Vemulapalli Tracy H, Donkin Shawn S, Lescun Timothy B, O'Neil Peggy A, Zollner Patrick A
Departments of Comparative Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas;, Email:
Departments of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2017 Sep 1;56(5):500-508.
The targeted use of animals in teaching at institutions of higher learning is fundamental to educating the next generation of professionals in the biologic and animal sciences. As with animal research, universities and colleges that use animals in teaching are subject to regulatory oversight. Instructors must receive approval from their IACUC before using animals in their teaching. However, the questions asked on many institutions' animal care and use protocol (ACUP) are often geared more toward the use of animals for research. These questions may not be wholly appropriate in evaluating a teaching protocol; some questions are not applicable (for example, power analysis to justify animal numbers) whereas other important questions may be missing. This article discusses the issues surrounding the rationale for animal use in teaching; it also proposes a framework that instructors and IACUC members alike can use when writing and reviewing teaching ACUP. We hope this framework will help to ensure the most appropriate IACUC review of the ethical use of animals in higher education.
在高等院校的教学中针对性地使用动物,对于培养下一代生物和动物科学专业人才至关重要。与动物研究一样,在教学中使用动物的大学和学院也受到监管。教师在教学中使用动物之前,必须获得其机构动物护理与使用委员会(IACUC)的批准。然而,许多机构的动物护理与使用方案(ACUP)所提出的问题往往更侧重于动物在研究中的使用。这些问题在评估教学方案时可能并不完全合适;有些问题不适用(例如,用于证明动物数量合理性的功效分析),而其他一些重要问题可能缺失。本文讨论了围绕教学中使用动物的基本原理的相关问题;还提出了一个框架,教师和IACUC成员在撰写和审查教学ACUP时都可以使用。我们希望这个框架将有助于确保IACUC对高等教育中动物的道德使用进行最恰当的审查。