• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙科树脂复合材料的聚合收缩动力学和收缩应力。

Polymerization shrinkage kinetics and shrinkage-stress in dental resin-composites.

机构信息

Biomaterials Science Research Group, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, United Kingdom; College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Biomaterials Science Research Group, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Dent Mater. 2016 Aug;32(8):998-1006. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 May 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2016.05.006
PMID:27240744
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate a set of resin-composites and the effect of their composition on polymerization shrinkage strain and strain kinetics, shrinkage stress and the apparent elastic modulus.

METHODS

Eighteen commercially available resin-composites were investigated. Three specimens (n=3) were made per material and light-cured with an LED unit (1200mW/cm(2)) for 20s. The bonded-disk method was used to measure the shrinkage strain and Bioman shrinkage stress instrument was used to measure shrinkage stress. The shrinkage strain kinetics at 23°C was monitored for 60min. Maximum strain and stress was evaluated at 60min. The shrinkage strain rate was calculated using numerical differentiation.

RESULTS

The shrinkage strain values ranged from 1.83 (0.09) % for Tetric Evoceram (TEC) to 4.68 (0.04) % for Beautifil flow plus (BFP). The shrinkage strain rate ranged from 0.11 (0.01%s(-1)) for Gaenial posterior (GA-P) to 0.59 (0.07) %s(-1) for BFP. Shrinkage stress values ranged from 3.94 (0.40)MPa for TET to 10.45 (0.41)MPa for BFP. The apparent elastic modulus ranged from 153.56 (18.7)MPa for Ever X posterior (EVX) to 277.34 (25.5) MPa for Grandio SO heavy flow (GSO).

SIGNIFICANCE

The nature of the monomer system determines the amount of the bulk contraction that occurs during polymerization and the resultant stress. Higher values of shrinkage strain and stress were demonstrated by the investigated flowable materials. The bulk-fill materials showed comparable result when compared to the traditional resin-composites.

摘要

目的

研究一组树脂复合材料及其组成对聚合收缩应变和应变动力学、收缩应力和表观弹性模量的影响。

方法

研究了 18 种市售的树脂复合材料。每种材料制作 3 个试件(n=3),并用 LED 装置(1200mW/cm²)光固化 20s。采用粘结盘法测量收缩应变,用 Bioman 收缩应力仪测量收缩应力。在 23°C 下监测收缩应变动力学 60min。在 60min 时评估最大应变和应力。使用数值微分法计算收缩应变率。

结果

收缩应变值范围从 Tetric Evoceram(TEC)的 1.83(0.09)%到 Beautifil flow plus(BFP)的 4.68(0.04)%。收缩应变率范围从 Gaenial posterior(GA-P)的 0.11(0.01%s-1)到 BFP 的 0.59(0.07)%s-1。收缩应力值范围从 TET 的 3.94(0.40)MPa 到 BFP 的 10.45(0.41)MPa。表观弹性模量范围从 Ever X posterior(EVX)的 153.56(18.7)MPa 到 Grandio SO heavy flow(GSO)的 277.34(25.5)MPa。

意义

单体系统的性质决定了聚合过程中发生的总体收缩量和产生的应力。所研究的流动性材料表现出更高的收缩应变和应力值。与传统的树脂复合材料相比,块状填充材料表现出相当的结果。

