• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估不同洗涤剂和消毒剂清除及杀灭传统生物膜中微生物的能力。

Evaluation of the ability of different detergents and disinfectants to remove and kill organisms in traditional biofilm.

作者信息

da Costa Luciano Cristiana, Olson Nancy, Tipple Anaclara Ferreira Veiga, Alfa Michelle

机构信息

Department of Nursing, University Federal of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.

St. Boniface Research Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2016 Nov 1;44(11):e243-e249. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.03.040. Epub 2016 May 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2016.03.040
PMID:27234012
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to assess the ability of different detergent and disinfectant combinations to eradicate bacteria in traditional biofilm.

METHODS

Enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were used to develop biofilm over 8 days. The biofilm on each minimum biofilm eradication concentration peg contained 8 log colony forming units (CFU)/cm of both bacteria. The detergents evaluated were as follows: Prolystica Enzymatic 2X, Prolystica Neutral 2X, Neodisher, and Endozime Bio-Clean. The disinfectants evaluated were as follows: glutaraldehyde, accelerated hydrogen peroxide, and ortho-phthalaldehyde. Biofilm removal was evaluated using viable count, protein and carbohydrate quantitation, and scanning electron microscopy.

RESULTS

Only Prolystica Enzymatic 2X and Endozime Bio-Clean killed both E faecalis (3.90 log CFU/mL reduction) and P aeruginosa (3.96 log CFU/mL reduction) in suspension. None of the detergents tested could provide >1 log CFU/cm reduction for bacteria within biofilm. Any combination of detergent and high-level disinfectant reduced the level of both E faecalis and P aeruginosa within biofilm by 3-5 log CFU/cm. Although the combination of Endozime Bio-Clean and glutaraldehyde provided a 6 log reduction, it could not eliminate both bacteria within biofilm.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that if biofilm accumulates in flexible endoscope channels during repeated rounds of reprocessing, then neither the detergent nor high-level disinfectant will provide the expected level of bacterial removal or killing.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是评估不同洗涤剂和消毒剂组合对清除传统生物膜中细菌的能力。

方法

使用粪肠球菌和铜绿假单胞菌在8天内形成生物膜。每个最低生物膜清除浓度柱上的生物膜含有两种细菌各8 log菌落形成单位(CFU)/cm。评估的洗涤剂如下:Prolystica酶促2X、Prolystica中性2X、Neodisher和Endozime生物清洁液。评估的消毒剂如下:戊二醛、加速过氧化氢和邻苯二甲醛。使用活菌计数、蛋白质和碳水化合物定量以及扫描电子显微镜评估生物膜的去除情况。

结果

只有Prolystica酶促2X和Endozime生物清洁液能杀死悬浮液中的粪肠球菌(减少3.90 log CFU/mL)和铜绿假单胞菌(减少3.96 log CFU/mL)。所测试的洗涤剂均不能使生物膜内的细菌减少>1 log CFU/cm。洗涤剂和高水平消毒剂的任何组合均可使生物膜内的粪肠球菌和铜绿假单胞菌水平降低3 - 5 log CFU/cm。虽然Endozime生物清洁液和戊二醛的组合可使细菌减少6 log,但不能清除生物膜内的两种细菌。

