Research Unit for Musculoskeletal Function and Physiotherapy, Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Dec 2;12:274. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-274.
Many patients suffer from chronic neck pain following a whiplash injury. A combination of cognitive, behavioural therapy with physiotherapy interventions has been indicated to be effective in the management of patients with chronic whiplash-associated disorders. The objective is to present the design of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a combined individual physical and cognitive behavioural-graded activity program on self-reported general physical function, in addition to neck function, pain, disability and quality of life in patients with chronic neck pain following whiplash injury compared with a matched control group measured at baseline and 4 and 12 months after baseline.
METHODS/DESIGN: The design is a two-centre, RCT-study with a parallel group design. Included are whiplash patients with chronic neck pain for more than 6 months, recruited from physiotherapy clinics and an out-patient hospital department in Denmark. Patients will be randomised to either a pain management (control) group or a combined pain management and training (intervention)group. The control group will receive four educational sessions on pain management, whereas the intervention group will receive the same educational sessions on pain management plus 8 individual training sessions for 4 months, including guidance in specific neck exercises and an aerobic training programme. Patients and physiotherapists are aware of the allocation and the treatment, while outcome assessors and data analysts are blinded. The primary outcome measures will be Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF36), Physical Component Summary (PCS). Secondary outcomes will be Global Perceived Effect (-5 to +5), Neck Disability Index (0-50), Patient Specific Functioning Scale (0-10), numeric rating scale for pain bothersomeness (0-10), SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS), TAMPA scale of Kinesiophobia (17-68), Impact of Event Scale (0-45), EuroQol (0-1), craniocervical flexion test (22 mmHg - 30 mmHg), joint position error test and cervical range of movement. The SF36 scales are scored using norm-based methods with PCS and MCS having a mean score of 50 with a standard deviation of 10.
The perspectives of this study are discussed, in addition to the strengths and weaknesses.
The study is registered in http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01431261.
许多患者在挥鞭伤后会遭受慢性颈部疼痛。已经表明,将认知、行为疗法与物理治疗干预相结合,对慢性与挥鞭伤相关的疾病患者的管理是有效的。目的是介绍一项随机对照试验 (RCT) 的设计,旨在评估个体物理和认知行为分级活动方案的组合对慢性颈痛挥鞭伤患者的自我报告一般身体功能的影响,以及颈部功能、疼痛、残疾和生活质量,与基线和基线后 4 个月和 12 个月的匹配对照组相比。
方法/设计:该设计是一项具有平行组设计的两中心 RCT 研究。包括来自丹麦物理治疗诊所和门诊医院部门的慢性颈痛挥鞭伤患者超过 6 个月。患者将被随机分配到疼痛管理(对照组)或联合疼痛管理和训练(干预组)组。对照组将接受 4 次关于疼痛管理的教育课程,而干预组将接受相同的关于疼痛管理的教育课程以及 4 个月的 8 次个体训练课程,包括特定颈部运动的指导和有氧运动计划。患者和物理治疗师了解分配和治疗情况,而结果评估者和数据分析者则不知情。主要结局指标将是医疗结局研究短表单 36(SF36)、物理成分综合评分(PCS)。次要结局将是全球感知效果(-5 至+5)、颈部残疾指数(0-50)、患者特定功能量表(0-10)、疼痛困扰数字评分量表(0-10)、SF-36 心理成分综合评分(MCS)、坦帕运动恐惧量表(17-68)、事件影响量表(0-45)、欧洲五维健康量表(0-1)、颅颈屈曲试验(22mmHg-30mmHg)、关节位置误差试验和颈椎活动范围。SF36 量表采用基于规范的方法评分,PCS 和 MCS 的平均得分为 50,标准差为 10。
除了优势和劣势外,还讨论了这项研究的观点。
该研究在 http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,标识符为 NCT01431261。