• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种衡量恶意创造力的新工具:恶意创造力行为量表。

A New Tool to Measure Malevolent Creativity: The Malevolent Creativity Behavior Scale.

作者信息

Hao Ning, Tang Mengying, Yang Jing, Wang Qifei, Runco Mark A

机构信息

School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University Shanghai, China.

American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology, San Diego CA, USA.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 May 18;7:682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00682. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00682
PMID:27242596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4870273/
Abstract

The present study developed the malevolent creativity behavior scale (MCBS), which contains 13 items and was designed to measure individuals' malevolent creativity through the behavior of daily lives. A total of 958 participants from different regions of China completed the MCBS in an online fashion. Cronbach's α coefficient, using the 908 MCBSs with entirely complete data, indicated that the MCBS had satisfactory reliability. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed that the MCBS had 3 dimensions: hurting people, lying, and playing tricks. MCBS scores were positively correlated with individuals' aggression, openness, extraversion, and scores on the Runco Ideational Behavior Scale (RIBS). MCBS scores also predicted individuals' malevolent creativity performances when solving realistic, open-ended problems. The MCBS has a simple response medium and scoring procedure. This, along with the adequate psychometric properties uncovered here, indicates that it is a useful tool for research on malevolent creativity. Given that the MCBS contains a relatively small number of categories and items, further research could expand the categories of items and develop and test more items. Moreover, it would be useful to test MCBS's reliability and validity with other criteria. Perhaps future research could obtain actual MC data from criminal or other unambiguously malevolent samples.

摘要

本研究编制了恶意创造力行为量表(MCBS),该量表包含13个项目,旨在通过日常生活行为来测量个体的恶意创造力。共有958名来自中国不同地区的参与者以在线方式完成了MCBS。使用908份数据完全完整的MCBS计算得出的克朗巴哈α系数表明,MCBS具有令人满意的信度。探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)表明,MCBS有三个维度:伤人、说谎和耍手段。MCBS得分与个体的攻击性、开放性、外向性以及Runco创意行为量表(RIBS)得分呈正相关。MCBS得分还能预测个体在解决现实的、开放式问题时的恶意创造力表现。MCBS具有简单的作答方式和计分程序。结合本研究发现的良好心理测量学特性,这表明它是研究恶意创造力的一个有用工具。鉴于MCBS包含的类别和项目数量相对较少,未来的研究可以扩大项目类别,并开发和测试更多项目。此外,用其他标准来检验MCBS的信度和效度会很有帮助。也许未来的研究可以从罪犯或其他明确的恶意样本中获取实际的MC数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a750/4870273/4087fea97e19/fpsyg-07-00682-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a750/4870273/4087fea97e19/fpsyg-07-00682-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a750/4870273/4087fea97e19/fpsyg-07-00682-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A New Tool to Measure Malevolent Creativity: The Malevolent Creativity Behavior Scale.一种衡量恶意创造力的新工具:恶意创造力行为量表。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 18;7:682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00682. eCollection 2016.
2
Psychometric examination of Runco Ideational Behavior Scale: Thai adaptation.Runco创意行为量表的心理测量学检验:泰国版改编
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2021 Jan 11;34(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41155-020-00170-9.
3
Creative, Antagonistic, and Angry? Exploring the Roots of Malevolent Creativity with a Real-World Idea Generation Task.有创造力、具对抗性且愤怒?通过一项现实世界的创意生成任务探索恶意创造力的根源。
J Creat Behav. 2021 Sep;55(3):710-722. doi: 10.1002/jocb.484. Epub 2020 Dec 12.
4
Similarities and Distinctions between Cortical Neural Substrates That Underlie Generation of Malevolent Creative Ideas.产生恶意创意的皮质神经基质的相似性和区别。
eNeuro. 2023 Sep 19;10(9). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0127-23.2023. Print 2023 Sep.
5
Childhood Trauma and Malevolent Creativity in Chinese College Students: Moderated Mediation by Psychological Resilience and Aggression.中国大学生童年创伤与恶意创造力:心理韧性和攻击性的调节中介作用
J Intell. 2022 Nov 7;10(4):97. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10040097.
6
Enjoying others' distress and indifferent to threat? Changes in prefrontal-posterior coupling during social-emotional processing are linked to malevolent creativity.享受他人的痛苦和对威胁漠不关心?社会情感处理过程中前额叶-后叶耦合的变化与恶意创造力有关。
Brain Cogn. 2022 Nov;163:105913. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2022.105913. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
7
The Effect of Parenting Practices on Creativity: Mediating Role of Psychological Resilience.养育方式对创造力的影响:心理韧性的中介作用。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Nov 2;16:4501-4514. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S436370. eCollection 2023.
8
The effect of justice sensitivity on malevolent creativity: the mediating role of anger and the moderating role of emotion regulation strategies.公正敏感性对恶意创造力的影响:愤怒的中介作用和情绪调节策略的调节作用。
BMC Psychol. 2024 May 13;12(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01759-w.
9
The impact of parenting style on malevolent creativity based on Chinese university students: a latent profile analysis.基于中国大学生的养育方式对恶意创造力的影响:一项潜在剖面分析
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 26;15:1363778. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1363778. eCollection 2024.
10
The Relationship Between Childhood Neglect and Malevolent Creativity: The Mediating Effect of the Dark Triad Personality.童年期忽视与恶意创造力之间的关系:黑暗三性格特质的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 16;11:613695. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613695. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Field dependent-independent cognitive style as a predictor of malevolent creativity: a multifaceted approach.场依存-场独立认知风格作为恶意创造力的预测指标:一种多维度方法。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 2;16:1502823. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1502823. eCollection 2025.
2
The Social Context of Malevolent Creativity.恶意创造力的社会背景。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 5;15(5):630. doi: 10.3390/bs15050630.
3
Smartphone addiction and malevolent creativity-the mediating role of psychological capital and the moderating role of self-concept clarity.

