Suppr超能文献

天然气-汽油双燃料车空气污染物排放因子:第二部分。CO、HC 和 NOx。

Emission factors of air pollutants from CNG-gasoline bi-fuel vehicles: Part II. CO, HC and NOx.

机构信息

Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Key Laboratory for Urban Habitat Environmental Science and Technology, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China; Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2016 Sep 15;565:698-705. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.069. Epub 2016 May 21.

Abstract

The estimation of emission factors (EFs) is the basis of accurate emission inventory. However, the EFs of air pollutants for motor vehicles vary under different operating conditions, which will cause uncertainty in developing emission inventory. Natural gas (NG), considered as a "cleaner" fuel than gasoline, is increasingly being used to reduce combustion emissions. However, information is scarce about how much emission reduction can be achieved by motor vehicles burning NG (NGVs) under real road driving conditions, which is necessary for evaluating the environmental benefits for NGVs. Here, online, in situ measurements of the emissions from nine bi-fuel vehicles were conducted under different operating conditions on the real road. A comparative study was performed for the EFs of black carbon (BC), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbons (HCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) for each operating condition when the vehicles using gasoline and compressed NG (CNG) as fuel. BC EFs were reported in part I. The part II in this paper series reports the influence of operating conditions and fuel types on the EFs of CO, HC and NOx. Fuel-based EFs of CO showed good correlations with speed when burning CNG and gasoline. The correlation between fuel-based HC EFs and speed was relatively weak whether burning CNG or gasoline. The fuel-based NOx EFs moderately correlated with speed when burning CNG, but weakly correlated with gasoline. As for HC, the mileage-based EFs of gasoline vehicles are 2.39-12.59 times higher than those of CNG vehicles. The mileage-based NOx EFs of CNG vehicles are slightly higher than those of gasoline vehicles. These results would facilitate a detailed analysis of the environmental benefits for replacing gasoline with CNG in light duty vehicles.

摘要

排放因子 (EFs) 的估算 是准确排放清单的基础。 然而, 机动车空气污染物的 EFs 在不同的运行条件下有所不同, 这将导致排放清单的开发存在不确定性。 天然气 (NG) 被认为比汽油更“清洁” 的燃料, 越来越多地被用于减少燃烧排放。 然而, 关于在实际道路行驶条件下燃烧 NG 的机动车 (NGV) 可以实现多少减排, 信息仍然很少, 这对于评估 NGV 的环境效益是必要的。 在这里, 在实际道路上的不同运行条件下, 对 9 辆双燃料车的排放进行了在线原位测量。 对使用汽油和压缩 NG (CNG) 作为燃料时, 每种运行条件下的黑碳 (BC) 、 一氧化碳 (CO) 、 碳氢化合物 (HCs) 和氮氧化物 (NOx) 的 EF 进行了对比研究。 第一部分报告了 BC EF 的情况。 本系列论文的第二部分报告了运行条件和燃料类型对 CO 、 HC 和 NOx EF 的影响。 燃烧 CNG 和汽油时, 基于燃料的 CO EF 与速度呈良好相关性。 无论燃烧 CNG 还是汽油, 基于燃料的 HC EF 与速度的相关性都相对较弱。 燃烧 CNG 时, 基于燃料的 NOx EF 与速度中度相关, 但与汽油相关性较弱。 对于 HC, 汽油车的里程基 EF 是 CNG 车的 2.39-12.59 倍。 CNG 车的里程基 NOx EF 略高于汽油车。 这些结果将有助于详细分析在轻型车辆中用 CNG 替代汽油的环境效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验