Suppr超能文献

家人与朋友:社交网络中哪些类型的人际关系相互关联?

Family and Friends: Which Types of Personal Relationships Go Together in a Network?

作者信息

Rözer Jesper, Mollenhorst Gerald, Poortman Anne-Rigt

机构信息

Department of Sociology/ICS, Utrecht University, Padualaan 14, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands ; Department of Sociology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Soc Indic Res. 2016;127:809-826. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-0987-5. Epub 2015 May 19.

Abstract

We examine the link between family and personal networks. Using arguments about meeting opportunities, competition and social influence, we hypothesise how the presence of specific types of family members (i.e., a partner, children, parents and siblings) and non-family members (i.e., friends, neighbours and colleagues) in the network mutually affect one another. In addition, we propose that-beyond their mere presence-the active role of family members in the network strongly affects the presence of non-family members in the network. Data from the third wave of the Survey on the Social Networks of the Dutch, collected in 2012 and 2013, show that active involvement is of key importance; more than merely having family members present in one's personal network, the active involvement of specific types of family members in the personal network is associated with having disproportionally more other family members and having somewhat fewer non-family members in the network.

摘要

我们研究家庭网络与个人网络之间的联系。基于关于见面机会、竞争和社会影响的论据,我们假设网络中特定类型的家庭成员(即伴侣、子女、父母和兄弟姐妹)以及非家庭成员(即朋友、邻居和同事)的存在如何相互影响。此外,我们提出,除了他们的单纯存在之外,家庭成员在网络中的积极作用强烈影响非家庭成员在网络中的存在。2012年和2013年收集的荷兰社会网络调查第三波数据表明,积极参与至关重要;与仅仅在个人网络中有家庭成员相比,特定类型的家庭成员在个人网络中的积极参与与网络中其他家庭成员数量不成比例地更多以及非家庭成员数量略少相关。

相似文献

1
Family and Friends: Which Types of Personal Relationships Go Together in a Network?
Soc Indic Res. 2016;127:809-826. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-0987-5. Epub 2015 May 19.
2
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
4
Presence of Drug-Free Family and Friends in the Personal Social Networks of People Receiving Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Nov;70:87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
5
The relationship between social networks and occupational and self-care functioning in people with psychosis.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2003 Apr;38(4):180-8. doi: 10.1007/s00127-003-0617-4.
6
You can't always get what you want: Network determinants of relationship inactualization in adolescence.
Soc Sci Res. 2017 Jan;61:181-194. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
8
Friendship Concept and Community Network Structure among Elementary School and University Students.
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 19;11(10):e0164886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164886. eCollection 2016.
9
Social networks of patients with psychosis: a systematic review.
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Oct 12;8:560. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1528-7.
10
Structural and functional characteristics of the social networks of people with mild intellectual disabilities.
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Apr;34(4):1280-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.01.012. Epub 2013 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Romantic relationship formation, maintenance and changes in personal networks.
Adv Life Course Res. 2015 Mar;23:86-97. doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2014.12.001. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
2
Persistence of social signatures in human communication.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jan 21;111(3):942-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308540110. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
3
Social network changes and life events across the life span: a meta-analysis.
Psychol Bull. 2013 Jan;139(1):53-80. doi: 10.1037/a0028601. Epub 2012 May 28.
4
Help to Family and Friends: Are There Gender Differences at Older Ages?
J Marriage Fam. 2011 Feb 1;73(1):77-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00790.x.
5
Between family and friends: a longitudinal study of friendship choice.
Br J Sociol. 2005 Sep;56(3):433-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00076.x.
6
Taking time seriously. A theory of socioemotional selectivity.
Am Psychol. 1999 Mar;54(3):165-81. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.54.3.165.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验