Wang Zhiyi, Wang Zhibin, Yu Qing, Xi Haitao, Weng Jie, Du Xiaohong, Chen Daqing, Ma Jianshe, Mei Jin, Chen Chan
Department of Emergency Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital & Yuying Children's Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China.
Anatomy Department & Institute of Bioscaffold Transplantation and Immunology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China.
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016 Oct;104(10):2567-75. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35794. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
Decellularization processes may variably distort or degrade extracellular matrix (ECM) structure. In this study, two perfusion routes (PR) were tested on SD rat lung samples. One decellularization protocol, PR1, was perfused through the pulmonary artery. The other decellularization protocol, PR2, was perfused through the trachea. Both decellularization protocols were used by the same detergent-based (sodium dodecyl sulphate and Triton X-100) with different flow continuous perfusion. There was no visible difference in vessel architecture between PR1- and PR2-decellularized scaffold. However, the airway structure and alveoli architecture of pulmonary decellularized scaffolds generated through PR2 at a flow rate of 8 mL/min were destroyed partly when compared to that in native lung and PR1-decellularized scaffold. Ultramicroscopic assessment of scaffolds was similar in both protocols and showed filamentous ECM with preserved fiber disposition and structure. Histological analysis and immunostaining showed no detectable cells remaining in the pulmonary scaffolds compare with native lung. The DNA concentration was significantly reduced in the decellularized scaffolds compared to the native lungs. A549 cells reseeded onto decellularized pulmonary scaffolds were no significant difference between PR1 and PR2 in cell viability, p > 0.05. We conclude that under the same high flow velocity status, perfusion decellularization through the pulmonary artery may be an optimal pathway to obtain decellularized scaffolds for pulmonary regeneration. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 104A: 2567-2575, 2016.
去细胞化过程可能会不同程度地扭曲或降解细胞外基质(ECM)结构。在本研究中,对SD大鼠肺样本测试了两种灌注途径(PR)。一种去细胞化方案PR1通过肺动脉进行灌注。另一种去细胞化方案PR2通过气管进行灌注。两种去细胞化方案均使用相同的基于洗涤剂(十二烷基硫酸钠和曲拉通X - 100)的不同流量持续灌注。PR1和PR2去细胞化支架之间的血管结构没有明显差异。然而,与天然肺和PR1去细胞化支架相比,以8 mL/min流速通过PR2生成的肺去细胞化支架的气道结构和肺泡结构部分被破坏。两种方案对支架的超微结构评估相似,显示丝状ECM,纤维排列和结构得以保留。组织学分析和免疫染色显示,与天然肺相比,肺支架中未检测到残留细胞。与天然肺相比,去细胞化支架中的DNA浓度显著降低。接种到去细胞化肺支架上的A549细胞在PR1和PR2之间的细胞活力没有显著差异,p>0.05。我们得出结论,在相同的高流速状态下,通过肺动脉进行灌注去细胞化可能是获得用于肺再生的去细胞化支架的最佳途径。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。©2016威利期刊公司。《生物医学材料研究杂志》A部分:104A:2567 - 2575,2016年。