Mathew Robin N, Katyal Aneesh, Shetty Ashutosh, Krishna Nayak U S
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Terna Dental College and Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, A. B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Indian J Dent Res. 2016 Mar-Apr;27(2):163-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.183120.
Biomechanical differences between lingual and labial orthodontics (LiO and LaO).
To investigate the effects of intrusive forces in lingual technique during retraction treatment mechanics.
Intrusive forces act differently in both techniques because of the different location of force vectors in relation to the center of resistance. Increasing the vertical intrusive force is one of the methods routinely used to prevent the uncontrolled tipping and obtain bodily tooth movement in LaO. However, its effects in lingual technique need to be investigated to derive at an optimal treatment mechanics.
Finite element method which has been successfully used to simulate tooth movement and optimize orthodontic mechanics effectively was used in this study. An accurate model of the upper central and lateral incisors with the surrounding structures was developed, and the "ANSYS" version 7.0 software was used for analysis.
Intrusive forces as high as 3.6N was required to obtain translation in LiO that too in an undesirable direction. Efforts to obtain torque control by increasing the intrusive force only would not be successful.
Forces that produce a translation in LaO tends to produce uncontrolled tipping in lingual technique. To obtain adequate torque control in lingual technique, a combination of the reduction in horizontal retraction forces, increased lingual root torque application, and increase in vertical intrusive forces is desirable.
舌侧正畸与唇侧正畸(LiO和LaO)的生物力学差异。
研究在舌侧技术的内收治疗力学过程中,侵入力的影响。
由于力向量相对于阻力中心的位置不同,侵入力在两种技术中的作用方式也不同。增加垂直侵入力是唇侧正畸中常规用于防止牙齿不受控制的倾斜并实现牙齿整体移动的方法之一。然而,其在舌侧技术中的效果需要进行研究,以得出最佳的治疗力学方法。
本研究采用已成功用于模拟牙齿移动并有效优化正畸力学的有限元方法。构建了包含周围结构的上颌中切牙和侧切牙的精确模型,并使用“ANSYS”7.0版软件进行分析。
在舌侧正畸中,需要高达3.6N的侵入力才能实现移动,而且移动方向不理想。仅通过增加侵入力来实现扭矩控制的努力不会成功。
在唇侧正畸中能产生平移的力,在舌侧技术中往往会导致牙齿不受控制的倾斜。为了在舌侧技术中获得足够的扭矩控制,需要结合减少水平内收力、增加舌侧牙根扭矩施加以及增加垂直侵入力。