• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1996 年至 2006 年不列颠哥伦比亚省不同所有制长期护理机构员工队伍的发展趋势。

Trends in long-term care staffing by facility ownership in British Columbia, 1996 to 2006.

机构信息

Department of Family Practice Research Office at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1L8.

出版信息

Health Rep. 2010 Dec;21(4):27-33.

PMID:21269009
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Long-term care facilities (nursing homes) in British Columbia consist of a mix of for-profit, not-for-profit non-government, and not-for-profit health-region-owned establishments. This study assesses the extent to which staffing levels have changed by facility ownership category.

DATA AND METHODS

With data from Statistics Canada's Residential Care Facilities Survey, various types of care hours per resident-day were examined from 1996 through 2006 for the province of British Columbia. Random effects linear regression modeling was used to investigate the effect of year and ownership on total nursing hours per resident-day, adjusting for resident demographics, case mix, and facility size.

RESULTS

From 1996 to 2006, crude mean total nursing hours per resident-day rose from 1.95 to 2.13 hours in for-profit facilities (p = 0.06); from 1.99 to 2.48 hours in not-for-profit non-government facilities (p < 0.001); and from 2.25 to 3.30 hours in not-for-profit health-region-owned facilities (p < 0.001). The adjusted rate of increase in total nursing hours per resident-day was significantly greater in not-for-profit health-region-owned facilities.

INTERPRETATION

While total nursing hours per resident-day have increased in all facility groups, the rate of increase was greater in not-for-profit facilities operated by health authorities.

摘要

背景

不列颠哥伦比亚省的长期护理机构(养老院)由营利性、非营利性非政府和非营利性卫生区域所有的机构混合组成。本研究评估了不同所有权类别的机构的人员配备水平变化程度。

数据和方法

利用来自加拿大统计局的《住宿护理设施调查》的数据,从 1996 年至 2006 年对不列颠哥伦比亚省的各种类型的每位居民每天的护理时间进行了检查。使用随机效应线性回归模型,在调整了居民人口统计学、病例组合和设施规模后,研究了年份和所有权对每位居民每天的总护理时间的影响。

结果

从 1996 年到 2006 年,营利性机构的每居民每天的总护理时间从 1.95 小时增加到 2.13 小时(p=0.06);非营利性非政府机构从 1.99 小时增加到 2.48 小时(p<0.001);非营利性卫生区域所有的机构从 2.25 小时增加到 3.30 小时(p<0.001)。每居民每天的总护理时间的调整增长率在非营利性卫生区域所有的机构中显著更高。

解释

虽然所有机构群体的每位居民每天的总护理时间都有所增加,但非营利性医疗机构的增长速度更快。

相似文献

1
Trends in long-term care staffing by facility ownership in British Columbia, 1996 to 2006.1996 年至 2006 年不列颠哥伦比亚省不同所有制长期护理机构员工队伍的发展趋势。
Health Rep. 2010 Dec;21(4):27-33.
2
Staffing levels in not-for-profit and for-profit long-term care facilities: does type of ownership matter?非营利性和营利性长期护理机构的人员配备水平:所有权类型重要吗?
CMAJ. 2005 Mar 1;172(5):645-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040131.
3
Nursing home characteristics associated with resident transfers to emergency departments.与居民转至急诊科相关的养老院特征。
Can J Aging. 2014 Mar;33(1):38-48. doi: 10.1017/S0714980813000615. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
4
The effects of ownership and ownership change on nursing home industry costs.所有权及所有权变更对疗养院行业成本的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1996 Aug;31(3):327-46.
5
The Impact of Chain Standardization on Nursing Home Staffing.连锁标准化对养老院人员配置的影响。
Med Care. 2018 Dec;56(12):994-1000. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000998.
6
Observations on institutional long-term care in Ontario: 1996-2002.安大略省机构长期护理观察:1996 - 2002年
Can J Aging. 2005 Spring;24(1):70-84.
7
Long-Term Care Facility Ownership and Acute Hospital Service Use in British Columbia, Canada: A Retrospective Cohort Study.长期护理机构所有权与不列颠哥伦比亚省加拿大急性医院服务使用情况:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Oct;21(10):1490-1496. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.04.034. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
8
The relationship of California's Medicaid reimbursement system to nurse staffing levels.加利福尼亚州医疗补助报销系统与护士人员配备水平的关系。
Med Care. 2012 Oct;50(10):836-42. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318264e4ce.
9
Medicaid payment rates, case-mix reimbursement, and nursing home staffing--1996-2004.医疗补助支付率、病例组合报销及疗养院人员配备——1996 - 2004年
Med Care. 2008 Jan;46(1):33-40. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181484197.
10
Care outcomes in long-term care facilities in British Columbia, Canada. Does ownership matter?加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省长期护理机构的护理结果。所有权重要吗?
Med Care. 2006 Oct;44(10):929-35. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000223477.98594.97.

引用本文的文献

1
Safer Care for Older Persons in (residential) Environments (SCOPE): a pragmatic controlled trial of a care aide-led quality improvement intervention.(居住)环境中老年人更安全护理(SCOPE):护理助手主导的质量改进干预的实用对照试验。
Implement Sci. 2023 Mar 29;18(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01259-8.
2
The association of facility ownership with COVID-19 outbreaks in long-term care homes in British Columbia, Canada: a retrospective cohort study.加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省长期护理院中设施所有权与 COVID-19 爆发的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ Open. 2023 Mar 21;11(2):E267-E273. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220022. Print 2023 Mar-Apr.
3
Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review.
长期护理中的提供者护理模式:快速范围综述。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 16;16(7):e0254527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254527. eCollection 2021.
4
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
CMAJ. 2020 Nov 30;192(48):E1698-E1699. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.201714-f.
5
COVID-19 and long-term care facilities: Does ownership matter?2019冠状病毒病与长期护理机构:所有权重要吗?
CMAJ. 2020 Aug 17;192(33):E961-E962. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.201714. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
6
The Changing Landscape of Continuing Care in Alberta: Staff and Resident Characteristics in Supportive Living and Long-Term Care.阿尔伯塔省持续护理的变化格局:支持性生活和长期护理中的工作人员及居民特征
Healthc Policy. 2018 Aug;14(1):44-56. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2018.25549.
7
Prescriptive or Interpretive Regulation at the Frontlines of Care Work in the "Three Worlds" of Canada, Germany and Norway.加拿大、德国和挪威“三个世界”护理工作前线的规范性或解释性监管
Labour. 2016 Spring;77:37-71. doi: 10.1353/llt.2016.0029.
8
Dancing the Two-Step in Ontario's Long-term Care Sector: More Deterrence-oriented Regulation = Ownership and Management Consolidation.安大略省长期护理部门的两步舞:更多以威慑为导向的监管 = 所有权和管理合并。
Stud Polit Econ. 2015 Mar 1;95(1):29-58. doi: 10.1080/19187033.2015.11674945.
9
Who is looking after Mom and Dad? Unregulated workers in Canadian long-term care homes.谁在照顾爸爸妈妈?加拿大长期护理院的非正规员工。
Can J Aging. 2015 Mar;34(1):47-59. doi: 10.1017/S0714980814000506. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
10
Complaints in for-profit, non-profit and public nursing homes in two Canadian provinces.加拿大两个省份营利性、非营利性和公立养老院的投诉情况。
Open Med. 2011;5(4):e183-92. Epub 2011 Nov 15.