Johnson Michael J, Mueller Martina, Eliason Michele J, Stuart Gail, Nemeth Lynne S
School of Nursing, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Dec;25(23-24):3628-3642. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13414. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
The purposes of this study were to measure the prevalence of, and identify factors associated with, cervical cancer screening among a sample of lesbian, bisexual and queer women, and transgender men.
Past research has found that lesbian, bisexual and queer women underuse cervical screening service. Because deficient screening remains the most significant risk factor for cervical cancer, it is essential to understand the differences between routine and nonroutine screeners.
A convergent-parallel mixed methods design.
A convenience sample of 21- to 65-year-old lesbian and bisexual women and transgender men were recruited in the USA from August-December 2014. Quantitative data were collected via a 48-item Internet questionnaire (N = 226), and qualitative data were collected through in-depth telephone interviews (N = 20) and open-ended questions on the Internet questionnaire.
Seventy-three per cent of the sample was routine cervical screeners. The results showed that a constellation of factors influence the use of cervical cancer screening among lesbian, bisexual and queer women. Some of those factors overlap with the general female population, whereas others are specific to the lesbian, bisexual or queer identity. Routine screeners reported feeling more welcome in the health care setting, while nonroutine screeners reported more discrimination related to their sexual orientation and gender expression. Routine screeners were also more likely to 'out' to their provider. The quantitative and qualitative factors were also compared and contrasted.
Many of the factors identified in this study to influence cervical cancer screening relate to the health care environment and to interactions between the patient and provider.
Nurses should be involved with creating welcoming environments for lesbian, bisexual and queer women and their partners. Moreover, nurses play a large role in patient education and should promote self-care behaviours among lesbian women and transgender men.
本研究旨在测量女同性恋、双性恋和酷儿女性以及跨性别男性样本中宫颈癌筛查的患病率,并确定与之相关的因素。
过去的研究发现,女同性恋、双性恋和酷儿女性未充分利用宫颈癌筛查服务。由于筛查不足仍然是宫颈癌最主要的危险因素,因此了解常规筛查者和非常规筛查者之间的差异至关重要。
采用收敛平行混合方法设计。
2014年8月至12月在美国招募了21至65岁的女同性恋、双性恋女性和跨性别男性作为便利样本。通过一份包含48个项目的网络问卷收集定量数据(N = 226),并通过深度电话访谈(N = 20)和网络问卷上的开放式问题收集定性数据。
样本中有73%的人是常规宫颈癌筛查者。结果表明,一系列因素影响女同性恋、双性恋和酷儿女性对宫颈癌筛查的使用。其中一些因素与一般女性人群重叠,而其他因素则特定于女同性恋、双性恋或酷儿身份。常规筛查者表示在医疗环境中感觉更受欢迎,而非常规筛查者则报告了更多与性取向和性别表达相关的歧视。常规筛查者也更有可能向其医疗服务提供者公开自己的性取向。还对定量和定性因素进行了比较和对比。
本研究中确定的许多影响宫颈癌筛查的因素与医疗环境以及患者与医疗服务提供者之间的互动有关。
护士应参与为女同性恋、双性恋和酷儿女性及其伴侣创造友好的环境。此外,护士在患者教育中发挥着重要作用,应促进女同性恋女性和跨性别男性的自我保健行为。