Suppr超能文献

一种衡量恶意创造力的新工具:恶意创造力行为量表。

A New Tool to Measure Malevolent Creativity: The Malevolent Creativity Behavior Scale.

作者信息

Hao Ning, Tang Mengying, Yang Jing, Wang Qifei, Runco Mark A

机构信息

School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University Shanghai, China.

American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology, San Diego CA, USA.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 May 18;7:682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00682. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

The present study developed the malevolent creativity behavior scale (MCBS), which contains 13 items and was designed to measure individuals' malevolent creativity through the behavior of daily lives. A total of 958 participants from different regions of China completed the MCBS in an online fashion. Cronbach's α coefficient, using the 908 MCBSs with entirely complete data, indicated that the MCBS had satisfactory reliability. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed that the MCBS had 3 dimensions: hurting people, lying, and playing tricks. MCBS scores were positively correlated with individuals' aggression, openness, extraversion, and scores on the Runco Ideational Behavior Scale (RIBS). MCBS scores also predicted individuals' malevolent creativity performances when solving realistic, open-ended problems. The MCBS has a simple response medium and scoring procedure. This, along with the adequate psychometric properties uncovered here, indicates that it is a useful tool for research on malevolent creativity. Given that the MCBS contains a relatively small number of categories and items, further research could expand the categories of items and develop and test more items. Moreover, it would be useful to test MCBS's reliability and validity with other criteria. Perhaps future research could obtain actual MC data from criminal or other unambiguously malevolent samples.

摘要

本研究编制了恶意创造力行为量表(MCBS),该量表包含13个项目,旨在通过日常生活行为来测量个体的恶意创造力。共有958名来自中国不同地区的参与者以在线方式完成了MCBS。使用908份数据完全完整的MCBS计算得出的克朗巴哈α系数表明,MCBS具有令人满意的信度。探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)表明,MCBS有三个维度:伤人、说谎和耍手段。MCBS得分与个体的攻击性、开放性、外向性以及Runco创意行为量表(RIBS)得分呈正相关。MCBS得分还能预测个体在解决现实的、开放式问题时的恶意创造力表现。MCBS具有简单的作答方式和计分程序。结合本研究发现的良好心理测量学特性,这表明它是研究恶意创造力的一个有用工具。鉴于MCBS包含的类别和项目数量相对较少,未来的研究可以扩大项目类别,并开发和测试更多项目。此外,用其他标准来检验MCBS的信度和效度会很有帮助。也许未来的研究可以从罪犯或其他明确的恶意样本中获取实际的MC数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a750/4870273/4087fea97e19/fpsyg-07-00682-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A New Tool to Measure Malevolent Creativity: The Malevolent Creativity Behavior Scale.
Front Psychol. 2016 May 18;7:682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00682. eCollection 2016.
2
Psychometric examination of Runco Ideational Behavior Scale: Thai adaptation.
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2021 Jan 11;34(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41155-020-00170-9.
3
7
The Effect of Parenting Practices on Creativity: Mediating Role of Psychological Resilience.
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Nov 2;16:4501-4514. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S436370. eCollection 2023.
9
The impact of parenting style on malevolent creativity based on Chinese university students: a latent profile analysis.
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 26;15:1363778. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1363778. eCollection 2024.
10
The Relationship Between Childhood Neglect and Malevolent Creativity: The Mediating Effect of the Dark Triad Personality.
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 16;11:613695. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613695. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Field dependent-independent cognitive style as a predictor of malevolent creativity: a multifaceted approach.
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 2;16:1502823. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1502823. eCollection 2025.
2
The Social Context of Malevolent Creativity.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 5;15(5):630. doi: 10.3390/bs15050630.
3
5
The impact of parenting style on malevolent creativity based on Chinese university students: a latent profile analysis.
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 26;15:1363778. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1363778. eCollection 2024.
7
The Influence of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Malevolent Creativity in Young Adulthood.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Nov 22;13(12):961. doi: 10.3390/bs13120961.
8
The Effect of Parenting Practices on Creativity: Mediating Role of Psychological Resilience.
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Nov 2;16:4501-4514. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S436370. eCollection 2023.
10
Childhood Maltreatment and Creativity among Chinese College Students: A Serial Mediation Model.
J Intell. 2023 Mar 24;11(4):58. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11040058.

本文引用的文献

1
The bias against creativity: why people desire but reject creative ideas.
Psychol Sci. 2012 Jan 1;23(1):13-7. doi: 10.1177/0956797611421018. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
2
Human aggression.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:27-51. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231.
3
Everyday lies in close and casual relationships.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jan;74(1):63-79. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.1.63.
4
The aggression questionnaire.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 Sep;63(3):452-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.63.3.452.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验