Fransson Boel A, Chen Chi-Ya, Noyes Julie A, Ragle Claude A
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington.
Vet Surg. 2016 Nov;45(S1):O5-O13. doi: 10.1111/vsu.12483. Epub 2016 May 30.
To determine the construct and concurrent validity of instrument motion metrics for laparoscopic skills assessment in virtual reality and augmented reality simulators.
Evaluation study.
Veterinarian students (novice, n = 14) and veterinarians (experienced, n = 11) with no or variable laparoscopic experience.
Participants' minimally invasive surgery (MIS) experience was determined by hospital records of MIS procedures performed in the Teaching Hospital. Basic laparoscopic skills were assessed by 5 tasks using a physical box trainer. Each participant completed 2 tasks for assessments in each type of simulator (virtual reality: bowel handling and cutting; augmented reality: object positioning and a pericardial window model). Motion metrics such as instrument path length, angle or drift, and economy of motion of each simulator were recorded.
None of the motion metrics in a virtual reality simulator showed correlation with experience, or to the basic laparoscopic skills score. All metrics in augmented reality were significantly correlated with experience (time, instrument path, and economy of movement), except for the hand dominance metric. The basic laparoscopic skills score was correlated to all performance metrics in augmented reality. The augmented reality motion metrics differed between American College of Veterinary Surgeons diplomates and residents, whereas basic laparoscopic skills score and virtual reality metrics did not.
Our results provide construct validity and concurrent validity for motion analysis metrics for an augmented reality system, whereas a virtual reality system was validated only for the time score.
确定用于虚拟现实和增强现实模拟器中腹腔镜技能评估的器械运动指标的结构效度和同时效度。
评估研究。
无腹腔镜经验或腹腔镜经验各异的兽医专业学生(新手,n = 14)和兽医(有经验者,n = 11)。
通过教学医院进行的微创手术(MIS)程序的医院记录确定参与者的微创手术经验。使用实体箱式训练器通过5项任务评估基本腹腔镜技能。每位参与者在每种模拟器类型(虚拟现实:肠道操作和切割;增强现实:物体定位和心包窗模型)中完成2项任务进行评估。记录每个模拟器的器械路径长度、角度或漂移以及运动经济性等运动指标。
虚拟现实模拟器中的运动指标均与经验或基本腹腔镜技能得分无相关性。增强现实中的所有指标(时间、器械路径和运动经济性)均与经验显著相关,但手优势指标除外。基本腹腔镜技能得分与增强现实中的所有性能指标相关。美国兽医外科医生学院的专科医生和住院医生的增强现实运动指标不同,而基本腹腔镜技能得分和虚拟现实指标则无差异。
我们的结果为增强现实系统的运动分析指标提供了结构效度和同时效度,而虚拟现实系统仅在时间得分方面得到验证。