• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reach and cost-effectiveness of the PrePex device for safe male circumcision in Uganda.在乌干达,使用 PrePex 设备进行安全男性割礼的可及性和成本效益。
PLoS One. 2013 May 22;8(5):e63134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063134. Print 2013.
2
Adverse events profile of PrePex a non-surgical device for adult male circumcision in a Ugandan urban setting.PrePex(一种用于成年男性包皮环切术的非手术器械)在乌干达城市环境中的不良事件概况。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 28;9(1):e86631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086631. eCollection 2014.
3
Cost analysis of integrating the PrePex medical device into a voluntary medical male circumcision program in Zimbabwe.将PrePex医疗器械纳入津巴布韦自愿男性医学包皮环切术项目的成本分析。
PLoS One. 2014 May 6;9(5):e82533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082533. eCollection 2014.
4
Skills training of health workers in the use of a non surgical device (PrePex) for adult Safe Male Circumcision.对卫生工作者进行使用非手术器械(PrePex)开展成年男性安全包皮环切术的技能培训。
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 13;9(8):e104893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104893. eCollection 2014.
5
A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex™ Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe.在津巴布韦进行的一项II期随机对照试验,比较PrePex™器械与镊子引导下手术环切术的安全性、手术时间和成本。
PLoS One. 2016 May 26;11(5):e0156220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156220. eCollection 2016.
6
Evaluating the cost of adult voluntary medical male circumcision in a mixed (surgical and PrePex) site compared to a hypothetical PrePex-only site in South Africa.评估在南非一个采用混合方式(手术和PrePex)的地点与一个假设仅采用PrePex的地点进行成人自愿男性包皮环切术的成本。
Glob Health Action. 2015 Dec 15;8:29116. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.29116. eCollection 2015.
7
Adverse event profile of a mature voluntary medical male circumcision programme performing PrePex and surgical procedures in Zimbabwe.在津巴布韦开展PrePex和外科手术的成熟自愿男性包皮环切项目的不良事件概况。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Feb 21;19(1):21394. doi: 10.7448/IAS.20.1.21394.
8
The PrePex device is unlikely to achieve cost-savings compared to the forceps-guided method in male circumcision programs in sub-Saharan Africa.与非洲撒哈拉以南地区的夹钳引导方法相比,PrePex 设备不太可能在男性割礼项目中实现成本节约。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053380. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
9
Comparative Cost Analysis of Surgical and PrePex Device Male Circumcision in Zimbabwe and Mozambique.津巴布韦和莫桑比克外科手术与PrePex器械男性包皮环切术的成本比较分析
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016 Jun 1;72 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S96-S100. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000797.
10
The safety and acceptance of the PrePex device for non-surgical adult male circumcision in Rakai, Uganda. A non-randomized observational study.乌干达拉凯地区用于成年男性非手术包皮环切的PrePex装置的安全性与可接受性:一项非随机观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 21;9(8):e100008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100008. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge and Attitudes of Circumcision among Adult Male Clients Receiving Care in a Teaching Hospital in Kigali City, Rwanda.卢旺达基加利市一家教学医院成年男性患者对包皮环切术的认知与态度
Rwanda J Med Health Sci. 2024 Jul 31;7(2):359-371. doi: 10.4314/rjmhs.v7i2.21. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Implementing quality management strategies improves clinical quality as a voluntary medical male circumcision program in Namibia matures: a process analysis.实施质量管理策略可提高临床质量,因为纳米比亚的自愿男性割礼项目逐渐成熟:过程分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 29;23(1):1044. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10016-6.
3
Adverse event profile and associated factors following surgical voluntary medical male circumcision in two regions of Namibia, 2015-2018.2015-2018 年纳米比亚两个地区行外科自愿男性割礼后的不良事件概况及相关因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 20;16(10):e0258611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258611. eCollection 2021.
4
Reducing provider workload while preserving patient safety via a two-way texting intervention in Zimbabwe's voluntary medical male circumcision program: study protocol for an un-blinded, prospective, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial.通过津巴布韦志愿男性包皮环切计划中的双向短信干预来减少医务人员工作量,同时保护患者安全:一项非盲、前瞻性、非劣效性、随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Jul 23;20(1):451. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3470-9.
5
Cost-effectiveness of HIV Prevention Interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review.撒哈拉以南非洲地区艾滋病预防干预措施的成本效益:一项系统评价
EClinicalMedicine. 2019 May 20;10:10-31. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.04.006. eCollection 2019 Apr.
6
Timing of adverse events among voluntary medical male circumcision clients: Implications from routine service delivery in Zimbabwe.自愿男性包皮环切术客户不良事件的时间:来自津巴布韦常规服务提供的启示。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 7;13(9):e0203292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203292. eCollection 2018.
7
Implementing voluntary medical male circumcision using an innovative, integrated, health systems approach: experiences from 21 districts in Zimbabwe.采用创新、综合的卫生系统方法实施自愿男性医学包皮环切术:来自津巴布韦21个地区的经验。
Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1414997. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1414997.
8
Safety and efficacy of the PrePex device in HIV-positive men: A single-arm study in Zimbabwe.PrePex 装置在 HIV 阳性男性中的安全性和有效性:津巴布韦的一项单臂研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 8;12(12):e0189146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189146. eCollection 2017.
9
Long term post PrePex male circumcision outcomes in an urban population in Uganda: a cohort study.乌干达城市人口中PrePex男性包皮环切术的长期术后结果:一项队列研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Oct 30;10(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2845-9.
10
Adverse event profile of a mature voluntary medical male circumcision programme performing PrePex and surgical procedures in Zimbabwe.在津巴布韦开展PrePex和外科手术的成熟自愿男性包皮环切项目的不良事件概况。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Feb 21;19(1):21394. doi: 10.7448/IAS.20.1.21394.

