Lin Hsiu-Fen, Chern Chang-Ming, Chen Hui-Mei, Yeh Yi-Chun, Yao Shu-Chih, Huang Mei-Feng, Wang Shuu-Jiun, Chen Cheng-Sheng, Fuh Jong-Ling
Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 1;11(6):e0156404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156404. eCollection 2016.
To validate the three time-difference neuropsychological protocols developed by the National Institute of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and the Canadian Stroke Network for assessment of vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) in Mandarin-speaking subjects and to investigate the clinical application of the shortest form.
Patients aged 50 years or older who had a stroke were invited to participate in the study. Clinical diagnosis of VCI was made. The NINDS-VCI Neuropsychology Protocols, 60-, 30-, and two 5-minute protocols, were administered. The criteria validities of the cognitive protocols against the diagnoses of stroke and VCI were determined via Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. The optimal cut-off point for the 5-minute protocols total score was estimated for clinical use in screening.
Eighty-three patients and 53 controls were recruited during the study period. Patients with stroke performed more poorly than the control group in the three neuropsychological protocols. Forty-two patients with stroke were diagnosed with VCI. VCI was used as the standard to estimate the criteria validities. The area under the ROC curve was 0.78, 0.80, 0.75, and 0.73 for the 60-, 30-, 5-mintue protocol-A and 5-minute protocol-B, respectively.
These modified neuropsychological protocols can be used as valid instruments when performing comprehensive cognitive assessment or for screening of VCI in Taiwan.
验证美国国立卫生研究院/国立神经疾病与中风研究所(NINDS)及加拿大中风网络所制定的三种时间差神经心理学方案,以评估说普通话的受试者的血管性认知障碍(VCI),并研究最短形式方案的临床应用。
邀请年龄在50岁及以上的中风患者参与研究。进行VCI的临床诊断。实施NINDS-VCI神经心理学方案,即60分钟、30分钟及两种5分钟的方案。通过受试者操作特征(ROC)分析确定认知方案相对于中风和VCI诊断的标准效度。估计5分钟方案总分的最佳截断点以供临床筛查使用。
研究期间招募了83例患者和53名对照。中风患者在三种神经心理学方案中的表现比对照组差。42例中风患者被诊断为VCI。以VCI作为标准来估计标准效度。60分钟、30分钟、5分钟方案A和5分钟方案B的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.78、0.80、0.75和0.73。
这些经过修改的神经心理学方案在台湾进行全面认知评估或筛查VCI时可作为有效的工具使用。