Bentsen Kristian Kirkelund, Hansen Olfred, Ryg Jesper, Giger Ann-Kristine Weber, Jeppesen Stefan Starup
Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 5;13(13):3363. doi: 10.3390/cancers13133363.
The Geriatric 8 (G-8) is a known predictor of overall survival (OS) in older cancer patients, but is mainly based on nutritional aspects. This study aimed to assess if the G-8 combined with a hand-grip strength test (HGST) in patients with NSCLC treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy can predict long-term OS better than the G-8 alone. A total of 46 SBRT-treated patients with NSCLC of stage T1-T2N0M0 were included. Patients were divided into three groups: fit (normal G-8 and HGST), vulnerable (abnormal G-8 or HGST), or frail (abnormal G-8 and HGST). Statistically significant differences were found in 4-year OS between the fit, vulnerable, and frail groups (70% vs. 46% vs. 25%, = 0.04), as well as between the normal and abnormal G-8 groups (69% vs. 39%, = 0.02). In a multivariable analysis of OS, being vulnerable with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.03 or frail with an HR of 3.80 indicated poorer OS, but this did not reach statistical significance. This study suggests that there might be a benefit of adding a physical test to the G-8 for more precisely predicting overall survival in SBRT-treated patients with localized NSCLC. However, this should be confirmed in a larger study population.
老年8项指标(G-8)是老年癌症患者总生存期(OS)的已知预测指标,但主要基于营养方面。本研究旨在评估在接受立体定向体部放疗的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中,G-8联合握力测试(HGST)是否比单独使用G-8能更好地预测长期OS。共纳入46例接受SBRT治疗的T1-T2N0M0期NSCLC患者。患者被分为三组:健康组(G-8和HGST正常)、脆弱组(G-8或HGST异常)或虚弱组(G-8和HGST异常)。在健康组、脆弱组和虚弱组之间的4年总生存期存在统计学显著差异(70%对46%对25%,P = 0.04),正常G-8组和异常G-8组之间也存在差异(69%对39%,P = 0.02)。在总生存期的多变量分析中,脆弱组的风险比(HR)为2.03或虚弱组的HR为3.80表明总生存期较差,但未达到统计学显著性。本研究表明,在G-8基础上增加一项体能测试可能有助于更准确地预测接受SBRT治疗的局限性NSCLC患者的总生存期。然而,这一点应在更大的研究人群中得到证实。