Philbin Morgan M, Parker Caroline M, Parker Richard G, Wilson Patrick A, Garcia Jonathan, Hirsch Jennifer S
1 HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University , New York, New York.
2 Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University , New York, New York.
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2016 Jun;30(6):282-90. doi: 10.1089/apc.2016.0037. Epub 2016 May 24.
Research has demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention, but little is known about how factors at the individual-, interpersonal-, community-, and structural levels impact PrEP use for black men who have sex with men (BMSM). We advance existing work by examining how all levels of the ecological framework must be addressed for PrEP to be successfully implemented as an effective HIV prevention approach. We interviewed 31 BMSM three times each and 17 community stakeholders once each; interviews were taped, transcribed, and analyzed using the constant comparative method. Factors that influence how BMSM experienced PrEP emerged across all levels of the ecological framework: At the individual level, respondents were wary of giving medication to healthy people and of the potential side-effects. At the interpersonal level, BMSM believed that PrEP use would discourage condom use and that PrEP should only be one option for HIV prevention, not the main option. At the community level, men described not trusting the pharmaceutical industry and described PrEP as an option for others, not for themselves. At the structural level, BMSM talked about HIV and sexuality-related stigmas and how they must overcome those before PrEP engagement. BMSM are a key population in the US National HIV/AIDS Strategy, yet few individuals believe that PrEP would be personally helpful. Our research indicates the urgent need to raise awareness and address structural stigma and policies that could be substantial barriers to the scale-up and implementation of PrEP-related services.
研究已证明暴露前预防(PrEP)在预防艾滋病毒方面的临床有效性,但对于个人、人际、社区和结构层面的因素如何影响男男性行为黑人(BMSM)使用PrEP,人们却知之甚少。我们通过研究生态框架的各个层面都必须如何应对,才能使PrEP作为一种有效的艾滋病毒预防方法得以成功实施,从而推进现有工作。我们对31名BMSM每人进行了三次访谈,对17名社区利益相关者每人进行了一次访谈;访谈进行了录音、转录,并采用持续比较法进行分析。影响BMSM对PrEP体验的因素在生态框架的各个层面都有出现:在个人层面,受访者对给健康人用药以及潜在副作用持谨慎态度。在人际层面,BMSM认为使用PrEP会减少避孕套的使用,并且PrEP应该只是艾滋病毒预防的一种选择,而不是主要选择。在社区层面,男性表示不信任制药行业,并将PrEP描述为其他人的选择,而非自己的选择。在结构层面,BMSM谈到了与艾滋病毒和性取向相关的耻辱感,以及在参与PrEP之前他们必须如何克服这些耻辱感。BMSM是美国国家艾滋病毒/艾滋病战略中的关键人群,但很少有人认为PrEP对自己会有帮助。我们的研究表明,迫切需要提高认识,并应对可能成为扩大和实施与PrEP相关服务的重大障碍的结构性耻辱感和政策。