• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

威胁会吸引注意力,但并非自动如此:自上而下的目标会调节对威胁性干扰物的注意力定向。

Threat captures attention, but not automatically: Top-down goals modulate attentional orienting to threat distractors.

作者信息

Vromen Joyce M G, Lipp Ottmar V, Remington Roger W, Becker Stefanie I

机构信息

School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.

School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, 6845, Australia.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Oct;78(7):2266-79. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1142-3.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-016-1142-3
PMID:27234013
Abstract

The rapid orienting of attention to potential threats has been proposed to proceed outside of top-down control. However, paradigms that have been used to investigate this have struggled to separate the rapid orienting of attention (i.e. capture) from the later disengagement of focal attention that may be subject to top-down control. Consequently, it remains unclear whether and to what extent orienting to threat is contingent on top-down goals. The current study manipulated the goal-relevance of threat distractors (spiders), whilst a strict top-down attentional set was encouraged by presenting the saliently colored target and the threat distracter simultaneously for a limited time. The goal-relevance of threatening distractors was manipulated by including a spider amongst the possible target stimuli (Experiment 1: spider/cat targets) or excluding it (Experiment 2: bird/fish targets). Orienting and disengagement were disentangled by cueing attention away from or towards the threat prior to its onset. The results indicated that the threatening spider distractors elicited rapid orienting of attention when spiders were potentially goal-relevant (Experiment 1) but did so much less when they were irrelevant to the task goal (Experiment 2). Delayed disengagement from the threat distractors was even more strongly contingent on the task goal and occurred only when a spider was a possible target. These results highlight the role of top-down goals in attentional orienting to and disengagement from threat.

摘要

有人提出,对潜在威胁的注意力快速定向是在自上而下的控制之外进行的。然而,用于研究这一现象的范式一直难以将注意力的快速定向(即捕获)与随后可能受自上而下控制的焦点注意力脱离区分开来。因此,尚不清楚对威胁的定向是否以及在多大程度上取决于自上而下的目标。本研究操纵了威胁干扰物(蜘蛛)与目标的相关性,同时通过在有限时间内同时呈现颜色突出的目标和威胁干扰物,鼓励形成严格的自上而下的注意力定势。通过在威胁出现之前将注意力从威胁上引开或引向威胁,来区分定向和脱离。结果表明,当蜘蛛可能与目标相关时(实验1:蜘蛛/猫目标),具有威胁性的蜘蛛干扰物会引发注意力的快速定向,但当它们与任务目标无关时(实验2:鸟/鱼目标),引发的程度要小得多。从威胁干扰物上延迟脱离甚至更强烈地取决于任务目标,并且只有当蜘蛛是可能的目标时才会发生。这些结果突出了自上而下的目标在对威胁的注意力定向和脱离中的作用。

相似文献

1
Threat captures attention, but not automatically: Top-down goals modulate attentional orienting to threat distractors.威胁会吸引注意力,但并非自动如此:自上而下的目标会调节对威胁性干扰物的注意力定向。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Oct;78(7):2266-79. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1142-3.
2
The spider does not always win the fight for attention: Disengagement from threat is modulated by goal set.蜘蛛并非总能在争夺注意力的战斗中获胜:对威胁的脱离受目标设定的调节。
Cogn Emot. 2015;29(7):1185-96. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.969198. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
3
ERP correlates of attentional processing in spider fear: evidence of threat-specific hypervigilance.蜘蛛恐惧中注意加工的事件相关电位关联:特定威胁过度警觉的证据。
Cogn Emot. 2018 May;32(3):437-449. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1310717. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
4
Attentional capture by alcohol-related stimuli may be activated involuntarily by top-down search goals.酒精相关刺激引起的注意捕获可能是由自上而下的搜索目标无意识激活的。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Jul;235(7):2087-2099. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-4906-8. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
5
When spiders appear suddenly: spider-phobic patients are distracted by task-irrelevant spiders.当蜘蛛突然出现时:患有蜘蛛恐惧症的患者会被与任务无关的蜘蛛分散注意力。
Behav Res Ther. 2008 Feb;46(2):174-87. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.10.010. Epub 2007 Nov 17.
6
Cross-modal influences on attentional asymmetries: Additive effects of attentional orienting and arousal.跨模态对注意不对称性的影响:注意定向与唤醒的叠加效应。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Feb;96:39-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
7
The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.自上而下的空间注意在偶然注意捕获中的作用。
Psychophysiology. 2016 May;53(5):650-62. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12615. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
8
Testing a goal-driven account of involuntary attentional capture by threat.测试基于目标的威胁引起非自愿注意力捕获的理论。
Emotion. 2020 Jun;20(4):572-589. doi: 10.1037/emo0000565. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
9
An effective attentional set for a specific colour does not prevent capture by infrequently presented motion distractors.针对特定颜色的有效注意集并不能防止被偶尔出现的运动干扰物捕获。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(7):1340-65. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1080738. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
10
Expectancy and attention bias to spiders: Dissecting anticipation and allocation processes using ERPs.对蜘蛛的预期和注意偏向:使用 ERP 技术剖析预期和分配过程。
Psychophysiology. 2024 Jun;61(6):e14546. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14546. Epub 2024 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptual Decision-Making Regarding Phylogenetically Salient Stimuli.关于系统发育显著刺激的知觉决策
Affect Sci. 2024 Sep 26;6(1):145-158. doi: 10.1007/s42761-024-00271-z. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Thinking about it: the impact of COVID-19-related stimuli on prospective memory.思考一下:与 COVID-19 相关的刺激对前瞻性记忆的影响。
PeerJ. 2023 Nov 16;11:e16389. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16389. eCollection 2023.
3
Social processing modulates the initial allocation of attention towards angry faces: evidence from the N2pc component.
社会处理调节了对愤怒面孔的初始注意力分配:来自 N2pc 成分的证据。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023 Nov 30;18(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsad070.
4
Now you see it, now you don't: Relevance of threat enhances social anxiety-linked attentional bias to angry faces, but relevance of neutral information attenuates it.现在你看到了,现在你又看不到了:威胁的相关性增强了与社交焦虑相关的对愤怒面孔的注意力偏向,但中性信息的相关性则减弱了这种偏向。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 28;17(7):e0271752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271752. eCollection 2022.
5
An adaptive view of attentional control.注意控制的自适应观点。
Am Psychol. 2021 Dec;76(9):1410-1422. doi: 10.1037/amp0000917.
6
Specificity of spiders among fear- and disgust-eliciting arthropods: Spiders are special, but phobics not so much.蜘蛛在引起恐惧和厌恶的节肢动物中的特异性:蜘蛛很特别,但恐惧症患者并非如此。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 23;16(9):e0257726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257726. eCollection 2021.
7
The past, present, and future of selection history.选择史的过去、现在和未来。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Nov;130:326-350. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
8
The priority of goal-relevant information and evolutionarily threatening information in early attention processing:Evidence from behavioral and ERP study.早期注意加工中与目标相关的信息和进化威胁信息的优先级:来自行为和 ERP 研究的证据。
Sci Rep. 2020 May 14;10(1):8008. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65062-5.
9
Automatic and controlled attentional capture by threatening stimuli.威胁性刺激对注意力的自动和控制性捕获。
Heliyon. 2019 May 22;5(5):e01752. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01752. eCollection 2019 May.
10
The influence of affective state on exogenous attention to emotional distractors: behavioral and electrophysiological correlates.情绪状态对外源注意情绪干扰物的影响:行为和电生理相关性。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 14;7(1):8068. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07249-x.