• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安大略省长期护理院的人员配备:按盈利状况和连锁所有权划分的差异

Staffing in Ontario's Long-Term Care Homes: Differences by Profit Status and Chain Ownership.

作者信息

Hsu Amy T, Berta Whitney, Coyte Peter C, Laporte Audrey

机构信息

Institute of Health Policy,Management and Evaluation (IHPME),University of Toronto.

出版信息

Can J Aging. 2016 Jun;35(2):175-89. doi: 10.1017/S0714980816000192.

DOI:10.1017/S0714980816000192
PMID:27223577
Abstract

Ontario has the highest proportion of for-profit nursing homes in Canada. These facilities, which are known in Ontario as long-term care (LTC) homes, offer 24-hour custodial as well as nursing care to individuals who cannot live independently. Increasingly, they are also operating as members of multi-facility chains. Using longitudinal data (1996-2011) from the Residential Care Facilities Survey (n = 627), our analysis revealed discernible differences in staffing levels by profit status and chain affiliation. We found for-profit LTC homes - especially those owned by a chain organization - provided significantly fewer hours of care, after adjusting for variation in the residents' care needs. Findings from this study offer new information on the impact of organizational structure on staffing levels in Ontario's LTC homes and have implications for other jurisdictions where a growing presence of private, chain-affiliated operators has been observed.

摘要

安大略省营利性养老院的比例在加拿大最高。在安大略省,这些机构被称为长期护理(LTC)之家,为无法独立生活的个人提供24小时监护和护理服务。它们越来越多地作为多机构连锁的成员开展运营。利用来自住宅护理机构调查(n = 627)的纵向数据(1996 - 2011年),我们的分析揭示了按盈利状况和连锁关系划分的人员配备水平存在明显差异。我们发现,在对居民护理需求的差异进行调整后,营利性长期护理之家——尤其是那些由连锁组织拥有的机构——提供的护理时长显著减少。这项研究的结果提供了关于组织结构对安大略省长期护理之家人员配备水平影响的新信息,并对其他已观察到私人连锁附属运营商日益增多的司法管辖区具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
Staffing in Ontario's Long-Term Care Homes: Differences by Profit Status and Chain Ownership.安大略省长期护理院的人员配备:按盈利状况和连锁所有权划分的差异
Can J Aging. 2016 Jun;35(2):175-89. doi: 10.1017/S0714980816000192.
2
Staffing levels in not-for-profit and for-profit long-term care facilities: does type of ownership matter?非营利性和营利性长期护理机构的人员配备水平:所有权类型重要吗?
CMAJ. 2005 Mar 1;172(5):645-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040131.
3
Observations on institutional long-term care in Ontario: 1996-2002.安大略省机构长期护理观察:1996 - 2002年
Can J Aging. 2005 Spring;24(1):70-84.
4
Do Nursing Home Chain Size and Proprietary Status Affect Experiences With Care?养老院连锁规模和所有权状态会影响护理体验吗?
Med Care. 2016 Mar;54(3):229-34. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000479.
5
Trends in long-term care staffing by facility ownership in British Columbia, 1996 to 2006.1996 年至 2006 年不列颠哥伦比亚省不同所有制长期护理机构员工队伍的发展趋势。
Health Rep. 2010 Dec;21(4):27-33.
6
Does investor-ownership of nursing homes compromise the quality of care?养老院由投资者所有会降低护理质量吗?
Int J Health Serv. 2002;32(2):315-25. doi: 10.2190/EBCN-WECV-C0NT-676R.
7
The effects of ownership and ownership change on nursing home industry costs.所有权及所有权变更对疗养院行业成本的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1996 Aug;31(3):327-46.
8
Do public nursing home care providers deliver higher quality than private providers? Evidence from Sweden.公立养老院护理服务提供者的服务质量是否高于私立提供者?来自瑞典的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 14;17(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2403-0.
9
For-profit versus not-for-profit delivery of long-term care.营利性与非营利性长期护理服务的提供
CMAJ. 2007 Jan 2;176(1):57-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060591.
10
The Impact of Chain Standardization on Nursing Home Staffing.连锁标准化对养老院人员配置的影响。
Med Care. 2018 Dec;56(12):994-1000. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000998.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with pressure ulcer and dehydration in long-term care settings in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省长期护理环境中与压疮和脱水相关的因素。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 31;19(1):e0297588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297588. eCollection 2024.
2
Determinants of regulatory compliance in health and social care services: A systematic review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.卫生和社会保健服务中监管合规的决定因素:使用实施研究综合框架进行的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 13;18(4):e0278007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278007. eCollection 2023.
3
Moral Injury Among Frontline Long-Term Care Staff and Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
新冠疫情期间一线长期护理人员及管理人员的道德伤害
Front Health Serv. 2022 May 11;2:841244. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.841244. eCollection 2022.
4
Just and inclusive end-of-life decision-making for long-term care home residents with dementia: a qualitative study protocol.为长期护理院患有痴呆症的居民做出公正包容的临终决策:一项定性研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Nov 22;21(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01097-x.
5
Psychosocial Work Environment and Well-Being of Direct-Care Staff Under Different Nursing Home Ownership Types: A Systematic Review.不同所有制类型养老院直接护理员工的心理社会工作环境和幸福感:系统评价。
J Appl Gerontol. 2023 Feb;42(2):347-359. doi: 10.1177/07334648221131468. Epub 2022 Oct 9.
6
Therapy-based allied health delivery in residential aged care, trends, factors, and outcomes: a systematic review.基于治疗的联合保健在养老院中的提供、趋势、因素和结果:系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Aug 28;22(1):712. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03386-9.
7
Forecasting Staffing Needs for Ontario's Long-Term Care Sector.预测安大略省长期护理部门的人员配备需求。
Healthc Policy. 2022 Jun;17(SP):91-106. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2022.26852.
8
Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review.长期护理中的提供者护理模式:快速范围综述。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 16;16(7):e0254527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254527. eCollection 2021.
9
'Bare-bones' to 'silver linings': lessons on integrating a palliative approach to care in long-term care in Western Canada.从“一无所有”到“一线希望”:在加拿大西部的长期护理中融入姑息治疗方法的经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 28;21(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06606-x.
10
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
CMAJ. 2020 Nov 30;192(48):E1662-E1672. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.201197-f.