Suppr超能文献

骨搬运治疗创伤性胫骨骨与软组织复合缺损:除了伊利扎洛夫技术之外还有什么特殊需求?

Bone Transport for Treatment of Traumatic Composite Tibial Bone and Soft Tissue Defects: Any Specific Needs besides the Ilizarov Technique?

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510610, China.

Orthopaedic Hospital of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510610, China.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2020 Feb 24;2020:2716547. doi: 10.1155/2020/2716547. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the surgical efficacy of bone transport (Ilizarov technique) plus "shortening-lengthening," "flap surgery," and "open bone transport" as individualized treatments for traumatic composite tibial bone and soft tissue defects.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed sixty-eight cases (mean age: 35.69 years, (range, 16-65)) treated from July 2014 to June 2017, including 29 middle, 18 distal, and 21 proximal tibial bone defects (4-18 cm, mean: 7.97 cm) with soft tissue defects (2.5 cm × 4.0 cm to 30.0 cm × 35.0 cm after debridement). We adopted the bone transport external fixator to fix the fracture after debriding the defect parts. In the meantime, we adopted the "shortening-lengthening technique," "flap surgery," and "open bone transport" as individualized treatment based on the location, range, and severity of the composite tibial bone and soft tissue defects. Postoperative follow-up was carried out. Surgical efficacy was assessed based on (1) wound healing; (2) bone defect healing rate; (3) external fixation time and index; (4) incidence/recurrence of deep infection; (5) postoperative complications; and (6) Association for the Study and Application of the Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) score.

RESULTS

The mean duration from injury to reconstruction was 22 days (4-80 d), and the mean postoperative follow-up period was 30.8 months (18-54 m). After the repair and reconstruction, 2 open bone transport patients required infected bone removal first before continuing the bone transport treatment. No deep infection (osteomyelitis) occurred or recurred in the remaining patients, and no secondary debridement was required. Some patients had complications after surgery. All the postoperative complications, including flap venous crisis, nail channel reaction, bone nonunion, mechanical axis deviation, and refracture, were improved or alleviated. External fixation time was 12.5 ± 3.41 months, and the index was 1.63 ± 0.44. According to the ASAMI score, 76.47% of the outcomes were good/excellent.

CONCLUSION

The Ilizarov technique yields satisfactory efficacy for composite tibial bone and soft tissue defects when combined with "shortening-lengthening technique," "flap surgery," and "open bone transport" with appropriate individualized treatment strategies.

摘要

目的

评估骨搬运(伊利扎洛夫技术)联合“缩短-延长”、“皮瓣手术”和“开放式骨搬运”作为治疗创伤性胫骨骨和软组织复合缺损的个体化治疗方法的手术疗效。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2014 年 7 月至 2017 年 6 月期间收治的 68 例患者(平均年龄 35.69 岁,(范围 16-65 岁)),包括 29 例胫骨中段、18 例胫骨下段和 21 例胫骨上段骨缺损(4-18 cm,平均 7.97 cm)合并软组织缺损(清创后 2.5 cm×4.0 cm 至 30.0 cm×35.0 cm)。我们采用骨搬运外固定器固定清创后的骨折部位。同时,根据复合胫骨骨和软组织缺损的位置、范围和严重程度,采用“缩短-延长技术”、“皮瓣手术”和“开放式骨搬运”作为个体化治疗方法。术后进行随访。根据(1)创面愈合情况;(2)骨缺损愈合率;(3)外固定时间和指数;(4)深部感染的发生率/复发率;(5)术后并发症;(6)伊利扎洛夫应用研究协会(ASAMI)评分评估手术疗效。

结果

从受伤到重建的平均时间为 22 天(4-80 天),术后平均随访时间为 30.8 个月(18-54 个月)。修复重建后,2 例开放式骨搬运患者需先去除感染性骨块,然后继续骨搬运治疗。其余患者均未发生深部感染(骨髓炎)或复发,无需再次清创。部分患者术后出现并发症。所有术后并发症,包括皮瓣静脉危象、钉道反应、骨不连、机械轴偏差和再骨折,均得到改善或缓解。外固定时间为 12.5±3.41 个月,指数为 1.63±0.44。根据 ASAMI 评分,76.47%的结果为良好/优秀。

结论

当联合“缩短-延长技术”、“皮瓣手术”和“开放式骨搬运”并采用适当的个体化治疗策略时,伊利扎洛夫技术治疗胫骨骨和软组织复合缺损的疗效满意。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4481/7060447/887f03e74750/BMRI2020-2716547.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验