本文引用的文献

1
Adverse events profile of PrePex a non-surgical device for adult male circumcision in a Ugandan urban setting.PrePex(一种用于成年男性包皮环切术的非手术器械)在乌干达城市环境中的不良事件概况。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 28;9(1):e86631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086631. eCollection 2014.
2
One-arm, open-label, prospective, cohort field study to assess the safety and efficacy of the PrePex device for scale-up of nonsurgical circumcision when performed by nurses in resource-limited settings for HIV prevention.一项单臂、开放性、前瞻性、队列实地研究,旨在评估 PrePex 装置在资源有限环境中由护士进行非手术性包皮环切术以预防 HIV 时的安全性和有效性。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013 Jul 1;63(3):315-22. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31828e6412.
3
Mass safe male circumcision: early lessons from a Ugandan urban site - a case study.大规模安全男性包皮环切术:来自乌干达一个城市地区的早期经验教训——一项案例研究
Pan Afr Med J. 2012;13:88. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
4
Voluntary medical male circumcision: an HIV prevention priority for PEPFAR.自愿男性包皮环切术:PEPFAR 的艾滋病预防重点。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012 Aug 15;60 Suppl 3(0 3):S88-95. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31825cac4e.
5
Medical male circumcision for HIV/AIDS prevention in Uganda - the cost of disposable versus re-usable circumcision kits.乌干达通过医学男性包皮环切术预防艾滋病毒/艾滋病——一次性与可重复使用包皮环切工具包的成本
Trop Doct. 2012 Jan;42(1):5-7. doi: 10.1258/td.2011.110297. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
6
Voluntary medical male circumcision: modeling the impact and cost of expanding male circumcision for HIV prevention in eastern and southern Africa.自愿男性包皮环切术:模拟扩大东非和南非男性包皮环切术预防艾滋病毒的影响和成本。
PLoS Med. 2011 Nov;8(11):e1001132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001132. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
7
Safety and efficacy of the PrePex device for rapid scale-up of male circumcision for HIV prevention in resource-limited settings.在资源有限的环境下,使用 PrePex 设备快速扩大男性包皮环切术以预防艾滋病毒的安全性和有效性。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011 Dec 15;58(5):e127-34. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182354e65.
8
Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial.乌干达拉凯地区男性包皮环切术预防男性感染艾滋病毒的随机试验。
Lancet. 2007 Feb 24;369(9562):657-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60313-4.
9
Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial.肯尼亚基苏木年轻男性包皮环切术预防艾滋病病毒感染的随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2007 Feb 24;369(9562):643-56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60312-2.
10
Cost-effectiveness of male circumcision for HIV prevention in a South African setting.南非背景下男性包皮环切术预防艾滋病病毒的成本效益分析
PLoS Med. 2006 Dec;3(12):e517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030517.

