Suppr超能文献

通过更换植入物和保留髌下脂肪垫来改善全膝关节置换患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs):一项质量改进项目。

Improving patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in total knee replacement by changing implant and preserving the infrapatella fatpad: a quality improvement project.

作者信息

Partridge Thomas, Carluke Ian, Emmerson Kevin, Partington Paul, Reed Mike

机构信息

Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, United kingdom.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016 May 5;5(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u204088.w3767. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were introduced in 2009 to allow patient perspectives to potentially influence change and improvement. In collaboration with the national joint registry (NJR), PROMs data has been examined on a national basis to compare surgical factors in total knee replacement (TKR). Initial results demonstrated there were statistically significant differences in Oxford Knee Score (OKS) when using different brands of implant. Preservation of the infrapatella fatpad (IFP) has also been shown improve outcomes. This led Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust to make a mass move to the Zimmer Nexgen TKR and later change surgeons' routine practice to preserving the IFP. The PROMs were recorded pre and six months post operation to obtain improvement scores. The baseline improvement in OKS was 14.0. After changing implant to the Zimmer Nexgen in Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle 1 the average improvement score was 16.7. After implementing default preservation of the IFP in PDSA cycle 2 the average OKS improvement score was 17.3. The results from this project demonstrate a significant improvement in local services after implementing changes based on national and local evaluations. This initiative is an excellent example of improvement by evidence based practice and success of the English National Health Service PROMs scheme.

摘要

患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)于2009年引入,旨在使患者的观点有可能影响变革和改进。与国家关节注册中心(NJR)合作,已在全国范围内对PROMs数据进行了研究,以比较全膝关节置换术(TKR)中的手术因素。初步结果表明,使用不同品牌的植入物时,牛津膝关节评分(OKS)存在统计学上的显著差异。保留髌下脂肪垫(IFP)也已被证明可改善预后。这使得诺森比亚医疗保健国民保健服务基金会信托基金大规模转向使用捷迈邦美Nexgen全膝关节置换系统,随后改变外科医生的常规做法以保留IFP。在术前和术后六个月记录PROMs,以获得改善分数。OKS的基线改善值为14.0。在计划-实施-研究-改进(PDSA)循环1中更换为捷迈邦美Nexgen植入物后,平均改善分数为16.7。在PDSA循环2中实施IFP的默认保留后,OKS的平均改善分数为17.3。该项目的结果表明,在基于国家和地方评估实施变革后,当地服务有了显著改善。这项举措是循证实践带来改善以及英国国民保健服务PROMs计划取得成功的一个绝佳范例。

相似文献

2
The effect of surgical factors on early patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) following total knee replacement.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Aug;94(8):1058-66. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B8.28786.
3
Comparison of patient-reported outcome measures following total and unicondylar knee replacement.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jul;94(7):919-27. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B7.28436.
6
Translation and validation of the 12-item Oxford knee score for use in Finland.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Feb 8;18(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1405-8.
8
Comparison of patient-reported outcomes based on implant brand in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.
Bone Joint J. 2019 Jul;101-B(7_Supple_C):48-54. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B7.BJJ-2018-1382.R1.
9
Performance of EQ-5D, howRu and Oxford hip & knee scores in assessing the outcome of hip and knee replacements.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 22;16(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1759-x.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of patient-reported outcome measures to improve patient-related outcomes - a systematic review.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Nov 26;22(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02312-4.
2
Reliability of artificial intelligence in predicting total knee arthroplasty component sizes: a systematic review.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Feb;34(2):747-756. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03784-8. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
3
First steps in PROMs and PREMs collection in Wales as part of the prudent and value-based healthcare agenda.
Qual Life Res. 2021 Nov;30(11):3157-3170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02711-2. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
5
Functional results following high tibial osteotomy: a review of the literature.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 May;28(4):555-563. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2112-8. Epub 2018 Jan 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jan;68(1):73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
2
Removal of the infrapatella fat pad during total knee arthroplasty: does it affect patient outcomes?
Int Orthop. 2014 Dec;38(12):2483-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2427-6. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
3
Joint registry approach for identification of outlier prostheses.
Acta Orthop. 2013 Aug;84(4):348-52. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.831320.
4
The effect of surgical factors on early patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) following total knee replacement.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Aug;94(8):1058-66. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B8.28786.
5
Failure of total knee arthroplasty with or without patella resurfacing.
Acta Orthop. 2011 Jun;82(3):282-92. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.570672.
6
The infrapatellar fat pad should be considered as an active osteoarthritic joint tissue: a narrative review.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 Jul;18(7):876-82. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.03.014. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
9
The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Aug;89(8):1010-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.19424.
10
Biomechanical and kinematic influences of a total infrapatellar fat pad resection on the knee.
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Dec;32(8):1873-80. doi: 10.1177/0363546504263946.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验