相似文献

1
Polymerization shrinkage kinetics and shrinkage-stress in dental resin-composites.牙科树脂复合材料的聚合收缩动力学和收缩应力。
Dent Mater. 2016 Aug;32(8):998-1006. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 May 28.
2
Determination of polymerization shrinkage of different composites using a photoelastic method.使用光弹性方法测定不同复合材料的聚合收缩率。
Am J Dent. 2017 Feb;30(1):16-22.
3
Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology.基于 SDR™ 技术的甲基丙烯酸酯基可流动复合树脂的研究。
Dent Mater. 2011 Apr;27(4):348-55. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.014. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
4
Shrinkage stress and elastic modulus assessment of bulk-fill composites.块状充填复合材料的收缩应力和弹性模量评估。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2019 Jan 7;27:e20180132. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0132.
5
Polymerization Behavior and Mechanical Properties of High-Viscosity Bulk Fill and Low Shrinkage Resin Composites.高粘度块状填充和低收缩树脂复合材料的聚合行为和力学性能。
Oper Dent. 2017 Nov/Dec;42(6):E177-E187. doi: 10.2341/16-385-L. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
6
Polymerization shrinkage, modulus, and shrinkage stress related to tooth-restoration interfacial debonding in bulk-fill composites.与大块充填复合材料中牙齿修复界面脱粘相关的聚合收缩、模量和收缩应力。
J Dent. 2015 Apr;43(4):430-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
7
Polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage force kinetics of high- and low-viscosity dimethacrylate- and ormocer-based bulk-fill resin composites.高、低粘度双甲基丙烯酸酯和有机硅烷基块状填充树脂复合材料的聚合收缩和收缩力动力学。
Odontology. 2019 Jan;107(1):103-110. doi: 10.1007/s10266-018-0369-y. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
8
Polymerization shrinkage stress kinetics and related properties of bulk-fill resin composites.大块充填树脂复合材料的聚合收缩应力动力学及相关性能
Oper Dent. 2014 Jul-Aug;39(4):374-82. doi: 10.2341/13-017-L. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
9
Polymerization shrinkage kinetics of dimethacrylate resin-cements.二甲基丙烯酸酯树脂水门汀的聚合收缩动力学
Dent Mater. 2009 Aug;25(8):1058-66. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.04.008. Epub 2009 May 28.
10
Pre-heating of high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites: effects on shrinkage force and monomer conversion.高粘度大块充填树脂复合材料的预热:对收缩力和单体转化率的影响。
J Dent. 2015 Nov;43(11):1358-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.014. Epub 2015 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Internal and Marginal Shrinkage Stress in Adhesive Class III Cavities Restored with Different Resin Composite Combinations-A 3D-FEA Study.不同树脂复合材料组合修复Ⅲ类洞时内部及边缘收缩应力的评估——一项三维有限元分析研究
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Aug 14;13(8):367. doi: 10.3390/dj13080367.
2
Stress Distribution Pattern in Class I Cavities Restored by Different Techniques According to the Stress Reducing Direct Composite Concept: A Finite Element Analysis.根据应力降低直接复合树脂概念,采用不同技术修复的I类洞型的应力分布模式:有限元分析
Int J Dent. 2025 Jun 4;2025:7196931. doi: 10.1155/ijod/7196931. eCollection 2025.
3
Push-out Bond Strength of Bulk-Fill Composites Used as Intracanal Anchorage Material.
用作根管内固位材料的大块充填复合树脂的推出粘结强度。
J Adhes Dent. 2025 Apr 30;27:81-91. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.c_1991.
4
The Evaluation of Restored Proximal Contact Areas with Four Direct Adherent Biomaterials: An In Vitro Study.四种直接黏附生物材料修复近端接触区的评估:一项体外研究
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Apr 3;16(4):128. doi: 10.3390/jfb16040128.
5
Comparison of fracture resistance between immediate and delayed composite restorations with or without fiber after root canal treatment: a field-emission-gun scanning electron microscope study.根管治疗后即刻与延迟复合树脂修复体有无纤维时的抗折性比较:场发射枪扫描电子显微镜研究
PeerJ. 2025 Feb 25;13:e19018. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19018. eCollection 2025.
6
Comparing Polymerization Shrinkage Measurement Methods for Universal Shade Flowable Resin-Based Composites.通用色度可流动树脂基复合材料聚合收缩测量方法的比较
Biomimetics (Basel). 2024 Dec 11;9(12):753. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9120753.
7
Does different application modes of universal adhesives with universal resin composites affect the microleakage in class V cavities? An in vitro study.不同的通用型黏合剂和通用型树脂复合材料的应用模式是否会影响 V 类洞的微渗漏?一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 13;24(1):1367. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05138-0.
8
Fracture Resistance in Fibre-Reinforced Resin Composite Restorations in Deciduous and Permanent Molars: An Ex Vivo Study.乳牙和恒牙磨牙纤维增强树脂复合材料修复体的抗折性:一项体外研究
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Sep;36(9):1197-1202. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.06.017. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
9
Surface alterations and compound release from aligner attachments in vitro.体外隐形矫治器附件的表面变化和药物释放。
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Aug 1;46(4). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae026.
10
Influence of Cavity Lining on the 3-Year Clinical Outcome of Posterior Composite Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.窝洞衬层对后牙复合树脂修复体3年临床疗效的影响:一项随机对照临床试验
Dent J (Basel). 2024 May 7;12(5):128. doi: 10.3390/dj12050128.