本文引用的文献

1
The bias against creativity: why people desire but reject creative ideas.对创造力的偏见:为什么人们渴望但却拒绝创意。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Jan 1;23(1):13-7. doi: 10.1177/0956797611421018. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
2
Human aggression.人类攻击性。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:27-51. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231.
3
Everyday lies in close and casual relationships.日常存在于亲密且随意的关系之中。
智能手机成瘾与恶意创造力——心理资本的中介作用和自我概念清晰度的调节作用
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 28;16:1574738. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1574738. eCollection 2025.
4
Managing malice in negative environments: the mediating effect of coping styles on the relationship between negative sense of place and malevolent creativity among Chinese high school students.应对负面环境中的恶意:应对方式对中国高中生负面场所感与恶意创造力之间关系的中介作用
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jan 14;13(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02333-0.
5
The impact of parenting style on malevolent creativity based on Chinese university students: a latent profile analysis.基于中国大学生的养育方式对恶意创造力的影响:一项潜在剖面分析
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 26;15:1363778. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1363778. eCollection 2024.
6
The effect of justice sensitivity on malevolent creativity: the mediating role of anger and the moderating role of emotion regulation strategies.公正敏感性对恶意创造力的影响:愤怒的中介作用和情绪调节策略的调节作用。
BMC Psychol. 2024 May 13;12(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01759-w.
7
The Influence of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Malevolent Creativity in Young Adulthood.童年不良经历对青年期恶意创造力的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Nov 22;13(12):961. doi: 10.3390/bs13120961.
8
The Effect of Parenting Practices on Creativity: Mediating Role of Psychological Resilience.养育方式对创造力的影响:心理韧性的中介作用。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Nov 2;16:4501-4514. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S436370. eCollection 2023.
9
Similarities and Distinctions between Cortical Neural Substrates That Underlie Generation of Malevolent Creative Ideas.产生恶意创意的皮质神经基质的相似性和区别。
eNeuro. 2023 Sep 19;10(9). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0127-23.2023. Print 2023 Sep.
10
Childhood Maltreatment and Creativity among Chinese College Students: A Serial Mediation Model.中国大学生童年期受虐经历与创造力:一个系列中介模型
J Intell. 2023 Mar 24;11(4):58. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11040058.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jan;74(1):63-79. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.1.63.
4
The aggression questionnaire.攻击性问卷。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 Sep;63(3):452-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.63.3.452.