Suppr超能文献

威尔士在审慎和基于价值的医疗保健议程中,开始收集患者报告的结局指标(PROMs)和预先指定的结局指标(PREMs)。

First steps in PROMs and PREMs collection in Wales as part of the prudent and value-based healthcare agenda.

机构信息

Cedar Healthcare Technology Research Centre, Cedar, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff Medicentre, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4UJ, UK.

Value Based & Prudent Healthcare, Mamhilad House, Mamhilad Park Estate, Pontypool, NP4 0HZ, UK.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2021 Nov;30(11):3157-3170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02711-2. Epub 2020 Nov 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Patients are experts in their own health and should be treated as equal partners in their care. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are an effective way of gathering patient feedback and can facilitate effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis to improve decision making and service improvement. The PROMs, PREMs & Effectiveness Programme was initiated in 2016 and aimed to develop an electronic platform to facilitate collection of PROMs and Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) from secondary care patients across Wales.

METHODS

We worked with all Health Boards in Wales, the NHS Wales Informatics Service (NWIS), and Cedar (a healthcare technology research centre) to identify and meet technical requirements to develop a platform which is fit for purpose. Patient groups were included throughout the development to gather feedback and for extensive testing. Clinical teams helped identify the most appropriate tools, with licences, translations and electronic formatting issues being managed centrally.

RESULTS

The developed platform is integrated with patient administration systems minimising the need for manual input, with processes in place to allow automatic collection triggers according to nationally agreed schedules. We have over 30 nationally agreed PROMs 'pathways' with over 110,000 PROMs collected to date. Responses are fed back to clinicians via the electronic patient record and to each health board via feeds to the national data warehouse, making data easily accessible to different teams, maximising use and application.

DISCUSSION

The national platform has provided a co-ordinated approach to PROMs collection in Wales, offering an effective means of communicating with patients outside the traditional clinic visit.

摘要

目的

患者是自身健康的专家,应将其视为护理的平等伙伴。患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)是收集患者反馈的有效方法,可以促进有效性和成本效益分析,以改善决策和服务改进。患者报告结果测量(PROMs)、患者报告体验测量(PREMs)和效果计划于 2016 年启动,旨在开发一个电子平台,以方便在威尔士的二级保健患者中收集 PROMs 和 PREMs。

方法

我们与威尔士的所有卫生委员会、NHS 威尔士信息服务(NWIS)和 Cedar(一家医疗保健技术研究中心)合作,确定并满足技术要求,以开发一个适合目的的平台。患者群体在整个开发过程中都被包括在内,以收集反馈意见并进行广泛测试。临床团队帮助确定最合适的工具,许可证、翻译和电子格式问题由中央管理。

结果

开发的平台与患者管理系统集成,最大限度地减少了手动输入的需要,并且有流程根据国家商定的时间表自动触发收集。我们已经有 30 多个国家商定的 PROMs“途径”,迄今为止已经收集了超过 110,000 个 PROMs。响应通过电子患者记录反馈给临床医生,并通过向国家数据仓库的反馈反馈给每个卫生委员会,使不同团队能够轻松访问数据,最大限度地利用和应用数据。

讨论

国家平台为威尔士的 PROMs 收集提供了协调一致的方法,为在传统就诊之外与患者进行有效沟通提供了一种手段。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca28/8528781/7dc1b7ad0168/11136_2020_2711_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
First steps in PROMs and PREMs collection in Wales as part of the prudent and value-based healthcare agenda.
Qual Life Res. 2021 Nov;30(11):3157-3170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02711-2. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
10
Factors affecting implementation of patient-reported outcome and experience measures in a pediatric health system.
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Mar 9;7(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00563-1.

引用本文的文献

2
A narrative review of the use of PROMs and machine learning to impact value-based clinical decision-making.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03083-8.
3
Patient-Reported Experiences in Vascular Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis of Care Quality.
Health Serv Insights. 2025 Jun 4;18:11786329251342283. doi: 10.1177/11786329251342283. eCollection 2025.
4
Primary care occupational therapist's methods of outcome evaluation: Do they align to value-based healthcare?
Br J Occup Ther. 2025 Jun;88(6):362-378. doi: 10.1177/03080226251320185. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
5
A new validated Lymphoedema-specific Patient Reported Outcome Measure (LYMPROM) for adults with Lymphoedema.
PLoS One. 2025 May 23;20(5):e0315314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315314. eCollection 2025.
7
A social return on investment analysis of patient-reported outcome measures in value-based healthcare.
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Feb 20;9(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00853-w.
8
Using patient-generated health data more efficient and effectively to facilitate the implementation of value-based healthcare in the EU - Innovation report.
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024 Oct 18;24:672-678. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.10.026. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
PROMs data: can it be used to make decisions for individual patients? A narrative review.
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019 Jul 29;10:233-241. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S156291. eCollection 2019.
5
Exploring Privilege in the Digital Divide: Implications for Theory, Policy, and Practice.
Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):e1-e15. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny037.
6
3L, 5L, What the L? A NICE Conundrum.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Jun;36(6):637-640. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0622-9.
9
Deriving optimal value from each system.
J R Soc Med. 2017 Jul;110(7):283-286. doi: 10.1177/0141076817711090. Epub 2017 May 24.
10
Measuring what matters to patients.
BMJ. 2017 Feb 20;356:j816. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j816.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验