Suppr超能文献

孕产妇死亡率和发病率的水平及原因

Levels and Causes of Maternal Mortality and Morbidity

作者信息

Filippi Véronique, Chou Doris, Ronsmans Carine, Graham Wendy, Say Lale

Abstract

In September 2000, 189 world leaders signed a declaration on eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to improve the lives of women, men, and children in their respective countries (United Nations General Assembly 2000). Goal 5a calls for the reduction of maternal mortality by 75 percent between 1990 and 2015. Goal 5a was supplemented by MDG 5b on universal access to contraception. MDGs 5a and 5b have been important catalysts for the reductions in maternal mortality levels that have been achieved in many settings. Despite substantial progress, challenges remain. The majority of low-income countries (LICs), particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa and postconflict settings, have not made sufficient progress to meet MDG 5a. The post-2015 agenda on sustainable development is broader than the MDG agenda, with a greater number of nonhealth goals and a strong focus on inequity reduction; the new agenda includes an absolute reduction in maternal mortality as a marker of progress. This new indicator is expected to be framed as targets for preventable maternal deaths (Bustreo and others 2013; Gilmore and Camhe Gebreyesus 2012). The International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) defines maternal death as “[The] death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of the end of pregnancy, irrespective of the duration and site of the pregnancy, from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management, but not from accidental or incidental causes” (WHO 2010, 156). Subsequent guidance on the classification of causes includes nine groups of underlying causes (box 3.1) (WHO 2012). Despite the increased global focus on maternal mortality as a public health issue, little detailed knowledge is available on the levels of maternal mortality and morbidity and the causes of their occurrence. A large proportion of maternal deaths occur in settings in which vital registration is deficient and many sick women do not access services. To obtain data on population levels of maternal mortality in these settings, special surveys are needed, including the following (Abouzahr 1999): Reproductive Age Mortality Studies, which investigate all reproductive age deaths. Demographic and Health Surveys, which interview women and men about their siblings’ survival in adulthood to identify deaths of sisters during or following pregnancy (the siblings are from the same mother) (Ahmed and others 2014). Smaller studies, which use the indirect sisterhood method. National investigations, which add questions to censuses. Verbal autopsy studies, which provide information on causes and circumstances of deaths. Maternal death studies require large sample sizes; recent national-level data are often nonexistent, and maternal mortality tracking relies principally on mathematical models. This lack of data has led to a repeated call for countries to improve their vital registration systems and to strengthen other mechanisms for informing intervention strategies, such as the maternal death surveillance and response system proposed within the new accountability framework (WHO 2013). Accountability remains a central part of United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon’s updated global strategy to accelerate progress for women’s, children’s, and adolescent’s health (http://www.everywomaneverychild.org/global-strategy-2). The accountability framework, developed under the 2010 global strategy to accelerate women’s and children’s health, included recommendations for improvements in resource tracking; international and national oversight; and data monitoring, including maternal mortality (Commission on Information and Accountability for Women’s and Children’s Health 2011). Information on maternal morbidity is frequently collected in hospital studies, which are only representative of patients who seek care. Community-based studies are rare in LICs and suffer from methodological limitations, particularly when they rely on self-reporting of obstetric complications. Self-reporting is known not to agree sufficiently with medical diagnoses to estimate prevalence. In particular, studies validating retrospective interview surveys find that women without medical diagnoses of complications during labor frequently reported symptoms of morbidity during surveys, a phenomenon that can lead to an overestimation of prevalence (Ronsmans and others 1997; Souza and others 2008). In addition, community-based studies have focused on direct obstetric complications; little is known about the nature and incidence of many indirect complications that are aggravated by pregnancy. For example, reliable population-based estimates of the occurrence of asthma during pregnancy do not exist in LICs. This chapter addresses the extent and nature of maternal mortality and morbidity and serves as a backdrop to subsequent chapters on obstetric interventions in LICs. It introduces the determinants of maternal mortality and morbidity and their strategic implications. The next section uses the most recent estimates from the World Health Organization (WHO) to show that women face a higher risk of maternal death in Sub-Saharan Africa. It discusses the recent findings of a WHO meta-analysis that show that the most important direct causes are hemorrhage, hypertension, abortion, and sepsis; however, the proportion of deaths due to indirect causes is increasing in most parts of the world. The chapter then focuses on pregnancy-related complications, including nonfatal illnesses such as antenatal and postpartum depression, using the findings from systematic reviews conducted by the Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group. The most common contributors to maternal morbidity are probably anemia and depression at the community level, but prolonged and obstructed labor results in the highest burden of disease because of fistulas (IHME 2013). The chapter discusses the broader determinants of maternal morbidity and mortality, and then concludes by making the links with the interventions highlighted in chapter 7 in this volume (Gülmezoglu and others 2016).

