Van Ocker Jeffrey C, Light Leah L, Olfman Darlene, Rivera Jason
a Register Data and Analytics, Square, Inc ., San Francisco , CA , USA.
b Department of Psychology , Pitzer College , Claremont , CA , USA.
Memory. 2017 Mar;25(3):350-359. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1177089. Epub 2016 May 25.
The study reported here examined the effect of repetition on age differences in associative recognition using a paradigm designed to encourage recollection at test. Young and older adults studied lists of unrelated word pairs presented one, two, four, or eight times. Test lists contained old (intact) pairs, pairs consisting of old words that had been studied with other partners (rearranged lures), and pairs consisting of two unstudied words (new lures). Participants gave old/new responses and then indicated whether their responses were based on details that they could recollect or on familiarity. Older adults exhibited an ironic effect of repetition-an increase in false alarms on rearranged lures with more study opportunities-whereas young adults did not. Older adults also claimed to recall details of the study episode for rearranged lures whose constituent words were presented more frequently, but this was not true for young adults. Although both young and older adults said that they based correct rejections of rearranged lures on memory for details of the study episode, this effect was stronger for young adults. The observed age differences are consistent with older adults having reduced use of recollection in associative recognition tasks.
本文所报告的研究使用了一种旨在在测试时鼓励回忆的范式,考察了重复对联想识别中年龄差异的影响。年轻和年长成年人学习了呈现一次、两次、四次或八次的不相关单词对列表。测试列表包含旧的(完整的)对、由与其他伙伴一起学习过的旧单词组成的对(重新排列的诱饵)以及由两个未学习过的单词组成的对(新诱饵)。参与者给出旧/新反应,然后指出他们的反应是基于能够回忆起的细节还是基于熟悉度。年长成年人表现出一种重复的讽刺效应——随着学习机会增加,对重新排列的诱饵的错误警报增加——而年轻成年人则没有。年长成年人还声称能够回忆起组成单词呈现更频繁的重新排列诱饵的学习情节细节,但年轻成年人并非如此。尽管年轻和年长成年人都说他们对重新排列诱饵的正确拒绝是基于对学习情节细节的记忆,但这种效应在年轻成年人中更强。观察到的年龄差异与年长成年人在联想识别任务中减少使用回忆一致。