Suppr超能文献

透析患者心房颤动抗凝治疗的使用、卒中、血栓栓塞、出血及死亡率的荟萃分析

Meta-Analysis of Anticoagulation Use, Stroke, Thromboembolism, Bleeding, and Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Dialysis.

作者信息

Wong Christopher X, Odutayo Ayodele, Emdin Connor A, Kinnear Ned J, Sun Michelle T

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Population Health, Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; School of Medicine, Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.

Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jun 15;117(12):1934-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.03.042. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients on dialysis. Although randomized trials of anticoagulation for AF have demonstrated striking reductions in stroke, these trials did not recruit patients on dialysis. We thus undertook this systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies including patients with AF on dialysis that reported associations of anticoagulation use. Twenty studies involving 529,741 subjects and 31,321 patients with AF on dialysis were identified. Anticoagulation was associated with a 45% (95% CI 13% to 88%) increased risk of any stroke, reflecting a nonsignificant 13% (95% CI -4% to 34%) increased ischemic stroke risk and 38% (95% CI 3% to 85%) increased hemorrhagic stroke risk. There was also a 44% (95% CI 38% to 56%) lower risk of any thromboembolism, and a 31% (95% CI 12% to 53%) increased risk of any bleeding but no clear association with cardiovascular death (relative risk 0.99, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.15) or all-cause mortality (relative risk 0.97, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.04). Incident event rates were similar or worse in patients on anticoagulation. In conclusion, these observational analyses provide little supporting evidence of benefit, and instead suggest harm, from anticoagulation in patients on dialysis with AF. These results raise the possibility that the effects of anticoagulation in patients with AF on dialysis may not be similar to the clear benefit of anticoagulation seen in patients with AF without end-stage renal disease. Randomized trials are required to definitively evaluate the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation for AF in the dialysis setting.

摘要

心房颤动(AF)在透析患者中很常见。尽管针对AF的抗凝随机试验已显示中风发生率显著降低,但这些试验并未纳入透析患者。因此,我们对包括透析AF患者的观察性研究进行了这项系统评价和荟萃分析,这些研究报告了抗凝药物使用的相关性。共纳入20项研究,涉及529,741名受试者和31,321名透析AF患者。抗凝与任何中风风险增加45%(95%CI 13%至88%)相关,这反映出缺血性中风风险增加13%(95%CI -4%至34%)无统计学意义,出血性中风风险增加38%(95%CI 3%至85%)。任何血栓栓塞风险也降低了44%(95%CI 38%至56%),任何出血风险增加了31%(95%CI 12%至53%),但与心血管死亡(相对风险0.99,95%CI 0.86至1.15)或全因死亡率(相对风险0.97,95%CI 0.90至1.04)无明显关联。接受抗凝治疗患者的事件发生率相似或更差。总之,这些观察性分析几乎没有提供支持抗凝有益的证据,反而提示透析AF患者抗凝存在危害。这些结果增加了一种可能性,即AF透析患者抗凝效果可能与无终末期肾病AF患者明显的抗凝益处不同。需要进行随机试验来明确评估透析环境中AF抗凝的安全性和有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验