Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cristo Re Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;225(2):171.e1-171.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.035. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
To date, no research has focused on the sonographic quantification of the degree of flexion of the fetal head in relation to the labor outcome in women with protracted active phase of labor.
This study aimed to assess the relationship between the transabdominal sonographic indices of fetal head flexion and the mode of delivery in women with protracted active phase of labor.
Prospective evaluation of women with protracted active phase of labor recruited across 3 tertiary maternity units. Eligible cases were submitted to transabdominal ultrasound for the evaluation of the fetal head position and flexion, which was measured by means of the occiput-spine angle in fetuses in nonocciput posterior position and by means of the chin-to-chest angle in fetuses in occiput posterior position. The occiput-spine angle and the chin-to-chest angle were compared between women who had vaginal delivery and those who had cesarean delivery. Cases where obstetrical intervention was performed solely based on suspected fetal distress were excluded.
A total of 129 women were included, of whom 43 (33.3%) had occiput posterior position. Spontaneous vaginal delivery, instrumental delivery, and cesarean delivery were recorded in 66 (51.2%), 17 (13.1%), and 46 (35.7%) cases, respectively. A wider occiput-spine angle was measured in women who had vaginal delivery compared with those submitted to cesarean delivery owing to labor dystocia (126±14 vs 115±24; P<.01). At the receiver operating characteristic curve, the area under the curve was 0.675 (95% confidence interval, 0.538-0.812; P<.01), and the optimal occiput-spine angle cutoff value discriminating between cases of vaginal delivery and those delivered by cesarean delivery was 109°. A narrower chin-to-chest angle was measured in cases who had vaginal delivery compared with those undergoing cesarean delivery (27±33 vs 56±28 degrees; P<.01). The area under the curve of the chin-to-chest angle in relation to the mode of delivery was 0.758 (95% confidence interval, 0.612-0.904; P<.01), and the optimal cutoff value discriminating between vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery was 33.0°.
In women with protracted active phase of labor, the sonographic demonstration of fetal head deflexion in occiput posterior and in nonocciput posterior fetuses is associated with an increased incidence of cesarean delivery owing to labor dystocia. Such findings suggest that intrapartum ultrasound may contribute in the categorization of the etiology of labor dystocia.
迄今为止,尚无研究关注在活跃期延长的产妇中,胎儿头部屈曲程度与分娩结局的关系。
本研究旨在评估活跃期延长的产妇经腹超声评估胎儿头部屈曲的各项指标与分娩方式的关系。
在 3 家三级产科医院前瞻性评估活跃期延长的产妇。对符合条件的病例进行经腹超声检查,评估胎儿头部位置和屈曲程度,采用顶-脊柱角评估非顶后位胎儿的头部屈曲程度,采用颏胸角评估顶后位胎儿的头部屈曲程度。比较阴道分娩与剖宫产的产妇的顶-脊柱角和颏胸角。排除仅因疑似胎儿窘迫而进行产科干预的病例。
共纳入 129 例产妇,其中 43 例(33.3%)为顶后位。记录到自然阴道分娩、器械助产和剖宫产分别为 66 例(51.2%)、17 例(13.1%)和 46 例(35.7%)。由于产程困难,行阴道分娩的产妇的顶-脊柱角大于行剖宫产的产妇(126±14° vs 115±24°;P<.01)。在受试者工作特征曲线下,曲线下面积为 0.675(95%置信区间,0.538-0.812;P<.01),最佳顶-脊柱角截断值可区分阴道分娩和剖宫产病例,为 109°。行阴道分娩的产妇的颏胸角小于行剖宫产的产妇(27±33° vs 56±28°;P<.01)。与分娩方式相关的颏胸角曲线下面积为 0.758(95%置信区间,0.612-0.904;P<.01),最佳截断值可区分阴道分娩和剖宫产,为 33.0°。
在活跃期延长的产妇中,经腹超声显示胎儿头部在后枕位和非后枕位的屈曲与因产程困难行剖宫产的发生率增加有关。这些发现表明,产时超声检查可能有助于对产程困难的病因进行分类。