2023 Mar 3;35(1):16-39. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1328. eCollection 2023.
3
The Impact of Different Antihypertensive Drugs on Cardiovascular Risk in Isolated Systolic Hypertension with Type 2 Diabetes Patients.
不同降压药物对2型糖尿病单纯收缩期高血压患者心血管风险的影响
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 1;11(21):6486. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216486.
4
Comparative efficacy and safety of fimasartan in patients with hypertension: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.在高血压患者中,非马沙坦的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022 Aug;24(8):971-983. doi: 10.1111/jch.14536. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
5
The Ecology of Antihypertensives in the United States, 1997-2017.1997 - 2017年美国抗高血压药物的使用情况
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(3):699-704. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06214-1. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
6
Quality of evidence supporting Surviving Sepsis Campaign Recommendations.支持脓毒症存活运动推荐的证据质量。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2020 Aug;39(4):497-502. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
7
Diabetic Kidney Disease in Older People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Improving Prevention and Treatment Options.老年人 2 型糖尿病中的糖尿病肾病:改善预防和治疗选择。
Drugs Aging. 2020 Aug;37(8):567-584. doi: 10.1007/s40266-020-00773-y.
8
Resistant hypertension-defining the scope of the problem.耐药性高血压——定义问题的范围。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Jan-Feb;63(1):46-50. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2019.12.006. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
9
Thiazide Use and Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Well-Controlled Blood Pressure.噻嗪类利尿剂的使用与血压控制良好的 2 型糖尿病患者的心血管事件。
Hypertension. 2019 Dec;74(6):1541-1550. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13886. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
10
Treatment of Diabetes in Older Adults: An Endocrine Society* Clinical Practice Guideline.老年人糖尿病治疗:内分泌学会*临床实践指南。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 May 1;104(5):1520-1574. doi: 10.1210/jc.2019-00198.