在乌干达,使用 PrePex 设备进行安全男性割礼的可及性和成本效益。

Reach and cost-effectiveness of the PrePex device for safe male circumcision in Uganda.

机构信息

International Medical Group, Kampala, Uganda.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 May 22;8(5):e63134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063134. Print 2013.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0063134
PMID:23717402
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3661578/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Modelling, supported by the USAID Health Policy Initiative and UNAIDS, performed in 2011, indicated that Uganda would need to perform 4.2 million medical male circumcisions (MMCs) to reach 80% prevalence. Since 2010 Uganda has completed 380,000 circumcisions, and has set a national target of 1 million for 2013.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relative reach and cost-effectiveness of PrePex compared to the current surgical SMC method and to determine the effect that this might have in helping to achieve the Uganda national SMC targets.

METHODS

A cross-sectional descriptive cost-analysis study conducted at International Hospital Kampala over ten weeks from August to October 2012. Data collected during the performance of 625 circumcisions using PrePex was compared to data previously collected from 10,000 circumcisions using a surgical circumcision method at the same site. Ethical approval was obtained.

RESULTS

The moderate adverse events (AE) ratio when using the PrePex device was 2% and no severe adverse events were encountered, which is comparable to the surgical method, thus the AE rate has no effect on the reach or cost-effectiveness of PrePex. The unit cost to perform one circumcision using PrePex is $30.55, 35% ($7.90) higher than the current surgical method, but the PrePex method improves operator efficiency by 60%, meaning that a team can perform 24 completed circumcisions compared to 15 by the surgical method. The cost-effectiveness of PrePex, comparing the cost of performing circumcisions to the future cost savings of potentially averted HIV infections, is just 2% less than the current surgical method, at a device cost price of $20.

CONCLUSION

PrePex is a viable SMC tool for scale-up with unrivalled potential for superior reach, however national targets can only be met with effective demand creation and availability of trained human resource.

摘要

引言

美国国际开发署卫生政策倡议和艾滋病规划署支持的建模工作表明,乌干达需要进行 420 万例男性医学包皮环切术(MMC)才能达到 80%的流行率。自 2010 年以来,乌干达已经完成了 38 万例包皮环切术,并设定了 2013 年 100 万例的国家目标。

目的

评估 PrePex 与当前外科 SMC 方法相比的相对可达性和成本效益,并确定这可能对帮助实现乌干达国家 SMC 目标产生的影响。

方法

这是一项在 2012 年 8 月至 10 月的 10 周内于坎帕拉国际医院进行的横断面描述性成本分析研究。比较了使用 PrePex 进行的 625 例包皮环切术的数据,以及在同一地点使用外科包皮环切术方法收集的之前 10000 例包皮环切术的数据。获得了伦理批准。

结果

使用 PrePex 设备的中度不良事件(AE)比例为 2%,没有发生严重不良事件,这与外科方法相当,因此 AE 率对 PrePex 的可达性或成本效益没有影响。使用 PrePex 进行一次包皮环切术的单位成本为 30.55 美元,比当前的外科方法高 35%(7.90 美元),但 PrePex 方法将操作人员的效率提高了 60%,这意味着一个团队可以完成 24 例包皮环切术,而外科方法只能完成 15 例。将 PrePex 进行包皮环切术的成本与潜在避免的 HIV 感染的未来成本节约进行比较,其成本效益仅比当前的外科方法低 2%,在设备价格为 20 美元时。

结论

PrePex 是一种可行的 SMC 工具,具有无与伦比的扩展潜力,但要实现国家目标,必须有效创造需求并提供经过培训的人力资源。