Alska Ewa, Łaszczych Dariusz, Napiórkowska-Baran Katarzyna, Szymczak Bartłomiej, Rajewska Alicja, Rubisz Aleksandra Ewa, Romaniuk Paulina, Wrzesień Katarzyna, Mućka Natalia, Bartuzi Zbigniew
Department of Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Internal Diseases, Collegium Medicum Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University Torun, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Student Research Club of Clinical Immunology, Department of Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Internal Diseases, Collegium Medicum Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University Torun, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 8;14(4):1079. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041079.
Biologic therapies have revolutionized the treatment of severe allergic diseases, including asthma, atopic dermatitis (AD), chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs), and allergic rhinitis (AR). These molecularly targeted agents provide significant benefits for patients unresponsive to conventional treatments by addressing underlying immune mechanisms, particularly type 2 inflammation driven by cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13. Recent advancements include biologics targeting alarmins like thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) and IL-33, which may address both type 2 and non-type 2 inflammation, broadening their therapeutic scope. Despite their effectiveness, biologics remain expensive, posing socioeconomic challenges, and there are concerns regarding long-term safety and inter-individual variability in responses. Promising innovations such as bispecific antibodies and ultra-long-acting agents are under investigation, alongside digital health tools like remote biomarker monitoring and AI-driven decision support systems, which aim to enhance personalized care. However, disparities in access, particularly for underserved populations, underscore the need for policy reforms and affordable biosimilars. This review synthesizes recent findings and emerging trends, highlighting the evolving role of biologics in transforming allergic disease management and offering insights into future research directions.
生物疗法彻底改变了包括哮喘、特应性皮炎(AD)、慢性自发性荨麻疹(CSU)、伴有鼻息肉的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRSwNP)、嗜酸性粒细胞性胃肠道疾病(EGIDs)和过敏性鼻炎(AR)在内的严重过敏性疾病的治疗。这些分子靶向药物通过解决潜在的免疫机制,特别是由白细胞介素-4、白细胞介素-5和白细胞介素-13等细胞因子驱动的2型炎症,为对传统治疗无反应的患者带来显著益处。最近的进展包括靶向警报素如胸腺基质淋巴细胞生成素(TSLP)和白细胞介素-33的生物制剂,它们可能同时解决2型和非2型炎症,拓宽了治疗范围。尽管生物制剂有效,但它们仍然昂贵,带来了社会经济挑战,并且人们对长期安全性和个体反应差异存在担忧。双特异性抗体和超长效药物等有前景的创新正在研究中,同时还有远程生物标志物监测和人工智能驱动的决策支持系统等数字健康工具,旨在加强个性化医疗。然而,获取方面的差异,特别是对服务不足人群而言,凸显了政策改革和可负担生物类似药的必要性。本综述综合了近期研究结果和新趋势,强调了生物制剂在改变过敏性疾病管理中的不断演变的作用,并为未来研究方向提供见解。