Mancini Brandon R, Park Henry S, Harder Eileen M, Rutter Charles E, Corso Christopher D, Decker Roy H, Husain Zain A
Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Lung Cancer. 2016 Jul;97:22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
It is unclear whether elderly patients face an increased risk of complications following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as has been reported following surgical resection. This study evaluates toxicity and outcomes achieved with SBRT in elderly versus non-elderly patients.
We retrospectively identified patients treated with SBRT for cT1-3N0M0 NSCLC between 2007 and 2013. We defined elderly and non-elderly cohorts by age ≥75 and <75. We used chi-square and logistic regression analyses to compare toxicity, and employed Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses to assess overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and distant control (DC).
We identified 251 patients (126 elderly, 125 non-elderly) with a median follow-up of 3.0 years. No differences in acute or late grade ≥3 toxicity were observed. Acute grade ≥3 toxicity was 11.1% in elderly vs. 8.0% in non-elderly (p=0.66). Late grade ≥3 toxicity was 10.3% in elderly vs. 7.2% in non-elderly (p=0.50). There was one grade 5 toxicity (hemoptysis). There were no 3-year OS or LC differences between elderly and non-elderly patients (OS 47.5% vs. 41.0%, p=0.75; LC 84.2% vs. 86.4%, p=0.89). However, 3-year DC was superior in elderly patients (89.1% vs. 76.0%, p=0.01). Improved DC remained associated with elderly age in Cox regression (HR 0.42, p=0.01).
Elderly patients undergoing SBRT for early stage NSCLC appear to have similar risk of toxicity and rate of efficacy as in younger patients. These findings support the use of SBRT in appropriately selected elderly patients.
对于早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)后老年患者是否像手术切除后那样面临更高的并发症风险尚不清楚。本研究评估了老年与非老年患者接受SBRT后的毒性反应及治疗效果。
我们回顾性纳入了2007年至2013年间接受SBRT治疗的cT1-3N0M0 NSCLC患者。我们按年龄≥75岁和<75岁定义了老年组和非老年组。我们使用卡方检验和逻辑回归分析比较毒性反应,并采用Kaplan-Meier法、对数秩检验和多变量Cox比例风险分析评估总生存期(OS)、局部控制率(LC)和远处控制率(DC)。
我们纳入了251例患者(126例老年患者,125例非老年患者),中位随访时间为3.0年。未观察到急性或晚期≥3级毒性反应的差异。老年患者急性≥3级毒性反应发生率为11.1%,非老年患者为8.0%(p = 0.66)。老年患者晚期≥3级毒性反应发生率为10.3%,非老年患者为7.2%(p = 0.50)。有1例5级毒性反应(咯血)。老年和非老年患者的3年总生存期或局部控制率无差异(总生存期47.5%对41.0%,p = 0.75;局部控制率84.2%对86.4%,p = 0.89)。然而,老年患者的3年远处控制率更高(89.1%对76.0%,p = 0.01)。在Cox回归分析中,更高的远处控制率仍与老年患者相关(风险比0.42,p = 0.01)。
接受SBRT治疗的早期NSCLC老年患者似乎与年轻患者有相似的毒性风险和疗效。这些发现支持在适当选择的老年患者中使用SBRT。