摘要

2000年9月,189位世界领导人签署了一份关于八项千年发展目标(MDGs)的宣言,以改善各自国家妇女、男子和儿童的生活(联合国大会,2000年)。目标5a要求在1990年至2015年期间将孕产妇死亡率降低75%。目标5b对目标5a进行了补充,即普及避孕措施。千年发展目标5a和5b是许多地区孕产妇死亡率下降的重要推动因素。尽管取得了重大进展,但挑战依然存在。大多数低收入国家(LICs),特别是撒哈拉以南非洲地区和冲突后地区,在实现千年发展目标5a方面进展不足。2015年后可持续发展议程比千年发展目标议程更为广泛,包含更多非卫生目标,并高度关注减少不平等现象;新议程将孕产妇死亡率的绝对降低作为进展的一项指标。这一新指标预计将设定为可预防孕产妇死亡的目标(布斯特雷奥等人,2013年;吉尔摩和卡姆赫·盖布雷耶苏斯,2012年)。《国际疾病分类》(ICD - 10)将孕产妇死亡定义为“妇女在怀孕期间或妊娠结束后42天内死亡,无论妊娠时间长短和部位如何,因与妊娠或其管理相关或由其加重的任何原因导致死亡,但不包括意外或偶然原因”(世界卫生组织,2010年,第156页)。随后关于死因分类的指南包括九组潜在原因(方框3.1)(世界卫生组织,2012年)。尽管全球日益关注孕产妇死亡率这一公共卫生问题,但关于孕产妇死亡率和发病率水平及其发生原因的详细信息却很少。很大一部分孕产妇死亡发生在人口动态登记不完善且许多患病妇女无法获得服务的地区。为了获取这些地区孕产妇死亡率的人口数据,需要开展特别调查,包括以下几种(阿布扎尔,1999年):生殖年龄死亡率研究,调查所有生殖年龄死亡情况。人口与健康调查,通过询问妇女和男子其兄弟姐妹成年后的生存情况,以确定姐妹在孕期或产后的死亡情况(兄弟姐妹来自同一母亲)(艾哈迈德等人,2014年)。规模较小的研究,采用间接姐妹法。国家调查,在人口普查中增加相关问题。口头尸检研究,提供有关死亡原因和情况的信息。孕产妇死亡研究需要大样本量;近期国家层面的数据往往不存在,孕产妇死亡率追踪主要依赖数学模型。数据的缺乏导致人们反复呼吁各国改善其人口动态登记系统,并加强其他为干预策略提供信息的机制,如新问责框架中提议的孕产妇死亡监测与应对系统(世界卫生组织,2013年)。问责制仍然是联合国秘书长潘基文更新后的加速妇女、儿童和青少年健康全球战略的核心部分(http://www.everywomaneverychild.org/global-strategy-2)。在2010年加速妇女和儿童健康全球战略下制定的问责框架,包括了在资源追踪、国际和国家监督以及数据监测(包括孕产妇死亡率)方面的改进建议(妇女和儿童健康信息与问责委员会,2011年)。关于孕产妇发病率的信息通常在医院研究中收集,而这些研究仅代表寻求医疗服务的患者。在低收入国家,基于社区的研究很少,且存在方法学上的局限性,特别是当它们依赖于对产科并发症的自我报告时。众所周知,自我报告与医学诊断的一致性不足以估计患病率。特别是,验证回顾性访谈调查的研究发现,在分娩期间没有医学诊断出并发症的妇女在调查中经常报告发病症状,这种现象可能导致患病率的高估(朗斯曼斯等人,1997年;苏扎等人,2008年)。此外,基于社区的研究主要关注直接产科并发症;对于许多因妊娠而加重的间接并发症的性质和发生率了解甚少。例如,低收入国家缺乏基于人群的关于孕期哮喘发生情况的可靠估计。本章阐述了孕产妇死亡率和发病率的程度及性质,并作为后续关于低收入国家产科干预章节的背景。它介绍了孕产妇死亡率和发病率的决定因素及其战略意义。下一节将利用世界卫生组织(WHO)的最新估计数据表明,撒哈拉以南非洲地区的妇女面临更高的孕产妇死亡风险。它讨论了世界卫生组织一项荟萃分析的最新结果,该结果表明最重要的直接原因是出血、高血压、堕胎和败血症;然而,在世界大部分地区,间接原因导致的死亡比例正在上升。本章随后将利用儿童健康流行病学参考小组进行的系统评价结果,重点关注与妊娠相关的并发症,包括产前和产后抑郁症等非致命疾病。在社区层面,孕产妇发病的最常见因素可能是贫血和抑郁症,但由于瘘管病,产程延长和产道梗阻导致的疾病负担最高(健康指标与评估研究所,2013年)。本章讨论了孕产妇发病和死亡的更广泛决定因素,最后将其与本卷第7章强调的干预措施建立联系(居尔梅佐格鲁等人,2016年)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验