Suppr超能文献

[When should peridural analgesia be started in induced labor? Result of a randomized prospective study].

作者信息

Balladur A, Tribalat S, Jaouen E, Tochon C, Lewin D

机构信息

Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Centre Hospitalier, Poissy.

出版信息

J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1989;18(2):249-54.

PMID:2723355
Abstract

Two groups of women who had labours induced were compared in a prospective randomised trial: The first group of 41 patients (group 1) in whom the epidural was started at the beginning of induction. A second group of 47 patients (group 2) in whom the epidural was only started when labour became "active" and induction had been effective. The length of labour and the obstetrical results were identically the same in both groups: at least there was no significant difference. There was no special benefit from waiting until labour started properly before injecting the epidural. This result made us look retrospectively to women whose labours had been induced and who might have benefited from the epidural being started late. The only significant difference was found apparently between primipara and multipara, and this was quite independent of the state of the cervix and the lower segment at the onset: it would appear to be better to put the epidural analgesia in once the labour has started in primiparous patients where as in multiparous ones on the other hand there seems to be a better effect if the epidural is started as soon as induction is started.

摘要

相似文献

6
[Epidural analgesia. Women's viewpoint].[硬膜外镇痛。女性视角]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1982;11(4):523-33.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验