临床实践指南制定中财务利益的不披露：一个棘手的问题？
Nondisclosure of Financial Interest in Clinical Practice Guideline Development: An Intractable Problem?
作者信息
Bastian Hilda
机构信息
National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
出版信息
PLoS Med. 2016 May 31;13(5):e1002030. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002030. eCollection 2016 May.
Abstract
In a Perspective linked to Stelfox and colleagues, Hilda Bastian discusses the challenges of improving transparency and management of financial conflicts of interest among committees that develop guidelines for medical practice.
摘要
在一篇与斯特尔福克斯及其同事相关的观点文章中，希尔达·巴斯蒂安探讨了在为医疗实践制定指南的委员会中，提高财务利益冲突透明度和管理的挑战。
相似文献
1
Nondisclosure of Financial Interest in Clinical Practice Guideline Development: An Intractable Problem?临床实践指南制定中财务利益的不披露：一个棘手的问题？
PLoS Med. 2016 May 31;13(5):e1002030. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002030. eCollection 2016 May.
2
Conflict of interest reporting in otolaryngology clinical practice guidelines.耳鼻喉科临床实践指南中的利益冲突报告。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Aug;149(2):187-91. doi: 10.1177/0194599813490894. Epub 2013 May 23.
3
Guideline funding and conflicts of interest: article 4 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.指南资助与利益冲突：COPD 指南制定中的整合与协调工作（Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development）的第 4 条。美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会（ATS/ERS）官方工作组报告。
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):234-42. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-057ST.
4
Reporting of financial conflicts of interest in clinical practice guidelines: a case study analysis of guidelines from the Canadian Medical Association Infobase.临床实践指南中财务利益冲突的报告：对加拿大医学协会信息库指南的案例研究分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 15;16(a):383. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1646-5.
5
Commentary: Disclosure's failings: what is the alternative?评论：信息披露的不足：还有什么其他选择？
Acad Med. 2009 Sep;84(9):1180-1. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b17e93.
6
The vexing problem of guidelines and conflict of interest: a potential solution.指南与利益冲突的棘手问题：一种潜在的解决方案。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jun 1;152(11):738-41. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00254. Epub 2010 May 17.
7
Prevalence of financial conflicts of interest among panel members producing clinical practice guidelines in Canada and United States: cross sectional study.加拿大和美国制作临床实践指南的专家组委员中存在财务利益冲突的比例：横断面研究。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 11;343:d5621. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5621.
8
Evaluation of Financial Conflicts of Interests Among Congress of Neurological Surgeon Guideline Authors.评估神经外科医师学会指南作者的财务利益冲突。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Dec 1;155(12):1168-1169. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3515.
9
Conflict of Interest Policies and Industry Relationships of Guideline Development Group Members: A Cross-Sectional Study of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Depression.指南制定小组成员的利益冲突政策与行业关系：抑郁症临床实践指南的横断面研究
Account Res. 2017;24(2):99-115. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2016.1251319. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
10
Financial conflicts of interest in plastic surgery: background, potential for bias, disclosure, and transparency.整形手术中的经济利益冲突：背景、偏见可能性、披露与透明度
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Apr;135(4):1149-1155. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000788.
引用本文的文献
1
Reporting quality of practice guidelines on colorectal cancer: evaluation using the RIGHT reporting checklist.结直肠癌实践指南的报告质量：使用RIGHT报告清单进行评估
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jul;9(14):1175. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-2798.
2
Conflicts of interest in clinical guidelines, advisory committee reports, opinion pieces, and narrative reviews: associations with recommendations.临床指南、顾问委员会报告、观点文章和叙述性评论中的利益冲突：与建议的关联。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 8;12(12):MR000040. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000040.pub3.
3
Reporting of conflicts of interest and of sponsorship of guidelines in anaesthesiology. A cross-sectional study.报告麻醉学中的利益冲突和指南赞助。一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 27;14(2):e0212327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212327. eCollection 2019.
4
Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Failed Antidepressant Treatment Response in Major Depressive Disorder, Dysthymia, and Subthreshold Depression in Adults.成人重度抑郁症、心境恶劣障碍及阈下抑郁抗抑郁治疗反应失败的临床实践指南系统评价
Can J Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;62(1):11-23. doi: 10.1177/0706743716664885. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
本文引用的文献
1
Financial Relationships between Organizations That Produce Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Biomedical Industry: A Cross-Sectional Study.制定临床实践指南的组织与生物医学行业之间的财务关系：一项横断面研究。
PLoS Med. 2016 May 31;13(5):e1002029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002029. eCollection 2016 May.
2
Guidelines International Network: Principles for Disclosure of Interests and Management of Conflicts in Guidelines.指南国际网络：指南中披露利益冲突和管理冲突的原则。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Oct 6;163(7):548-53. doi: 10.7326/M14-1885.
3
Managing conflicts of interest in the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines programme: qualitative study.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所（NICE）临床指南项目中利益冲突的管理：定性研究
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 26;10(3):e0122313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122313. eCollection 2015.
4
Contributors to primary care guidelines: What are their professions and how many of them have conflicts of interest?基层医疗指南的制定者：他们从事什么职业，其中有多少人存在利益冲突？
Can Fam Physician. 2015 Jan;61(1):52-8.
5
Expanding disease definitions in guidelines and expert panel ties to industry: a cross-sectional study of common conditions in the United States.指南中疾病定义的扩展和与行业的专家小组联系：美国常见疾病的横断面研究。
PLoS Med. 2013 Aug;10(8):e1001500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001500. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
6
Underreporting of conflicts of interest in clinical practice guidelines: cross sectional study.临床实践指南中利益冲突报告不足：横断面研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 May 3;14:19. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-19.
7
Conflict of interest disclosures for clinical practice guidelines in the national guideline clearinghouse.国家指南资料库中临床实践指南的利益冲突披露。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e47343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047343. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
8
"They would say that, wouldn't they?" A reader's guide to author and sponsor biases in clinical research.“他们当然会这么说，不是吗？”临床研究中作者和资助者偏倚的读者指南。
J R Soc Med. 2006 Dec;99(12):611-4. doi: 10.1177/014107680609901207.
9
Cash interests taint drug advice.金钱利益玷污药物建议。
Nature. 2005 Oct 20;437(7062):1070-1. doi: 10.1038/4371070a.
10
Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal.专业协会制定的实践指南：批判性评估的必要性。
Lancet. 2000 Jan 8;355(9198):103-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)02171-6.
Zotero 插件