Vederhus John-Kåre, Pripp Are Hugo, Clausen Thomas
Addiction Unit, Sørlandet Hospital HF, Kristiansand, Norway.
Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology (OCBE), Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Subst Abuse. 2016 May 18;10:31-7. doi: 10.4137/SART.S39192. eCollection 2016.
Quality of life (QoL) in patients admitted to a general hospital was compared with those admitted to a detoxification unit for the treatment of substance use disorder (SUD). This study combines data from two separate data collections: a cross-sectional study in a general hospital unit (somatic sample, N = 519) and a follow-up study in a detoxification unit (SUD sample, N = 140). A total of 659 patients recruited during 2008-2013 were included in this study. All patients completed a generic QoL questionnaire at inclusion, and the SUD sample also completed it at the six-month follow-up. SUD patients experienced comparably low physical QoL and had significantly lower psychological, social, and existential QoL domain scores when compared with the somatic sample. Mental distress and having a SUD were the major factors explaining variations in QoL, with both influencing QoL negatively. In the SUD sample, QoL improved moderately at the six-month follow-up with less improvement for the domain relationship to a partner. To facilitate the recovery of SUD patients, clinicians must view their patients' situation holistically and invest efforts into the different life domains affected by poor QoL.
将综合医院收治的患者与戒毒单位收治的物质使用障碍(SUD)患者的生活质量(QoL)进行了比较。本研究结合了两个独立数据收集的数据:综合医院科室的横断面研究(躯体样本,N = 519)和戒毒单位的随访研究(SUD样本,N = 140)。本研究纳入了2008年至2013年期间招募的共659名患者。所有患者在纳入时均完成了一份通用的生活质量问卷,SUD样本在六个月随访时也完成了该问卷。与躯体样本相比,SUD患者的身体生活质量较低,心理、社会和生存生活质量领域得分显著更低。精神痛苦和患有SUD是解释生活质量差异的主要因素,两者均对生活质量有负面影响。在SUD样本中,六个月随访时生活质量有适度改善,与伴侣关系领域的改善较少。为促进SUD患者的康复,临床医生必须全面看待患者的情况,并对受生活质量差影响的不同生活领域投入精力。