• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Performance of tests of significance based on stratification by a multivariate confounder score or by a propensity score.

作者信息

Cook E F, Goldman L

机构信息

Joint Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(4):317-24. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90036-x.

DOI:10.1016/0895-4356(89)90036-x
PMID:2723692
Abstract

Stratification by a multivariate confounder score or by a propensity score has been proposed for the multi-confounder situations that are commonly encountered in epidemiologic evaluations of the effects of a treatment or a triage decision. However, the use of these scores in clinical research has been limited, perhaps in part because of the concern that the stated level of statistical significance may be exaggerated when there is a high degree of correlation between the exposure and the set of confounders. We present a specific example and computer simulations to suggest that exaggeration of statistical significance occurs only under unusual circumstances when the correlation between the exposure and the confounders is extreme. Our simulations also suggest that an analysis based on stratification by a propensity score is less affected by high correlation between the exposure and the confounders than is an analysis based on a multivariate confounder score.

摘要

相似文献

1
Performance of tests of significance based on stratification by a multivariate confounder score or by a propensity score.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(4):317-24. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90036-x.
2
Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders.事件数量较少且存在多个混杂因素时逻辑回归与倾向得分的比较。
Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Aug 1;158(3):280-7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg115.
3
Asymmetric stratification. An outline for an efficient method for controlling confounding in cohort studies.不对称分层。一种在队列研究中控制混杂因素的有效方法概述。
Am J Epidemiol. 1988 Mar;127(3):626-39. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114838.
4
Weaknesses of goodness-of-fit tests for evaluating propensity score models: the case of the omitted confounder.评估倾向得分模型的拟合优度检验的弱点:遗漏混杂因素的情况。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Apr;14(4):227-38. doi: 10.1002/pds.986.
5
Confounder-adjusted estimates of the risk difference using propensity score-based weighting.基于倾向评分加权的混杂因素调整风险差估计值。
Stat Med. 2010 Dec 30;29(30):3126-36. doi: 10.1002/sim.3935.
6
Marginal Structural Models for Risk or Prevalence Ratios for a Point Exposure Using a Disease Risk Score.利用疾病风险评分模型估计点暴露下风险比或患病率的边缘结构模型
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 May 1;188(5):960-966. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz025.
7
Performance of disease risk scores, propensity scores, and traditional multivariable outcome regression in the presence of multiple confounders.存在多种混杂因素时,疾病风险评分、倾向评分和传统多变量结局回归的表现。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Sep 1;174(5):613-20. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr143. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
8
Regularized Regression Versus the High-Dimensional Propensity Score for Confounding Adjustment in Secondary Database Analyses.二次数据库分析中用于混杂因素调整的正则化回归与高维倾向评分比较
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Oct 1;182(7):651-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv108. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
9
Some insights into Miettinen's multivariate confounder score approach to case-control study analysis.对米耶蒂宁病例对照研究分析的多变量混杂因素评分方法的一些见解。
Epidemiol Community Health. 1979 Mar;33(1):104-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.33.1.104.
10
A Propensity-score-based Fine Stratification Approach for Confounding Adjustment When Exposure Is Infrequent.一种基于倾向评分的精细分层方法,用于在暴露不频繁时进行混杂因素调整。
Epidemiology. 2017 Mar;28(2):249-257. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000595.

引用本文的文献

1
Methods to Adjust for Confounding in Test-Negative Design COVID-19 Effectiveness Studies: Simulation Study.检测阴性设计的 COVID-19 有效性研究中调整混杂因素的方法:模拟研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 27;9:e58981. doi: 10.2196/58981.
2
Effects of Adopting Preventive Drug Lists on Medication Costs and Disparities by Income Over 2 Years: A Natural Experiment for Translation in Diabetes (NEXT-D) Study.采用预防性药物清单对两年内药物成本及收入差异的影响:糖尿病转化自然实验(NEXT-D)研究
Diabetes Care. 2025 Mar 1;48(3):341-352. doi: 10.2337/dc24-0361.
3
Data Integration in Causal Inference.
因果推断中的数据整合
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat. 2023 Jan-Feb;15(1). doi: 10.1002/wics.1581. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
4
Propensity score regression analysis of oesophageal adenocarcinoma treatment with surgery alone or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.单纯手术或新辅助化疗治疗食管腺癌的倾向评分回归分析。
BJS Open. 2020 Aug;4(4):593-600. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50287. Epub 2020 May 6.
5
Association of initial e-cigarette and other tobacco product use with subsequent cigarette smoking in adolescents: a cross-sectional, matched control study.电子烟和其他烟草制品初始使用与青少年后续吸烟的关联性:一项横断面、匹配对照研究。
Tob Control. 2021 Mar;30(2):212-220. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055283. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
6
Analytic and Data Sharing Options in Real-World Multidatabase Studies of Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Medical Products.真实世界多数据库研究中关于医疗产品的比较有效性和安全性的分析和数据共享选项。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Apr;107(4):834-842. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1754. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
7
Marginal Structural Models for Risk or Prevalence Ratios for a Point Exposure Using a Disease Risk Score.利用疾病风险评分模型估计点暴露下风险比或患病率的边缘结构模型
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 May 1;188(5):960-966. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz025.
8
Validity of Privacy-Protecting Analytical Methods That Use Only Aggregate-Level Information to Conduct Multivariable-Adjusted Analysis in Distributed Data Networks.仅使用汇总级信息在分布式数据网络中进行多变量调整分析的隐私保护分析方法的有效性。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Apr 1;188(4):709-723. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy265.
9
Propensity score analysis of 18-FDG PET/CT-enhanced staging in patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer.18-FDG PET/CT 增强分期在食管癌手术患者中的倾向评分分析。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Apr;46(4):801-809. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4118-9. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
10
Pesticide Use and Asthma in Alberta Grain Farmers.阿尔伯塔省谷物种植者的农药使用与哮喘。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 15;15(3):526. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030526.