Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Allergy Service, Basurto Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Br J Dermatol. 2016 Dec;175(6):1153-1165. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14768. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
There is a lack of large, randomized, double-blind studies that address antihistamine updosing for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). The objective of this systematic review is to explore and analyse available data to provide clinical evidence for the efficacy of antihistamine updosing. We searched the literature in Medline, Scopus, Google Scholar, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases using the keywords 'chronic, urticaria, antihistamines' to identify studies published between January 1990 and November 2014. We assessed quality using the Jadad score that evaluates quality of randomization, double-blinding and losses to follow-up. We identified 1042 articles and 15 articles were included in the final evaluation. We performed two meta-analyses, one that included studies that analysed treatment response among groups receiving different antihistamine dosages vs. placebo, and another that analysed antihistamine updosing in those patients who did not respond to standard dosages. Only five articles obtained a high quality level score. We did not find significant differences in response rates or number of weals in those patients who received a standard dosage vs. a high dosage. We found a significant improvement only in the pruritus variable of the Urticaria Activity Score scale. The estimated relative risk for improvement by increasing the antihistamine dosage was 2·27 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1·68-3·06]; however, there was significant heterogeneity. The proportion of nonrespondent patients with CSU who responded to antihistamine updosing was 63·2% (95% CI 57-69·6). We found that updosing antihistamines significantly improved control of pruritus but not weal number. However, the relative weakness of the studies and the significant heterogeneity among them made it difficult to reach a final conclusion.
目前缺乏大型、随机、双盲研究来探讨和评估慢性自发性荨麻疹(CSU)患者的抗组胺药物加量治疗。本系统评价的目的是探讨和分析现有数据,为抗组胺药物加量治疗的疗效提供临床证据。我们在 Medline、Scopus、Google Scholar、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 数据库中使用关键词“慢性、荨麻疹、抗组胺药”检索文献,以确定 1990 年 1 月至 2014 年 11 月期间发表的研究。我们使用 Jadad 评分评估随机分组、双盲和随访丢失的质量,评分范围为 0-5 分,得分越高表示质量越好。我们共检索到 1042 篇文章,最终纳入 15 篇文献进行评价。我们进行了两项 meta 分析,一项包括比较不同抗组胺药物剂量组与安慰剂组治疗反应的研究,另一项分析了未对标准剂量产生应答的患者加用抗组胺药物的疗效。只有 5 篇文章获得了高质量评分。我们发现,与标准剂量组相比,高剂量组患者的应答率或风团数量没有显著差异。我们仅发现瘙痒变量在荨麻疹活动评分量表上有显著改善。增加抗组胺药物剂量的估计相对风险为 2.27(95%置信区间 1.68-3.06);然而,异质性显著。CSU 患者对抗组胺药物加量治疗无应答,加量后应答的比例为 63.2%(95%置信区间 57-69.6)。我们发现,增加抗组胺药物剂量可显著改善瘙痒控制,但不能改善风团数量。然而,由于研究相对薄弱,且存在显著的异质性,使得我们难以得出最终结论。