Monticone Marco, Ambrosini Emilia, Rocca Barbara, Cazzaniga Daniele, Liquori Valentina, Pedrocchi Alessandra, Vernon Howard
1 Department of Public Health, Clinical and Molecular Medicine, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
2 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Scientific Institute of Lissone, Salvatore Maugeri Foundation IRCCS, Lissone, Italy.
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Jun;31(6):742-752. doi: 10.1177/0269215516651979. Epub 2016 May 31.
To evaluate the effect of a group-based multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme on disability, pain and quality of life in subjects with chronic neck pain.
Randomized controlled trial.
Specialized rehabilitation centre.
A total of 170 patients (mean age of 53 years (13); 121 females).
The multidisciplinary group underwent a multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme combining multimodal exercises with psychologist-lead cognitive-behavioural therapy sessions. The general exercise group underwent general physiotherapy. Both groups followed group-based programmes once a week for ten weeks. Additionally, the multidisciplinary group met with the psychologist once a week for a 60-minute session.
The Neck Disability Index (primary outcome), the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, a pain numerical rating scale and the Short-Form Health Survey. The participants were evaluated before, after training and after 12 months.
A linear mixed model for repeated measures was used for each outcome measure. Significant effects ( p-value <0.001) were found over time and between groups for all outcome measures. After training, significant improvements were found for both groups for all outcome measures except kinesiophobia and catastrophizing, which did not change in the control group; however, the improvements were significantly greater for the multidisciplinary group. At 12-month follow-up a clinically meaningful between-group difference of 12.4 Neck Disability Index points was found for disability.
A group-based multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme including cognitive-behavioural therapy was superior to group-based general physiotherapy in improving disability, pain and quality of life of subjects with chronic neck pain. The effects lasted for at least one year.
评估基于小组的多学科康复计划对慢性颈痛患者残疾程度、疼痛及生活质量的影响。
随机对照试验。
专业康复中心。
共170例患者(平均年龄53岁(13);女性121例)。
多学科小组接受了一项多学科康复计划,该计划将多模式锻炼与心理医生主导的认知行为治疗相结合。一般锻炼组接受常规物理治疗。两组均每周参加一次小组项目,为期十周。此外,多学科小组每周与心理医生会面一次,时长60分钟。
颈部残疾指数(主要结局指标)、坦帕运动恐惧量表、疼痛灾难化量表、疼痛数字评定量表及简短健康调查问卷。在训练前、训练后及12个月后对参与者进行评估。
对每个结局指标均使用重复测量的线性混合模型。所有结局指标在不同时间及组间均发现显著效应(p值<0.001)。训练后,两组在所有结局指标上均有显著改善,但运动恐惧和灾难化方面除外,对照组在这两项上未发生变化;然而,多学科小组的改善更为显著。在12个月随访时,发现两组在残疾方面存在具有临床意义的差异,颈部残疾指数相差12.4分。
包括认知行为治疗的基于小组的多学科康复计划在改善慢性颈痛患者的残疾程度、疼痛及生活质量方面优于基于小组的常规物理治疗。效果至少持续一年。