结论

我们的数据表明,如果在反复的再处理过程中生物膜积聚在软性内窥镜通道中,那么洗涤剂和高水平消毒剂均无法达到预期的细菌清除或杀灭水平。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the ability of different detergents and disinfectants to remove and kill organisms in traditional biofilm.评估不同洗涤剂和消毒剂清除及杀灭传统生物膜中微生物的能力。
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Nov 1;44(11):e243-e249. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.03.040. Epub 2016 May 24.
2
A new buildup biofilm model that mimics accumulation of material in flexible endoscope channels.一种模拟柔性内窥镜通道中物质积累的新型生物膜形成模型。
J Microbiol Methods. 2016 Aug;127:224-229. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.06.022. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
3
The polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) channel model of cyclic-buildup biofilm and traditional biofilm: The impact of friction, and detergent on cleaning and subsequent high-level disinfection.聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)通道模型的周期性生物膜积累和传统生物膜:摩擦力和清洁剂对清洁和随后高水平消毒的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;41(2):172-180. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.306.
4
A novel polytetrafluoroethylene-channel model, which simulates low levels of culturable bacteria in buildup biofilm after repeated endoscope reprocessing.一种新型聚四氟乙烯通道模型,可模拟重复内镜处理后生物膜中可培养细菌数量较低的情况。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Sep;86(3):442-451.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 May 24.
5
Simulated-Use Polytetrafluorethylene Biofilm Model: Repeated Rounds of Complete Reprocessing Lead to Accumulation of Organic Debris and Viable Bacteria.模拟使用聚四氟乙烯生物膜模型:反复进行彻底的再处理会导致有机碎屑和存活细菌的积累。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Nov;38(11):1284-1290. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.215. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
6
A new hydrogen peroxide--based medical-device detergent with germicidal properties: comparison with enzymatic cleaners.一种具有杀菌特性的新型过氧化氢基医疗器械洗涤剂:与酶清洁剂的比较。
Am J Infect Control. 2001 Jun;29(3):168-77. doi: 10.1067/mic.2001.113616.
7
Modeling microbial survival in buildup biofilm for complex medical devices.模拟复杂医疗器械生物膜形成过程中微生物的存活情况。
BMC Infect Dis. 2009 May 8;9:56. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-56.
8
Assessment of enzymatic cleaning agents and disinfectants against bacterial biofilms.酶清洁剂和消毒剂对细菌生物膜的评估。
J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2004 Feb 18;7(1):55-64.
9
Behavior of Listeria monocytogenes in a multi-species biofilm with Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium and control through sanitation procedures.肠李斯特菌在屎肠球菌和粪肠球菌混合生物膜中的行为及通过卫生程序控制。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2015 May 4;200:5-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
10
Mimicking disinfection and drying of biofilms in contaminated endoscopes.模拟污染内镜中生物膜的消毒和干燥。
J Hosp Infect. 2010 Dec;76(4):345-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.07.008. Epub 2010 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
A dynamic flow model mimicking duodenoscope reprocessing after bacterial contamination for translational research.一种用于转化研究的动态流动模型,模拟细菌污染后十二指肠镜的再处理过程。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2022 Sep 13;2(1):e153. doi: 10.1017/ash.2022.294. eCollection 2022.
2
Mild Positive Pressure Improves the Efficacy of Benzalkonium Chloride against Biofilm.轻度正压可提高苯扎氯铵对生物膜的疗效。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Sep 9;9(9):461. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9090461.
3
Evaluation of Enzymatic Cleaning on Food Processing Installations and Food Products Bacterial Microflora.
酶清洗对食品加工设备及食品细菌微生物群落的评估
Front Microbiol. 2020 Aug 11;11:1827. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01827. eCollection 2020.
4
The endolysin of the Acinetobacter baumannii phage vB_AbaP_D2 shows broad antibacterial activity.鲍曼不动杆菌噬菌体 vB_AbaP_D2 的溶菌素具有广泛的抗菌活性。
Microb Biotechnol. 2021 Mar;14(2):403-418. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13594. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
5
Turbulent fluid flow is a novel closed-system sample extraction method for flexible endoscope channels of various inner diameters.湍流流是一种新颖的封闭系统样品提取方法,适用于各种内径的软性内窥镜通道。
J Microbiol Methods. 2020 Jan;168:105782. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2019.105782. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
6
On-site comparison of an enzymatic detergent and a non-enzymatic detergent-disinfectant for routine manual cleaning of flexible endoscopes.用于软性内窥镜常规手工清洗的酶洗涤剂和非酶洗涤剂消毒剂的现场比较。
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Apr;7(4):E412-E420. doi: 10.1055/a-0838-4995. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
7
Behavior of Foodborne Pathogens Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus in Mixed-Species Biofilms Exposed to Biocides.食源性病原体单增李斯特菌和金黄色葡萄球菌在混合物种生物膜中对消毒剂的行为。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Nov 30;84(24). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02038-18. Print 2018 Dec 15.