Suppr超能文献

探讨听觉认知敏感性在听力努力评估中的作用:一项同时进行的 EEG 和瞳孔测量研究。

Investigating Sensitivity to Auditory Cognition in Listening Effort Assessments: A Simultaneous EEG and Pupillometry Study.

机构信息

Department of Audiology, Faculty of Health Science, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey.

Department of Audiology, Faculty of Health Science, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Brain Behav. 2024 Nov;14(11):e70135. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70135.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is still not fully explained what kind of cognitive sources the methods used in the assessment of listening effort are more sensitive to and how these measurement results are related to each other. The aim of the study is to ascertain which neural resources crucial for listening effort are most sensitive to objective measurement methods using differently degraded speech stimuli.

METHODS

A total of 49 individuals between the ages of 19 and 34 with normal hearing participated in the study. In the first stage, simultaneous pupillometry, electroencephalogram (EEG), and single-task paradigm reaction time (RT) measurements were made during the challenging listening and repetition task with noise-vocoded speech. Two speech reception thresholds (SRT) (50% and 80%) for two vocoding conditions (16 and 6 channels) were collected, resulting in 4 conditions. In the second stage, the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) and the test of attention in listening (TAIL) were applied. Stepwise linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the predictors of listening effort measurements.

RESULTS

A significant difference was found between 6 and 16 channel stimuli in both pupil dilation change and EEG alpha band power change. In the hardest listening condition, whereas RAVLT scores are significant predictors of pupil dilation change, TAIL scores are significant predictors of EEG alpha power. As the stimulus difficulty decreased, the factors that predicted both EEG and pupillometry results decreased. In the single-task paradigm, a significant regression model could not be obtained at all four difficulty levels.

CONCLUSION

As a result of the study, it was found that the pupil dilation change was more sensitive to auditory memory skills and the EEG alpha power change was more sensitive to auditory attention skills. To our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the sensitivity of different listening effort measurement methods to auditory cognitive skills.

摘要

背景

目前仍不完全清楚评估听力努力程度所使用的方法更敏感于哪种认知来源,以及这些测量结果之间如何相互关联。本研究旨在确定对于听力努力程度至关重要的神经资源对使用不同程度语音失真刺激的客观测量方法最为敏感。

方法

共有 49 名年龄在 19 至 34 岁之间的听力正常的个体参加了这项研究。在第一阶段,在具有噪声编码语音的挑战性聆听和重复任务期间进行了同时瞳孔测量、脑电图(EEG)和单任务范式反应时间(RT)测量。收集了两种语音接收阈值(SRT)(50%和 80%)和两种语音编码条件(16 和 6 通道),共得到 4 种条件。在第二阶段,应用 Rey 听觉言语学习测试(RAVLT)和听力注意力测试(TAIL)。进行逐步线性回归分析,以检验听力努力测量的预测因子。

结果

在瞳孔扩张变化和 EEGα 波段功率变化方面,6 通道和 16 通道刺激之间存在显著差异。在最困难的聆听条件下,RAVLT 分数是瞳孔扩张变化的显著预测因子,而 TAIL 分数是 EEGα 功率的显著预测因子。随着刺激难度的降低,预测 EEG 和瞳孔测量结果的因素也随之减少。在单任务范式中,在所有四个难度水平都无法获得显著的回归模型。

结论

本研究发现,瞳孔扩张变化对听觉记忆技能更敏感,而 EEGα 功率变化对听觉注意力技能更敏感。据我们所知,这是首次研究不同听力努力程度测量方法对听觉认知技能的敏感性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2877/11527829/0bd6cd8f96cf/BRB3-14-e70135-g004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验