Suppr超能文献

支付方对罕见病药物的待遇是否有所不同?

Are payers treating orphan drugs differently?

作者信息

Cohen Joshua P, Felix Abigail

机构信息

Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Mark Access Health Policy. 2014 Jan 15;2. doi: 10.3402/jmahp.v2.23513. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Some orphan drugs can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars annually per patient. As a result, payer sensitivity to the cost of orphan drugs is rising, particularly in light of increased numbers of new launches in recent years. In this article, we examine payer coverage in the United States, England and Wales, and the Netherlands of outpatient orphan drugs approved between 1983 and 2012, as well as the 11 most expensive orphan drugs.

METHODS

We collected data from drug regulatory agencies as well as payers and drug evaluation authorities.

RESULTS

We found that orphan drugs have more coverage restrictions than non-orphan drugs in all three jurisdictions. From an economic perspective, the fact that a drug is an orphan product or has a high per-unit price per se should not imply a special kind of evaluation by payers, or necessarily the imposition of more coverage restrictions.

CONCLUSION

Payers should consider the same set of decision criteria that they do with respect to non-orphan drugs: disease severity, availability of treatment alternatives, level of unmet medical need, and cost-effectiveness, criteria that justifiably may be taken into account and traded off against one another in prescribing and reimbursement decisions for orphan drugs.

摘要

背景

一些罕见病药物每位患者每年的花费可能高达数十万美元。因此,支付方对罕见病药物成本的敏感度不断上升,尤其是鉴于近年来新上市药物数量的增加。在本文中,我们研究了1983年至2012年间在美国、英格兰和威尔士以及荷兰获批的门诊罕见病药物的支付方覆盖情况,以及11种最昂贵的罕见病药物。

方法

我们从药品监管机构以及支付方和药品评估机构收集了数据。

结果

我们发现,在所有这三个辖区,罕见病药物的覆盖限制都比非罕见病药物更多。从经济角度来看,一种药物是罕见病用药或本身单价高昂这一事实,不应意味着支付方会进行特殊评估,也不一定意味着会施加更多的覆盖限制。

结论

支付方应采用与非罕见病药物相同的一套决策标准:疾病严重程度、治疗替代方案的可及性、未满足的医疗需求水平以及成本效益,这些标准在罕见病药物的处方和报销决策中合理地可以被考虑并相互权衡。

相似文献

1
Are payers treating orphan drugs differently?支付方对罕见病药物的待遇是否有所不同?
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2014 Jan 15;2. doi: 10.3402/jmahp.v2.23513. eCollection 2014.
10
Comparing patient access to pharmaceuticals in the UK and US.比较英国和美国患者获取药品的情况。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2006;5(3):177-87. doi: 10.2165/00148365-200605030-00004.

引用本文的文献

2
Disentangling the Cost of Orphan Drugs Marketed in the United States.厘清美国上市的罕见病药物成本
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 13;11(4):558. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11040558.
4
A systematic review of moral reasons on orphan drug reimbursement.孤儿药补偿的道德理由系统评价。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Jun 30;16(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-01925-y.
5
Determinants of Orphan Drug Prices in Germany.德国孤儿药价格的决定因素。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Apr;38(4):397-411. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00872-8.

本文引用的文献

7
Access to orphan drugs despite poor quality of clinical evidence.尽管临床证据质量差,仍可获得孤儿药。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Apr;71(4):488-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03877.x.
9
Priority setting for orphan drugs: an international comparison.优先考虑孤儿药:国际比较。
Health Policy. 2011 Apr;100(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.09.008. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
10
Are Medicare plans complying with CMS regulation?医疗保险计划是否符合 CMS 规定?
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2008 Apr;8(2):133-9. doi: 10.1586/14737167.8.2.133.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验