Suppr超能文献

在津巴布韦进行的一项II期随机对照试验,比较PrePex™器械与镊子引导下手术环切术的安全性、手术时间和成本。

A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex™ Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe.

作者信息

Tshimanga Mufuta, Mangwiro Tonderayi, Mugurungi Owen, Xaba Sinokuthemba, Murwira Munyaradzi, Kasprzyk Danuta, Montaño Daniel E, Nyamukapa Daisy, Tambashe Basile, Chatikobo Pesanai, Gundidza Patricia, Gwinji Gerald

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Department of Surgery, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 May 26;11(5):e0156220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156220. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS promote MC (male circumcision) as a key HIV prevention strategy where HIV prevalence and incidence are high and MC prevalence is low. In Zimbabwe, to achieve the 1.26 million circumcisions needed to be performed by 2015 to achieve optimal MC coverage, a new approach was needed. The primary objective of the current trial was to assess the performance (safety, procedure time, and cost) of the PrePex device compared to forceps-guided surgical circumcision.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

This Phase II, randomized, open-label trial in Zimbabwe involved healthy, non-circumcised adult male volunteers who were randomly assigned to the PrePex device (n = 160) or surgical arm (n = 80). Three doctors and 4 nurses, all certified on both circumcision methods, performed the procedures. The PrePex device procedure involves a plastic ring with a rubber O-ring that necrotizes the foreskin to facilitate easy and minimally invasive removal. Total procedure time was the primary endpoint. Adverse event (AE) data were also gathered for 90 days post-procedure. All 80 participants in the surgical arm and 158 participants in the PrePex arm achieved complete circumcision. The total procedure time for the PrePex device was approximately one-third of the total surgical procedure (4.8 minutes, Standard Deviation [SD]: 1.2 versus 14.6 minutes; SD: 4.2; p<0.00001). There were 2 AEs for 2 participants (rate of 1.3%, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.0025-4.53%), which were resolved with simple intervention. The AEs were device related, including 1 case of pain leading to device removal and 1 case of removal of the device.

CONCLUSIONS

The trial supports previous studies' conclusions that the PrePex procedure is safe, quick, easy to apply, and effective in terms of procedure time as an alternative to traditional surgical circumcision. The PrePex device has great potential for use in overburdened health systems and in resource-limited settings and is recommended for use in rapid scale-up of adult MC in Zimbabwe.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01956370.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织(WHO)和联合国艾滋病规划署将男性包皮环切术(MC)作为一项关键的艾滋病预防策略加以推广,适用于艾滋病病毒感染率和发病率较高且男性包皮环切术普及率较低的地区。在津巴布韦,为了在2015年实现126万例包皮环切术以达到最佳的包皮环切术覆盖率,需要一种新方法。当前试验的主要目的是评估PrePex器械与钳夹引导下手术环切术相比的性能(安全性、手术时间和成本)。

方法与结果

这项在津巴布韦进行的II期随机开放标签试验纳入了健康的未行包皮环切术的成年男性志愿者,他们被随机分配至PrePex器械组(n = 160)或手术组(n = 80)。三名医生和四名护士进行了手术,他们均获得了两种包皮环切术方法的认证。PrePex器械手术使用一个带有橡胶O形环的塑料环,使包皮坏死以便于轻松且微创地切除。总手术时间是主要终点。术后90天也收集了不良事件(AE)数据。手术组的所有80名参与者和PrePex组的158名参与者均成功完成了包皮环切术。PrePex器械的总手术时间约为手术环切术总时间的三分之一(4.8分钟,标准差[SD]:1.2,而手术环切术为14.6分钟;SD:4.2;p<0.00001)。2名参与者出现2例不良事件(发生率为1.3%,95%置信区间:0.0025 - 4.53%),通过简单干预得以解决。这些不良事件与器械相关,包括1例因疼痛导致器械移除和1例器械自行脱落。

结论

该试验支持了先前研究的结论,即PrePex手术安全、快速、易于实施,且在手术时间方面作为传统手术环切术的替代方法是有效的。PrePex器械在负担过重的卫生系统和资源有限的环境中有很大的应用潜力,建议在津巴布韦快速扩大成人包皮环切术规模时使用。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01956370。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b20c/4881993/581307595eab/pone.0156220.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验