Mavritsaki Eirini, Humphreys Glyn
Birmingham City University.
Oxford University.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Oct;28(10):1553-67. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00984. Epub 2016 May 31.
Human visual search operates not only over space but also over time, as old items remain in the visual field and new items appear. Preview search (where one set of distractors appears before the onset of a second set) has been used as a paradigm to study search over time and space [Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90-122, 1997], with participants showing efficient search when old distractors can be ignored and new targets prioritized. The benefits of preview search are lost, however, if a temporal gap is introduced between a first presentation of the old items and the re-presentation of all the items in the search display [Kunar, M. A., Humphreys, G. W., & Smith, K. J. History matters: The preview benefit in search is not onset capture. Psychological Science, 14, 181-185, 2003a], consistent with the old items being bound by temporal onset to the new stimuli. This effect of temporal binding can be eliminated if the old items reappear briefly before the new items, indicating also a role for the memory of the old items. Here we simulate these effects of temporal coding in search using the spiking search over time and space model [Mavritsaki, E., Heinke, D., Allen, H., Deco, G., & Humphreys, G. W. Bridging the gap between physiology and behavior: Evidence from the sSoTS model of human visual attention. Psychological Review, 118, 3-41, 2011]. We show that a form of temporal binding by new onsets has to be introduced to the model to simulate the effects of a temporal gap, but that effects of the memory of the old item can stem from continued neural suppression across a temporal gap. We also show that the model can capture the effects of brain lesion on preview search under the different temporal conditions. The study provides a proof-of-principle analysis that neural suppression and temporal binding can be sufficient to account for human search over time and space.
人类视觉搜索不仅在空间上进行,也在时间上进行,因为旧的项目会保留在视野中,新的项目会出现。预览搜索(一组干扰项在另一组出现之前呈现)已被用作研究时间和空间上搜索的范式[沃森,D.G.,& 汉弗莱斯,G.W.视觉标记:通过对旧物体的自上而下注意抑制来优先选择新物体。《心理学评论》,104,90 - 122,1997],当旧干扰项可以被忽略且新目标被优先处理时,参与者表现出高效的搜索。然而,如果在旧项目的首次呈现与搜索显示中所有项目的重新呈现之间引入时间间隔,预览搜索的优势就会丧失[库纳尔,M.A.,汉弗莱斯,G.W.,& 史密斯,K.J.历史很重要:搜索中的预览优势不是起始捕获。《心理科学》,14,181 - 185,2003a],这与旧项目在时间上与新刺激绑定一致。如果旧项目在新项目之前短暂重新出现,时间绑定的这种效应可以消除,这也表明了旧项目记忆的作用。在这里,我们使用随时间和空间的脉冲搜索模型[马夫里茨基,E.,海因克,D.,艾伦,H.,德科,G.,& 汉弗莱斯,G.W.弥合生理学与行为之间的差距:来自人类视觉注意的sSoTS模型的证据。《心理学评论》,118,3 - 41,2011]来模拟搜索中时间编码的这些效应。我们表明,必须在模型中引入一种由新起始点引起的时间绑定形式来模拟时间间隔的效应,但旧项目记忆的效应可能源于跨时间间隔的持续神经抑制。我们还表明,该模型可以捕捉不同时间条件下脑损伤对预览搜索的影响。该研究提供了一项原理验证分析,即神经抑制和时间绑定足以解释人类在时间和空间上的搜索。