Richards C Sue, Palomaki Glenn E, Hegde Madhuri
Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Women & Infants Hospital and the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Genet Med. 2016 Dec;18(12):1290-1294. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.59. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
The aim of this study was to examine the performance of laboratories offering assessment for myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) using external proficiency testing samples. DM1, a dominant disorder, has a prevalence of 1:20,000 due to the expansion of CTG trinucleotide repeats in the DMPK gene.
External proficiency testing administered by the College of American Pathologists/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics distributes three samples twice yearly. Responses from 2003 through the first distribution of 2013 were analyzed after stratification by location (United States/international). Both the repeat sizes (analytic validity) and clinical interpretations were assessed.
Over the 21 distributions, 45 US and 29 international laboratories participated. Analytic sensitivity for detecting and reporting expanded repeats (≥50) was 99.2% (382/385 challenges) and 97.1% (133/137 challenges), respectively. Analytic specificity (to within two repeats of the consensus) was 99.2% (1,790/1,805 alleles) and 98.6% (702/712 alleles), respectively. Clinical interpretations were correct for 99.3% (450/453) and 98.2% (224/228) of positive challenges and in 99.9% (936/937) and 99.6% (455/457) of negative challenges, respectively. Of four incorrect interpretations made in the United States, two were probably due to sample mix-up.
This review of laboratory performance regarding laboratory-developed genetic tests indicates very high performance for both the analytic and interpretative challenges for DM1.Genet Med 18 12, 1290-1294.
本研究旨在使用外部能力验证样本,检验提供1型强直性肌营养不良(DM1)评估的实验室的表现。DM1是一种显性疾病,由于DMPK基因中CTG三核苷酸重复序列的扩增,其患病率为1:20000。
美国病理学家学会/美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会进行的外部能力验证每年分发两次三个样本。对2003年至2013年首次分发的回复按地点(美国/国际)分层后进行分析。评估了重复序列大小(分析有效性)和临床解读。
在21次分发中,45家美国实验室和29家国际实验室参与。检测和报告扩增重复序列(≥50)的分析敏感性分别为99.2%(382/385次挑战)和97.1%(133/137次挑战)。分析特异性(与共识序列相差两个重复序列以内)分别为99.2%(1790/1805个等位基因)和98.6%(702/712个等位基因)。阳性挑战的临床解读正确率分别为99.3%(450/453)和98.2%(224/228),阴性挑战的正确率分别为99.9%(936/937)和99.6%(455/457)。在美国做出的四次错误解读中,两次可能是由于样本混淆。
本次对实验室自行开发的基因检测的实验室表现回顾表明,DM1的分析和解读挑战的表现都非常高。《遗传医学》18卷12期,1290 - 1294页。