Universidad de la República del Uruguay, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 14;7(1):8068. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07249-x.
The interplay between exogenous attention to emotional distractors and the baseline affective state has not been well established yet. The present study aimed to explore this issue through behavioral measures and event-related potentials (ERPs). Participants (N = 30) completed a digit categorization task depicted over negative, positive or neutral distractor background pictures, while they experienced negative, positive and neutral affective states elicited by movie scenes. Behavioral results showed higher error rates and longer reaction times for negative distractors than for neutral and positive ones, irrespective of the current emotional state. Neural indices showed that the participants' affective state modulated N1 amplitudes, irrespective of distractor type, while the emotional charge of distractors modulated N2, irrespective of the emotional state. Importantly, an interaction of state and distractor type was observed in LPP. These results demonstrate that exogenous attention to emotional distractors is independent from modulating effects of the emotional baseline state at early, automatic stages of processing. However, attention to emotional distractors and affective state interact at later latencies.
外源性注意情绪干扰物与基线情绪状态之间的相互作用尚未得到很好的证实。本研究旨在通过行为测量和事件相关电位(ERP)来探讨这个问题。参与者(N=30)在观看负面、正面或中性干扰背景图片的同时完成数字分类任务,同时体验由电影场景引起的负面、正面和中性情绪状态。行为结果表明,无论当前情绪状态如何,负面干扰物的错误率更高,反应时间更长。神经指标表明,参与者的情绪状态调节了 N1 振幅,而与干扰物类型无关,而干扰物的情绪负荷则调节了 N2,而与情绪状态无关。重要的是,在 LPP 中观察到状态和干扰物类型的相互作用。这些结果表明,对外源性情绪干扰物的注意与情绪基线状态的调节作用在处理的早期自动阶段是独立的。然而,情绪干扰物和情绪状态在后期潜伏期相互作用。