• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对米耶蒂宁病例对照研究分析的多变量混杂因素评分方法的一些见解。

Some insights into Miettinen's multivariate confounder score approach to case-control study analysis.

作者信息

Pike M C, Anderson J, Day N

出版信息

Epidemiol Community Health. 1979 Mar;33(1):104-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.33.1.104.

DOI:10.1136/jech.33.1.104
PMID:467396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1060913/
Abstract

We have studied Miettinen's multivariate confounder score method of controlling confounding in case-control studies both theoretically and by simulation. The main conclusion to be drawn from out results is that the method will in many practical situations seriously exaggerate the statistical significance achieved, and its use is not to be recommended.

摘要

我们已经从理论和模拟两方面研究了米耶蒂宁在病例对照研究中控制混杂因素的多变量混杂因素评分方法。从我们的结果中得出的主要结论是,在许多实际情况下,该方法会严重夸大所达到的统计显著性,因此不建议使用。

相似文献

1
Some insights into Miettinen's multivariate confounder score approach to case-control study analysis.对米耶蒂宁病例对照研究分析的多变量混杂因素评分方法的一些见解。
Epidemiol Community Health. 1979 Mar;33(1):104-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.33.1.104.
2
On Miettinen's multivariate confounder score.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Mar;51(3):233-6. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00283-7.
3
Miettinen's epidemiology: quo vadis?米耶蒂宁的流行病学:何去何从?
Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19(8):737-9. doi: 10.1023/b:ejep.0000036589.52693.1a.
4
Performance of tests of significance based on stratification by a multivariate confounder score or by a propensity score.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(4):317-24. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90036-x.
5
Interpretation and estimation of summary ratios under heterogeneity.异质性下汇总比率的解释与估计。
Stat Med. 1982 Jul-Sep;1(3):217-27. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780010304.
6
Efficiency of case-control studies with multiple controls per case: continuous or dichotomous data.每个病例设置多个对照的病例对照研究效率:连续型或二分法数据
Biometrics. 1975 Sep;31(3):643-9.
7
Invariants and noninvariants in the concept of interdependent effects.相互依存效应概念中的不变量与非不变量。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1988 Apr;14(2):125-9. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1945.
8
Estimation and application of population attributable fraction in ecological studies.人群归因分数在生态研究中的估计和应用。
Environ Health. 2019 Jun 13;18(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12940-019-0492-4.
9
A heuristic approach to the formulas for population attributable fraction.一种推导人群归因分数公式的启发式方法。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Jul;55(7):508-14. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.7.508.
10
Sample size for testing differences in proportions for the paired-sample design.配对样本设计中比例差异检验的样本量。
Biometrics. 1987 Mar;43(1):207-11.

引用本文的文献

1
Methods to Adjust for Confounding in Test-Negative Design COVID-19 Effectiveness Studies: Simulation Study.检测阴性设计的 COVID-19 有效性研究中调整混杂因素的方法:模拟研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 27;9:e58981. doi: 10.2196/58981.
2
Marginal Structural Models for Risk or Prevalence Ratios for a Point Exposure Using a Disease Risk Score.利用疾病风险评分模型估计点暴露下风险比或患病率的边缘结构模型
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 May 1;188(5):960-966. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz025.
3
Evaluation of propensity scores, disease risk scores, and regression in confounder adjustment for the safety of emerging treatment with group sequential monitoring.在序贯组监测中对新兴治疗安全性进行混杂因素调整时,倾向得分、疾病风险评分及回归的评估。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Apr;25(4):453-61. doi: 10.1002/pds.3983. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
4
On the joint use of propensity and prognostic scores in estimation of the average treatment effect on the treated: a simulation study.关于倾向得分和预后得分在估计对治疗对象的平均治疗效果中的联合应用:一项模拟研究。
Stat Med. 2014 Sep 10;33(20):3488-508. doi: 10.1002/sim.6030. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
5
The Mantel-Haenszel procedure revisited: models and generalizations.重温 Mantel-Haenszel 程序:模型和推广。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058327. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
6
Disease risk score as a confounder summary method: systematic review and recommendations.疾病风险评分作为混杂因素汇总方法:系统评价与建议。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Feb;22(2):122-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.3377. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
7
Role of disease risk scores in comparative effectiveness research with emerging therapies.疾病风险评分在新兴疗法的比较有效性研究中的作用。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 May;21 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):138-47. doi: 10.1002/pds.3231.
8
Control for confounding in case-control studies using the stratification score, a retrospective balancing score.病例对照研究中使用分层评分进行混杂控制,一种回顾性平衡评分。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Apr 1;173(7):752-60. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq406. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
9
Score-based adjustment for confounding by population stratification in genetic association studies.基因关联研究中基于分数对群体分层导致的混杂因素进行调整。
Genet Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;34(5):383-5. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20487.
10
Evaluating uses of data mining techniques in propensity score estimation: a simulation study.评估数据挖掘技术在倾向评分估计中的应用:一项模拟研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Jun;17(6):546-55. doi: 10.1002/pds.1555.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.疾病回顾性研究数据的统计分析方面
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959 Apr;22(4):719-48.
2
Stratification by a multivariate confounder score.通过多变量混杂因素评分进行分层。
Am J Epidemiol. 1976 Dec;104(6):609-20. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112339.
3
Are there two logistic regressions for retrospective studies?
Biometrics. 1978 Mar;34(1):100-5.
4
Multivariate analysis for matched case-control studies.匹配病例对照研究的多变量分析。
Am J Epidemiol. 1978 Mar;107(3):245-56. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112531.