• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与唐氏综合征提议者玩最后通牒游戏时要放轻松:对行为和中前额负性的影响。

Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.

机构信息

a Social and Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory and Developmental Disorders Program , Center for Health and Biological Sciences, Mackenzie Presbyterian University , São Paulo , Brazil.

出版信息

Soc Neurosci. 2017 Oct;12(5):530-540. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1195772. Epub 2016 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1080/17470919.2016.1195772
PMID:27237685
Abstract

The ultimatum game (UG) is an endowment sharing game in which a proposer suggests a division of an asset to a recipient, who must accept or reject it. Economic studies showed that despite recipients usually rejecting unfair offers, perception and reaction to unfairness are highly dependent on who is the proposer. Event-related potentials (ERPs) commonly detected in UG games are the medial frontal negativity (MFN), a component detected in recipients facing unfair offers, and the P300, a component related to attentional and memory processes. Given this, we aimed to investigate the behavioral and ERP responses of healthy people playing the UG game with Down syndrome (DS) and typical development (TD) proposers. Nineteen subjects participated in this study. The UG behavioral data were similar to previous studies. ERP analysis showed no MFN in participants facing unfair offers. A higher P300 amplitude was detected when participants faced fair offers from TD compared to DS fair offers. We also found a positive correlation between P300 amplitude for TD offers and self-esteem scale score. Together these findings indicate that insertion of an atypical player in the UG led to changes in participants' perception and expectancy of the game.

摘要

最后通牒游戏(UG)是一种资产分配游戏,其中提议者向接受者建议分配资产,接受者必须接受或拒绝。经济研究表明,尽管接受者通常会拒绝不公平的提议,但对不公平的感知和反应高度取决于谁是提议者。在 UG 游戏中通常检测到的事件相关电位(ERP)包括中额负波(MFN),这是接受不公平提议的接受者检测到的一个成分,以及 P300,这是与注意力和记忆过程相关的一个成分。有鉴于此,我们旨在研究与唐氏综合征(DS)和典型发育(TD)提议者一起玩 UG 游戏的健康人的行为和 ERP 反应。19 名受试者参加了这项研究。UG 的行为数据与先前的研究相似。ERP 分析显示,参与者面对不公平的提议时没有 MFN。参与者面对 TD 的公平提议时,P300 振幅更高,而面对 DS 的公平提议时则较低。我们还发现,TD 提议的 P300 振幅与自尊量表评分呈正相关。这些发现表明,在 UG 中插入一个非典型的参与者会导致参与者对游戏的感知和期望发生变化。

相似文献

1
Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.与唐氏综合征提议者玩最后通牒游戏时要放轻松:对行为和中前额负性的影响。
Soc Neurosci. 2017 Oct;12(5):530-540. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1195772. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
2
Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.内侧前额叶负波反映了最后通牒博弈中提议者对有利不平等的厌恶:一项ERP研究。
Brain Res. 2016 May 15;1639:38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.02.040. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
3
You are excusable! Neural correlates of economic neediness on empathic concern and fairness perception.情有可原!经济贫困在共情关注和公平感知上的神经关联。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2022 Feb;22(1):99-111. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00934-5. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
4
Adult-like neuroelectrical response to inequity in children: Evidence from the ultimatum game.儿童对不公平的成人式神经电反应:来自最后通牒博弈的证据。
Soc Neurosci. 2016;11(2):193-206. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2015.1057295. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
5
Behavioral and neuronal determinants of negative reciprocity in the ultimatum game.最后通牒博弈中负向互惠的行为和神经决定因素。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Oct;11(10):1608-17. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw069. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
6
Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to fairness norm violations in antisocial offenders.反社会罪犯对公平规范违反的行为和电生理反应。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019 Sep;269(6):731-740. doi: 10.1007/s00406-018-0878-2. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
7
The time course of neural responses to social versus non-social unfairness in the ultimatum game.社会与非社会不公平情境下最后通牒博弈中神经反应的时程变化。
Soc Neurosci. 2019 Aug;14(4):409-419. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2018.1486736. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
8
Age-related changes in social decision-making: An electrophysiological analysis of unfairness evaluation in the Ultimatum Game.社会决策中与年龄相关的变化:最后通牒博弈中不公平评价的电生理分析。
Neurosci Lett. 2019 Jan 23;692:122-126. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.10.061. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
9
The neural correlate of mid-value offers in ultimatum game.最后通牒博弈中中间值提议的神经关联。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 20;14(8):e0220622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220622. eCollection 2019.
10
Moral transgression modulates fairness considerations in the ultimatum game: Evidence from ERP and EEG data.道德违规在最后通牒博弈中调节公平考量:来自事件相关电位(ERP)和脑电图(EEG)数据的证据。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2023 Jun;188:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2023.03.001. Epub 2023 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Do Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Share Fairly and Reciprocally?自闭症谱系障碍儿童是否公平互惠?
J Autism Dev Disord. 2018 Aug;48(8):2714-2726. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3528-7.