Floyd Erin G, von Versen-Höynck Frauke, Liu Jing, Chi Yueh-Yun, Fleischmann Raquel R, Baker Valerie L
Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hinman 335, 45 Kellogg Bldg, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Stanford University Medical Center, 1195 W Fremont Ave., Sunnyvale, CA, 94087, USA.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016 Aug;33(8):993-9. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0733-1. Epub 2016 May 26.
The aim of this study is to report challenges encountered when conducting inter-institutional data collection of obstetric (prenatal and postpartum) and delivery outcomes for research purposes and to propose solutions for enhanced efficiency.
Data were collected from women who consented to collection of obstetric and delivery records for an observational study of pregnancy and delivery outcomes following infertility treatment. We analyzed key issues relevant to improving efficiency of obstetric and delivery data collection via quantification of effort (such as number of calls and faxes) required to obtain records from different types of obstetric clinics and hospitals before and after utilization of a revised authorization.
At time of analysis, records were successfully collected from 320 of the 451 participants who had delivered. The 320 participants received obstetric care at 63 institutions and delivered at 27 hospitals, with 168 (52.5 %) delivering at institutions other than home facility. At time of consent (8 weeks gestation), 155 of 320 (48.5 %) correctly predicted where they would receive obstetric care and 176 (55 %) where they would delivery. Most facilities (nearly 90 %) rejected our original authorization, but most (90 %) accepted the revised authorization described in this manuscript.
Collecting records is time-consuming but important as over 50 % of our participants received care outside of the home facility. To efficiently collect outside records, we recommend that researchers interested in maternal and neonatal outcomes consider the guidelines outlined in this manuscript. This report also provides strong evidence of the need to develop data sharing through electronic health records for research purposes.
本研究旨在报告为研究目的进行机构间产科(产前和产后)及分娩结局数据收集时遇到的挑战,并提出提高效率的解决方案。
从同意收集产科和分娩记录的女性中收集数据,用于一项关于不孕症治疗后妊娠和分娩结局的观察性研究。我们通过量化在使用修订后的授权前后从不同类型的产科诊所和医院获取记录所需的工作量(如电话和传真数量),分析了与提高产科和分娩数据收集效率相关的关键问题。
在分析时,已成功从451名已分娩参与者中的320人处收集到记录。这320名参与者在63家机构接受产科护理,并在27家医院分娩,其中168人(52.5%)在非其所属机构分娩。在同意参与时(妊娠8周),320名参与者中有155人(48.5%)正确预测了他们将接受产科护理的地点,176人(55%)正确预测了他们将分娩的地点。大多数机构(近90%)拒绝了我们最初的授权,但大多数(90%)接受了本手稿中描述的修订后的授权。
收集记录耗时但很重要,因为我们超过半数以上的参与者在非其所属机构接受护理。为了高效收集外部记录,我们建议对孕产妇和新生儿结局感兴趣的研究人员考虑本手稿中概述的指南。本报告还提供了有力证据,证明有必要为研究目的通过电子健康记录开展数据共享。