Suppr超能文献

伊利扎洛夫骨搬运术与腓骨移植术治疗儿童胫骨骨缺损的比较

Ilizarov bone transport versus fibular graft for reconstruction of tibial bone defects in children.

作者信息

Abdelkhalek Mostafa, El-Alfy Barakat, Ali Ayman M

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

出版信息

J Pediatr Orthop B. 2016 Nov;25(6):556-60. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000334.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the results of treatment of segmental tibial defects in the pediatric age group using an Ilizarov external fixator versus a nonvascularized fibular bone graft. This study included 24 patients (age range from 5.5 to 15 years) with tibial bone defects: 13 patients were treated with bone transport (BT) and 11 patients were treated with a nonvascularized fibular graft (FG). The outcome parameters were bone results (union, deformity, infection, leg-length discrepancy) and functional results: external fixation index and external fixation time. In group A (BT), one patient developed refracture at the regenerate site, whereas, in group B (FG), after removal of the external fixator, one of the FGs developed a stress fracture. The external fixator time in group A was 10.7 months (range 8-14.5) versus 7.8 months (range 4-11.5 months) in group B (FG). In group A (BT), one patient had a limb-length discrepancy (LLD), whereas, in group B (FG), three patients had LLD. The functional and bone results of the Ilizarov BT technique were excellent in 23.1 and 30.8%, good in 38.5 and 46.2, fair in 30.8 and 15.4, and poor in 7.6 and 7.6%, respectively. The poor functional result was related to the poor bone result because of prolonged external fixator time resulting in significant pain, limited ankle motion, whereas the functional and bone results of fibular grafting were excellent in 9.1 and 18.2%, good in 63.6 and 45.5%, fair in 18.2 and 27.2%, and poor in 9.1 and 9.1%, respectively. Segmental tibial defects can be effectively treated with both methods. The FG method provides satisfactory results, with early removal of the external fixator. However, it had a limitation in patients with severe infection and those with LLD. Also, it requires a long duration of limb bracing until adequate hypertrophy of the graft. The Ilizarov method has the advantages of early weight bearing, treatment of postinfection bone defect in a one-stage surgery, and the possibility to treat the associated LLD. However, it has a long external fixation time.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较使用伊里扎洛夫外固定器与非血管化腓骨移植治疗儿童期节段性胫骨缺损的结果。本研究纳入了24例(年龄范围为5.5至15岁)胫骨骨缺损患者:13例患者接受骨搬运(BT)治疗,11例患者接受非血管化腓骨移植(FG)治疗。结果参数包括骨结果(愈合、畸形、感染、肢体长度差异)和功能结果:外固定指数和外固定时间。在A组(BT)中,1例患者在再生部位发生再骨折,而在B组(FG)中,拆除外固定器后,1根腓骨移植骨发生应力性骨折。A组的外固定时间为10.7个月(范围8 - 14.5个月),而B组(FG)为7.8个月(范围4 - 11.5个月)。在A组(BT)中,1例患者存在肢体长度差异(LLD),而在B组(FG)中,3例患者存在LLD。伊里扎洛夫BT技术的功能和骨结果分别有23.1%和30.8%为优,38.5%和46.2%为良,30.8%和15.4%为中,7.6%和7.6%为差。功能结果差与骨结果差有关,因为外固定时间延长导致明显疼痛、踝关节活动受限,而腓骨移植的功能和骨结果分别有9.1%和18.2%为优,63.6%和45.5%为良,18.2%和27.2%为中,9.1%和9.1%为差。两种方法均可有效治疗节段性胫骨缺损。FG方法能提供满意的结果,可早期拆除外固定器。然而,它在严重感染患者和存在LLD的患者中有局限性。此外,在移植骨充分肥大之前需要长时间的肢体支撑。伊里扎洛夫方法具有早期负重、一期手术治疗感染后骨缺损以及治疗相关LLD的可能性等优点。然而,它的外固定时间较长。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验