Suppr超能文献

医疗保险计划是否符合 CMS 规定?

Are Medicare plans complying with CMS regulation?

机构信息

Senior Research Fellow, Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, 75 Kneeland Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA 02111, USA.

出版信息

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2008 Apr;8(2):133-9. doi: 10.1586/14737167.8.2.133.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have put forth guidance recommending coverage of 75% of the costs of 'all or substantially all' drugs in six therapeutic categories deemed medically necessary for Medicare beneficiaries: anticonvulsants, antidepressants, antineoplastics, antipsychotics, HIV/AIDS and immunosuppressants. For 2007 filings, we analyzed compliance by 36 leading prescription drug plans with the CMS guidance.

METHODS

Using databases at the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, we identified 201 drugs approved by the US FDA between 1962 and 2007 in the six therapeutic categories mentioned above. For these drugs, we gathered data from 36 prescription drug plans on prices, formulary placement, cost-sharing and conditions of reimbursement. Our primary source for formulary data was the Formulary Finder on the CMS website.

RESULTS

Plans are not complying with the 'all or substantially all' guidance. Across all six categories, an average of 17% of drugs are not covered, with a higher percentage of exclusions among antineoplastics and immunosuppressants. In addition, 18% of covered drugs have one or more conditions of reimbursement, with prior authorization leading the way at 15%, even in categories in which the use of prior authorization is not sanctioned (e.g., HIV/AIDS).

CONCLUSIONS

Noncompliance with CMS guidance suggests CMS oversight may be lacking. Further research must be performed to determine whether, on balance, formulary exclusions and restrictions in these categories are harmful to patient outcomes.

摘要

目的

美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)提出了一项指导意见,建议为被认为对医疗保险受益人在六个治疗领域具有医学必要性的“全部或大部分”药物(抗惊厥药、抗抑郁药、抗肿瘤药、抗精神病药、艾滋病毒/艾滋病和免疫抑制剂)支付 75%的费用。对于 2007 年的申报,我们分析了 36 家领先的处方药计划对 CMS 指导的遵守情况。

方法

我们使用塔夫茨药物开发研究中心的数据库,确定了在上述六个治疗领域内,1962 年至 2007 年间获得美国 FDA 批准的 201 种药物。对于这些药物,我们从 36 个处方药计划中收集了价格、处方集位置、费用分担和报销条件的数据。我们处方集数据的主要来源是 CMS 网站上的处方集查找器。

结果

计划不符合“全部或大部分”指导原则。在所有六个类别中,平均有 17%的药物未被覆盖,抗肿瘤药和免疫抑制剂的排除率更高。此外,18%的覆盖药物有一个或多个报销条件,其中事先授权占 15%,即使在事先授权不受支持的类别(如艾滋病毒/艾滋病)也是如此。

结论

对 CMS 指导的不遵守表明 CMS 的监督可能不足。必须进行进一步的研究,以确定在这些类别中,处方集排除和限制是否在总体上对患者的结果有害。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验